A comparison study of the pen and the mouse in editing graphic diagrams

Proceedings - 1993 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, VL 1993

Volumn , Issue , 1993, Pages 352-357

  Apte, A ^a   Kimura, T D ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPHIC METHODS; PETRI NETS;

COMPARISON STUDY; DATAFLOW; DIAGRAM EDITORS; PEN-BASED; SHAPE RECOGNITION; STATE DIAGRAM;

VISUAL LANGUAGES;

COMPUTER PROGRAMS; DIAGRAMS; EDITING; GRAPHIC METHODS; SHAPE; SYSTEMS;

EID: 85004063599     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/VL.1993.269609     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Cam, R. and Shafer, D. The Power of PenPoint. Addison-Wesley, 1991.
2. Draw User's Guide. AppSoft, Inc., 1992.
3. Dunne, S. "Towards Interactive Pen Input of Visual Languages," Proceedings of 1992 IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages, Seattle, September 1992, pp 243-245.
4. InkWare NoteTaker User Guide. InkDevelopment Corporation, 1992.
5. Kimura, T.D. "Silicon Paper and A Visual Inter face for Neural Networks," Proceedings of 1990 IEEE Workshop on visual Languages, Chicago, IL, October 1990, pp. 241-246.
6. Kimura, T.D. "Hyperflow: A Visual Programming Language for Pen Computers," Proceedings of I992 IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages, Seattle, September 1992, pp 125-132.
7. Kimura, T.D. "Potentials and Limitations of Pen Based Computers," Panel session chairman's position paper, Proceedings of 2Ist ACM Annual Com purer Science Conference(CSC'93), Indianapolis, February 1993, pp. 536-537.
8. Mahach, K.R. "A Comparison of Computer Input Devices: Linus Pen, Mouse, Cursor Keys and Key board," Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meetings of the Human Factor Society, 1989, pp. 330-333.
9. System 3125 User's manual. NCR Corporation, 1991.
10. Wolf, C. G. "A Comparative Study of Gestural, Keyboard, and Mouse Interfaces, " Behavior & Information Technology, vol. 11:1, 1992, pp. 13-23.