Comparison between retrograde and antegrade peripheral venous cannulation in intensive care unit patients: Assessment of thrombus formation

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 124, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1839-1845

  Mahmoud, Ahmed Abdelaal Ahmed ^a   El Shafei, Hassan Ismail ^b   Yassin, Hany Mahmoud ^c   Elramely, Mohamed Adly ^b   Abdelhaq, Mohamed Mohamed ^b   El Kady, Hany Wafiq ^b   Awada, Wael Nabil Fahemy ^a  

^a BENI SUEF UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^c Fayoum University   (Egypt)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENOXAPARIN;

ABSENCE OF COMPLICATIONS; ADULT; ANTEGRADE PERIPHERAL VENOUS CATHETER; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL WALL; CATHETER OCCLUSION; CATHETER THROMBOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG EMBOLISM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PERIPHERAL VEIN; PERIPHERAL VENOUS CATHETER; PORTABLE ULTRASOUND SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETROGRADE PERIPHERAL VENOUS CATHETER; SUPERFICIAL THROMBOPHLEBITIS; SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; THROMBOPHLEBITIS; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER; UPPER LIMB; VEIN BLOOD FLOW; VEIN CATHETERIZATION; VEIN THROMBOSIS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BLOOD; CATHETER OBSTRUCTION; CATHETERIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EGYPT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FOREARM; INDWELLING CATHETER; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; PROCEDURES; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; CATHETER OBSTRUCTION; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; EGYPT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOREARM; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; UPPER EXTREMITY DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICES;

EID: 85004000459     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: 15267598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001703     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 49: 1-45.
2. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52: e162-e193. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir257.
3. Leung A, Heal C, Banks J, Abraham B, Capati G, Pretorius C. The incidence of peripheral catheter-related thrombosis in surgical patients. Thrombosis. 2016; 2016: 6043427.
4. Katz SC, Pachter HL, Cushman JG, et al. Superficial septic thrombophlebitis. J Trauma. 2005; 59: 750-753.
5. Srikar Adhikari. The Point of care Ultrasound diagnosis of peripheral vein septic thrombophlebitis in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2013; 44: 183-184.
6. El-Shafei IL, El-Shafei HI. The retrograde ventriculovenous shunts: the El-Shafei retrograde ventriculojugular and ventriculosinus shunts. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2010; 46: 160-171.
7. McCabe WL, Smith JC. Fluid flow phenomenon, 2nd ed. In: Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1967: 47-67.
8. Rickard CM, Webster J, Wallis MC, et al. Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet. 2012; 380: 1066-1074.
9. Webster J, Osborne S, Rickard CM, New K. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 8: CD007798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub4.
10. Di Nisio M, Peinemann F, Porreca E, Rutjes AW. Treatment for superficial infusion thrombophlebitis of the upper extremity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 11: CD011015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011015.pub2.
11. José AL, Sofia J. The RIFLE and AKIN classifications for acute kidney injury: a critical and comprehensive review. Clin Kidney J. 2013; 6: 8-14.
12. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006; 81: 1159-1171.
13. Grüne F, Schrappe M, Basten J, et al. Phlebitis rate and time kinetics of short peripheral intravenous catheters. Infection. 2004; 32: 30-32.
14. Cornely OA, Bethe U, Pauls R, Waldschmidt D. Peripheral Teflon catheters: factors determining incidence of phlebitis and duration of cannulation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002; 23: 249-253.
15. Bregenzer T, Conen D, Sakmann P, Widmer AF. Is routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters necessary?. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158: 151-156.
16. Webster J, Lloyd S, Hopkins T, Osborne S, Yaxley M. Developing a research base for Intravenous Peripheral cannula re-sites (DRIP trial) A randomised controlled trial of hospital in-patients. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007; 44: 664-671.
17. Webster J, Clarke S, Paterson D, et al. Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008; 337: a339. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18614482. Accessed May 7, 2016.
18. Van Donk P, Rickard CM, McGrail MR, Doolan G. Routine replacement versus clinical monitoring of peripheral intravenous catheters in a regional hospital in the home program: a randomized controlled trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009; 30: 915-917.
19. Rickard CM, McCann D, Munnings J, McGrail MR. Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med. 2010; 8: 53.
20. Zhang L, Gowardman J, Rickard CM. Impact of microbial attachment on intravascular catheter-related infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011; 38: 9-15.
21. Schultz AA, Gallant P. Evidence-based quality improvement project for determining appropriate discontinuation of peripheral intravenous cannulas. Evid Based Nurs. 2005; 8: 8. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15688482. Accessed May 7, 2016.
22. Palese A, Cassone A, Kulla A, et al. Factors influencing nurses? decision-making process on leaving in the peripheral intravascular catheter after 96 hours: a longitudinal study. J Infus Nurs. 34: 319-326.
23. Bravery K, Dougherty L, Gabriel J, Kayley J, Malster M, Scales K. Audit of peripheral venous cannulae by members of an i.v. therapy forum. Br J Nurs. 2006; 15: 1244-1249.
24. Johansson ME, Pilhammar E, Willman A. Nurses? clinical reasoning concerning management of peripheral venous cannulae. J Clin Nurs. 2009; 18: 3366-3375.
25. Webster J, Osborne S, Rickard C, Hall J. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 3: CD007798. 10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub2.
26. Kooij JD, van der Zant FM, van Beek EJ, Reekers JA. Pulmonary embolism in deep venous thrombosis of the upper extremity: more often in catheter-related thrombosis. Neth J Med. 1997; 50: 238-242.
27. Van Canneyt K, Kips J, Mareels G, Baert E, Van Roost D, Verdonk P. Experimental & numerical modeling of the ventriculo-sinus shunt (EL Shafei shunt). J Bio Eng. 2008; 222: 455-464.
28. Hylton VJ, Samuel ZG. Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1874-1880.
29. Gaitini D, Beck-Razi N, Haim N, Brenner B. Prevalence of upper extremity deep venous thrombosis diagnosed by color Doppler duplex sonography in cancer patients with central venous catheters. J Ultrasound Med. 2006; 25: 1297-1303.
30. Litzendorf ME, Satiani B. Superficial venous thrombosis: disease progression and evolving treatment approaches. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011; 7: 569-575.
31. Jeanneret C, Brunner S. Superficial venous thrombosis A review. Hautarzt. 2012; 63: 609-615.
32. Wichers IM, Di Nisio M, Büller HR, Middeldorp S. Treatment of superficial vein thrombosis to prevent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Haematologica. 2005; 90: 672-677.
33. Bauersachs RM. Diagnosis and treatment of superficial vein thrombosis. Hamostaseologie. 2013; 33: 232-240.
34. Periard D, Monney P, Waeber G, et al. Randomized controlled trial of peripherally inserted central catheters vs. peripheral catheters for middle duration in-hospital intravenous therapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2008; 6: 1281-1288.
35. Lai KK. Safety of prolonging peripheral cannula and i.v. tubing use from 72 hours to 96 hours. Am J Infect Control. 1998; 26: 66-70.
36. Harigai M, Okada T, Umeoka S, et al. Non-contrast-enhanced MR venography of the upper limb: a comparative study of acquisitions with fresh blood imaging vs. time-of-flight methods. Clin Imaging. 2012; 36: 496-501.