Measuring the effect of greenbelt proximity on apartment rents in Seoul

Cities

Volumn 62, Issue , 2017, Pages 10-22

  Jun, Myung Jin ^a   Kim, Hee Jae ^b  

^a Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

^b Kangnam University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Apartment rent; Greenbelt; Seoul; Spatial hedonic price model

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATION; GREENBELT; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; RENTAL SECTOR; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

SEOUL [SEOUL (ADS)]; SEOUL [SOUTH KOREA]; SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 85003819811     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Amati, M., Yokohari, M., Temporal changes and local variations in the functions of London's green belt. Landscape and Urban Planning 75 (2006), 125–142.
2. Anselin, L., Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. 1988, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
3. Asabere, P.K., Huffman, F.E., The relative impacts of trails and greenbelts on home price. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 38 (2009), 408–419.
4. Bae, C.H.C., Korea's greenbelts: Impacts and options for change. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 7:3 (1998), 479–502.
5. Bae, C.H.C., Jun, M.J., Counterfactual planning: What if there had been no greenbelt in Seoul?. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22:4 (2003), 374–383.
6. Bengston, D.N., Youn, Y.C., Urban containment policies and the protection of natural areas: The case of Seoul's greenbelt. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 2006, 3.
7. Black, T.J., Hoben, J., Land price inflation and affordable housing. Urban Geography 6:1 (1985), 27–49.
8. Bolitzer, B., Netusil, N.R., The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon. Journal of Environmental Management 59 (2000), 185–193.
9. Brasington, D.M., Hite, D., Demand for environmental quality: A spatial hedonic analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics 35 (2005), 57–82.
10. Choi, M.J., An empirical analysis of the impacts of greenbelt on land prices in the Seoul metropolitan area. Korean Journal of Urban Planning 29:2 (1994), 97–111.
11. Correll, M.R., Lillydahl, J.H., Singell, L.D., The effects of greenbelts on residential property values: Some findings on the political economy of open space. Land Economics 54:2 (1978), 207–217.
12. Dawkins, C., Nelson, A., Urban containment policies and housing prices: An international comparison with implications for future research. Land Use Policy 19:1 (2002), 1–12.
13. Deaton, B.J., Vyn, R.J., The effect of Ontario's greenbelt on the price of vacant farmland. Canadian Journal of Agricultural 63:2 (2015), 185–208.
14. Elhorst, J.P., Applied spatial econometrics: Raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis 5:1 (2010), 9–28.
15. Elhorst, J.P., Spatial econometrics. Springer briefs in regional science 2014, 2014, 37–93.
16. Gibbons, S., Mourato, S., Resende, G., The amenity value of English nature: A hedonic price approach. Spatial economics research centre (SERC), 2011, London School of Economics and Political Sciences, London.
17. Glaeser, E., Gyourko, J., The impacts of building restrictions on housing affordability. Economic Policy Review 9:2 (2003), 21–39.
18. Griffith, D.A., Some guidelines for specifying the geographic weights matrix contained in spatial statistical models. Arlinghaus, S.L., (eds.) Practical handbook of spatial statistics, 1996, CRC Press, New York.
19. Hannah, L., Kim, K.H., Mills, E.S., Land use controls and housing prices in Korea. Urban Studies 30:1 (1993), 147–156.
20. Herath, S., Choumert, J., Maier, G., The value of the greenbelt in Vienna: A spatial hedonic analysis. The Annals of Regional Science 54:2 (2015), 349–374.
21. Hsieh, B.M., A study on spatial dependence of housing prices and housing submarkets in Tainan metropolis, Taiwan, Territorio Italia—land administration. 2(1), 2012, Cadastre, Real Estate, 9–22.
22. Hunt, L.M., Boxall, P., Englin, J., Haider, W., Remote tourism and forest management: A spatial hedonic analysis. Ecological Economics 53:1 (2005), 101–113.
23. Jun, M.J., The effects of Seoul's greenbelt on the spatial distribution of population and employment, and on the real estate market. Annals of Regional Science 49:3 (2012), 619–642.
24. Kadish, J., Netusil, N.R., Valuing vegetation in an urban watershed. Landscape and Urban Planning 104 (2012), 59–65.
25. Kelejian, H.H., Prucha, I.R., A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 17 (1998), 99–121.
26. Kim, K.H., Housing prices, affordability, and government policy in Korea. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 6 (1993), 55–71.
27. Kim, C.W., Phipps, T.T., Anselin, L., Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: A spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 (2003), 24–39.
28. Knaap, G., The price effects of urban growth boundaries in metropolitan Portland, Oregon. Land Economics 61 (1985), 26–35.
29. Kuhn, M., Greenbelt and green heart: Separating and integrating landscapes in European city regions. Landscape and Urban Planning 64 (2003), 19–27.
30. Lindsey, G., Man, G., Payton, S., Dickson, K., Property values, recreation values, and urban greenways. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 22:3 (2004), 69–90.
31. Malpezzi, S., Hedonic pricing models: A selective and applied review. Sullivan, T.O., Gibbs, K., (eds.) Housing economics: Essays in honour of Duncan Maclennan, 2003, Blackwell.
32. McConnell, V.D., Walls, M.A., The value of open space: Evidence from studies of nonmarket benefits. 2005, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
33. Melichar, J., Kaprova, K., Revealing preferences of Prague's homebuyers toward greenery amenities: The empirical evidence of distance-size effect. Urban ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 109:1 (2013), 56–66.
34. Morancho, A., A hedonic evaluation of urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 66 (2003), 35–41.
35. Mueller, J.M., Loomis, J.B., Spatial dependence in hedonic property models: Do different corrections for spatial dependence result in economically significant difference in estimated implicit price?. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 33:2 (2008), 212–231.
36. Nelson, A.C., A unifying overview of greenbelt influences on regional land values and implications for regional planning policy. Growth and Change 16:2 (1985), 43–48.
37. Nelson, A.C., Using land markets to evaluate urban containment programs. Journal of the American Planning Association 52:2 (1986), 156–171.
38. Nicholls, S., Crompton, J., The impact of greenways on property values: Evidence from Austin, Texas. Journal of Leisure Research 37 (2005), 321–341.
39. Payton, S., Lindsey, G., Wilson, J., Ottensman, J.R., Man, J., Valuing the benefits of the urban forest: A spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51:6 (2008), 717–736.
40. Pearce, D., Atkinson, G., Mourato, S., Cost-benefit analysis and the environment, recent developments. 2006, OECD.
41. Pendall, R., Martin, J., Holding the line: Urban containment in the United States. 2002, The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC.
42. Saphores, J.D., Li, W., Estimating the value of urban green areas: A hedonic pricing analysis of the single family housing market in Los Angeles, CA. Landscape and Urban Planning 104:3–4 (2012), 373–387.
43. Segal, D., Srinivasan, D., The impact of suburban growth restrictions on U.S. housing price inflation, 1975–78. Urban Geography 6:1 (1985), 14–26.
44. Tyrväinen, L., Miettinen, A., Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39:2 (2000), 205–223.
45. Visser, P., Van, D.F., Hooimeijer, P., Residential environment and spatial variation in house prices in the Netherlands. Royal Dutch Geographical Society 99:3 (2008), 348–360.
46. Watkins, C.A., The definition and identification of housing submarket. Environment & Planning A 33 (2001), 2235–2253.