Valorising the IoT Databox: creating value for everyone

Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Perera, Charith ^a   Wakenshaw, Susan Y L ^b   Baarslag, Tim ^c   Haddadi, Hamed ^d   Bandara, Arosha K ^a   Mortier, Richard ^e   Crabtree, Andy ^f   Ng, Irene C L ^b   McAuley, Derek ^f   Crowcroft, Jon ^e  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^d QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMMERCE; INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS;

DATA MARKETPLACES; DIGITAL ECONOMY; HETEROGENEOUS DATA; PHYSICAL SENSORS; POSITION PAPERS; RESEARCH CHALLENGES; SMART WEARABLES; SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS;

INTERNET OF THINGS;

EID: 85003550866     PISSN: 21615748     EISSN: 21613915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ett.3125     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Perera C, Liu CH, Jayawardena S, Chen M. A survey on internet of things from industrial market perspective. IEEE Access. 2014;2: 1660–1679.
2. Perera C, Ranjan R, Wang L, Khan SU, Zomaya AY. Big data privacy in the internet of things era. IT Professional. 2015;17(3): 32–39.
3. Mortier R, Lodge T, Bhandari N, et al. Demo: dataware, a personal data architecture. The Fourth Digital Economy All-Hands Meeting: Open Digital (DE), Salford, Manchester, UK; 2013.
4. HAT Project Research Team. HAT Briefing Paper 2: The Hub-of-all-Things (HAT) economic model of the multi-sided market platform and ecosystem. WMG Service Systems Research Group Working Paper Series (Number 02/15), 2015. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/65607/.
5. RCUK Digital Economy HAT Project. Engineering a market for personal data: the hub-of-all-things (HAT) a briefing paper. Technical Report, RCUK Digital Economy; 2014.
6. Chaudhry A, Crowcroft J, Howard H, et al. Personal data: thinking inside the box. 5th Decennial Aarhus Conferences (Aarhus 2015 Critical Alternatives), Aarhus, Denmark; 2015.
7. Chen H, Jin Q. Ubiquitous personal study: a framework for supporting information access and sharing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 2009;13(7): 539–548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0221-z [online].
8. Mun M, Hao S, Mishra N, et al. Personal data vaults: a locus of control for personal data streams. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, Co-NEXT '10, ACM, New York, NY, USA; 2010:17:1–17:12. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1921168.1921191 [online].
9. Perera C, Zaslavsky A, Christen P, Georgakopoulos D. Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by internet of things. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies. 2014;25(1): 81–93.
10. Google Inc. Introducing google opinion rewards. http://www.google.com/insights/consumersurveys/google_opinion_rewards [Accessed on: 28-02-2016]; 2016.
11. Datacoup. Unlock the value of your personal data, introducing the world's first personal data marketplace. https://datacoup.com/ [Accessed on:05-03-2016]; 2016.
12. Bates J. Thingalytics—Smart Big Data Analytics for the Internet of Things. Darmstadt, Germany: Software AG; 2015.
13. Kamleitner B, Dickert S, Falahrastegar M, Haddadi H. Information bazaar: a contextual evaluation. Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on Hotplanet, HotPlanet '13, ACM, New York, NY, USA; 2013:57–62. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2491159.2491161 [online].
14. Carrascal JP, Riederer C, Erramilli V, Cherubini M, deOliveira R. Your browsing behavior for a big mac: economics of personal information online. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '13, ACM, New York, NY, USA; 2013:189–200. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2488388.2488406 [online].
15. Bourgeois J, vander Linden J, Kortuem G, Price BA, Rimmer C. Conversations with my washing machine: an in-the-wild study of demand shifting with self-generated energy. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp '14. ACM, New York, NY, USA; 2014:459–470. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2632048.2632106 [online].
16. Najjar MS, Kettinger WJ. Data monetization: lessons from a retailer's journey. MIS Quarterly Executive. 2013;12(4): 213–225.
17. Prakash SD. Big data led big monetization. Vidwat. 2014;7(1): 6–7.
18. Bulger M, Taylor G, Schroeder R. Data-driven business models: challenges and opportunities of big data. Technical Report, Oxford Internet Institute; 2014.
19. Aperjis C, Huberman BA. A market for unbiased private data: paying individuals according to their privacy attitudes. Technical Report, Social Computing Group, HP Labs; 2012. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.0030v1.pdf [Accessed on: 06-10-2016].
20. Katz ML, Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review. 1985;75: 424–440.
21. Parker GG, VanAlstyne MW. Two-sided network effects: a theory of information product design. Management Science. October 2005;51(10): 1494–1504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400 [online].
22. Hagiu A. Multi-sided platforms: from microfoundations to design and expansion strategies. Working Paper, Harvard Business School Strategy Unit; 2007.
23. Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A. Platform rules: multi-sided platforms as regulators, Cheltenham,; 2009. http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:13257_7 [online].
24. Hagiu A, Wright J. Marketplace or reseller?Management Science. 2015;61(1): 184–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2042 [online].
25. Crabtree A, Mortier R. Human data interaction: historical lessons from social studies and CSCW. ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19-23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015:3–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4_1 [online].
26. Perera C, Liu CH, Jayawardena S. The emerging internet of things marketplace from an industrial perspective: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing. 2015;3(4): 585–598.
27. Westin A. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum; 1967.
28. Palen L, Dourish P. Unpacking “privacy” for a networked world. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '03, ACM, New York, NY, USA; 2003:129–136. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/642611.642635 [online].
29. Li H, Sarathy R, Xu H. Understanding situational online information disclosure as a privacy calculus. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2010;51(1): 62–71. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08874417.2010.11645450 [online].
30. Price BA, Mancini C, Rogers Y, et al. Contravision: presenting contrasting visions of future technology. CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '10, ACM, New York, NY, USA; 2010:4759–4764.
31. Baarslag T, Alan AT, Gomer RC, et al. Negotiation as an interaction mechanism for deciding app permissions. ACM SIGCHI Conference Extended Abstract on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA; 2016:2012–2019.
32. Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, Kantor PB. Recommender Systems Handbook. 1st. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.; 2010.
33. Solove DJ. A taxonomy of privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 2006January;154(3): 477–560.
34. Perera C, Ranjan R, Wang L. End-to-end privacy for open big data markets. IEEE Cloud Computing. 2015;2(4): 44–53.
35. Yang M, Yu Y, Bandara AK, Nuseibeh B. Adaptive sharing for online social networks: a trade-off between privacy risk and social benefit. 2014 IEEE 13th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, Beijing; 2014:45–52.
36. Mortier R, Haddadi H, Henderson T, McAuley D, Crowcroft J. Human-data interaction: the human face of the data-driven society. Social Science Research Network. 2014.
37. Koll D, Li J, Fu X. Soup: an online social network by the people, for the people. Proceedings of the 15th International Middleware Conference, Middleware '14, ACM, New York, NY, USA; 2014:193–204. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2663165.2663324 [online].
38. Karkkaainen T, Ott J. Liberouter: towards autonomous neighborhood networking. 2014 11th Annual Conference on Wireless On-Demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), Obergurgl; 2014:162–169.
39. Gawer A, Cusumano M. Introduction: platform leadership and complementary innovation. Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press; 2002.
40. Iansiti M, Levien R. The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2004.
41. Perera C, Zaslavsky A. Improve the sustainability of internet of things through trading-based value creation. 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), Seoul; 2014:135–140.
42. intelsecurity.com. Intel security's international internet of things smart home survey shows many respondents sharing personal data for money. https://newsroom.intel.com/news-releases/intel-securitys-international-internet-of-things-smart-home-survey/ [Accessed on: 11-05-2016]; 2016.
43. altimetergroup.com. Consumer perceptions of privacy in the internet of things: what brands can learn from a concerned citizenry. Technical Report, Altimeter Group; 2015.