Pikapika — the collaborative composition of an interactive sonic character

Organised Sound

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 229-238

  Hahn, Tomie ^a   Bahn, Curtis ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85003453238     PISSN: 13557718     EISSN: 14698153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1355771802003023     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bahn, C. 1998. Composition, Improvisation and Meta-Composition. Ph.D. dissertation in music composition, Princeton University.
2. Bahn, C., Hahn, T., and Trueman, D. 2001. Physicality and feedback: a focus on the body in the performance of electronic music. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
3. Bahn, C., and Trueman, D. 2001. Interface: electronic chamber ensemble. New Interfaces for Musical Expression, CHI 2001 Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 44–51.
4. Bowden, R., and Broadhurst, S. 2001. Interaction, Reaction and Performance. http://www.brunel.ac.uk/~emstvvr/ projects/jeremiahanim.html
5. Broadhurst, S. 2001. Intereaction, reaction and performance: the human body tracking project. Body/Space/Technology Online Journal 1(2). http://www.brunel.ac.uk/depts/pfa/ bstjoumal/lno12/joumallno2.htm
6. Cadoz, C., and Wanderley, M. 2000. Music - gesture. In CD-ROM, Trends in Gestural Control of Music. Paris, France: IRCAM.
7. Coniglio, M. 2002. Media technology. http://www. troikaranch.org/technology.html
8. Csikszentmihaly, M. 1991. Flow, The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY: HarperPerennial.
9. Dourish, P. 2001. Where The Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Fine, E., and Speer, J. H. 1992. Performance, Culture, and Identity. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
11. Griffith, N., and Fernstrom, M. 1998. Litefoot - a floorspace for recording dance and controlling media. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf., pp. 123–6. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
12. Hahn, T. (forthcoming). Sensational Knowledge: Teaching Japanese Dance. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
13. Hahn, T. 1996. Teaching through touch: an aspect of the kinesthetic transmission process of Nihon Buyo. In The Body in Dance: Modes of Inquiry, Paradigms for Viewing Artistic Work and Scientific Inquiry. Proc. of the Congr. on Research in Dance Conf.
14. Hahn, T. 1997. Sensational Knowledge: Transmitting Japanese Dance and Music. Ph.D. dissertation in ethnomusicology, Wesleyan University.
15. Heath, C., and Luff, P. 2000. Technology in Action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
16. Holtzman, S. 1996. Digital Mantras. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Leppert, R. (1993) 1995. The Sight of Sound: Music, Representation, and the History of the Body. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
18. McCorduck, P. 1991. Aaron’s Code, Meta-art, Artificial Intelligence, and the Work of Harold Cohen. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
19. Morales-Manzanares, R., Morales, E., Dannenberg, R., and Berger, J. 2001. SICIB: an interactive music composition system using body movements. Computer Music Journal 25(2): 25–36.
20. NOTAM. 2002. Control suit. http://www.notam02.no/ notam02/prod-maskin-kontrolldress.html
21. Paradiso, J., Abler, C., Hsiao, K. Y., and Reynolds, M. 1997. The Magic Carpet: physical sensing for immersive environments. Proc. of the CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 277–8. New York, NY: ACM Press.
22. Paradiso, J., Hsiao, K., and Hu, E. 1999. Interactive music for instrumented dancing shoes. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf., pp. 453–6. San Francisco: International Computer Music Association.
23. Paradiso, J., Hu, E., and Hsiao, K. 1999. The CyberShoe: a wireless multisensor interface for a dancer’s feet. In Proc. of the Int. Dance and Technology Conf. Tempe, AZ. Pinkston, R., Kerkhoff, J., and McQuilken, M. 1995. A touch sensitive dance floor/MIDI controller. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf, pp. 224–5. San Francisco: International Computer Music Association.
24. Rokeby, D. 2002. VNSII and VNSIII motion tracking systems. http://www.interlog.com/~drokeby/vnsII.html
25. Rowe, R. 1993. Interactive Music Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Rowe, R. 2001. Machine Musicianship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Seigel, W., and Jacobson, J. 1998. The challenges of interactive dance: an overview and case study. Computer Music Journal 22(4): 29-43.
28. STEIM. 2002. BigEye. http://www.steim.nl/bigeye.html
29. Trueman, D. 1999. Reinventing the Violin. Ph.D. dissertation in music composition, Princeton University.
30. Trueman, D., Bahn, C., and Cook, P. R. 2000. Alternative voices for electronic sound: spherical speakers and sensor-speaker arrays (SenSAs). In Proc. of the 2000 Int. Com- puter Music Conf. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
31. Trueman, D., and Cook, P. R. 1999. BoSSA: the deconstructed violin reconstructed. In Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
32. Trueman, D., and Luke Dubois, R. 2002. PeRColate. http://music.Columbia.edu/PeRColate
33. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Wanderley, M., Schnell, N., and Rovan, J.B. 1998. Escher - modeling and performing composed instruments in real-time. In IEEE Symp. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.
35. Winkler, T. 1995. Making motion musical: gesture mapping strategies for interactive computer music. Proc. of the 1995 Int. Computer Music Conf., pp. 261–4. San Francisco: International Computer Music Association.