Peripheral IV site rotation based on clinical assessment vs. length of time since insertion

MEDSURG Nursing

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 44-49

  Helton, Julie ^a   Hines, Annette ^b   Best, Janie ^b  

^a Pediatrix Medical Group   (United States)

^b QUEENS UNIVERSITY OF CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; CATHETERIZATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING; NURSING CARE; PHLEBITIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARDS; TIME FACTOR; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING CARE; PHLEBITIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85003054117     PISSN: 10920811     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Ascoli, G., DeGuzman, P., & Rowlands, A. (2013). A correlational study to compare hospitalized adults' peripheral intravenous catheter complication rates between those indwelling > 96 hours to those indwelling 72-96 hours. Internat-ional Journal of Nursing, 1(2), 7-12.
2. Duffy, J. (2009). Quality caring in nursing. Applying theory to clinical practice, education, and leadership. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
3. Gillies, D., & O-Riordan, E. (2012). Should intravenous catheters be replaced routinely? Lancet, 380(9847), 1036-1038.
4. Ho, H. M., & Cheung, S. K. (2012). Guidelines on timing in replacing peripheral intravenous catheters. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(11-12), 1499-1506. doi:10.1111/j. 1365-2702. 2011. 03974. x
5. Infusion Nurses Society (INS). (2011). Infusion nursing standards of practice. Journal of Infusion Nursing, 34(Suppl.), Sl1-sl110.
6. Lyons, M. G., & Kasker, J. (2012). Outcomes of a continuing education course on intravenous catheter insertion for experienced registered nurses. The Journal of Contin-uing Education in Nursing, 43(4), 177-181. doi:10. 3928/00220124-20111101-0
7. O'Grady, N., Alexander, M., Burns, L., Dellin ger, P., Garland, J., Heard, S.,. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). (2011). Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Retrieved from http://www. cdc. gov/hicpac/pdf/guide lines/bsi-guidelines-2011. pdf
8. Rickard, C., McCann, D., Munnings, J., & McGrail, M. (2010). The routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complication compared with clinically indicated resite: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Medi-cine, 8, 53-64. doi: 10. 1186/1741-7015-8-53
9. Smith, S., Duell, D., & Martin, B. (2012). Clinical nursing skills basic to advanced skills. Boston, MA: Pearson.
10. Tuffaha, H. W., Rickard, C. M., Webster, J., Marsh, N., Gordon, L., Wallis, M., & Scuffham, P. A. (2014). Cost-effectiveness analysis of clinically indicated versus routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters. Applied Health Economics & Health Policy, 12(1), 51-58. doi:10. 1007/s40258-013-0077-2
11. Webster, J., Clarke, S., Paterson, D., Hutton, A., van Dyk, S., Gale, C., & Hopkins, T. (2008). Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: Randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 337, 157-160. doi:10. 1136/bmj. a339
12. Webster, J., Osborne, S., Rickard, C., & Hall, J. (2010). Clinically-indicated replace ment versus routine replacement of peri pheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3), CD007798. doi:10. 1002/14651858. CD007798. pub2