Developing Artificial Neural Network Models to Predict Functioning One Year After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 97, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 1663-1668.e3

  Belliveau, Timothy ^a   Jette, Alan M ^b   Seetharama, Subramani ^c   Axt, Jeffrey ^a   Rosenblum, David ^d   Larose, Daniel ^e   Houlihan, Bethlyn ^b   Slavin, Mary ^b   Larose, Chantal ^f  

^a Hospital for Special Care New Britain   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c HARTFORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d Gaylord Hospital Wallingford   (United States)

^e CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Decision support techniques; Medical informatics; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMERICAN SPINAL INJURY ASSOCIATION IMPAIRMENT SCALE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BLADDER AND BOWEL MANAGEMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; EATING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MOBILIZATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEUROREHABILITATION; PATIENT TRANSPORT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; SPINAL CORD INJURY; TOILETING; TRAUMATIC SPINAL CORD INJURY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL; WALKING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELF CARE; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; WALKING;

EID: 85002836371     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Kirshblum, S.C., Priebe, M.M., Ho, C.H., Scelza, W.M., Chiodo, A.E., Wuermser, L.A., Spinal cord injury medicine. 3. Rehabilitation phase after acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88:3 Suppl 1 (2007), S62–S70.
2. Ditunno, J.F., Predicting recovery after spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation imperative. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 (1999), 361–364.
3. Anderson, K., Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord injured population. J Neurotrauma 10 (2004), 1371–1383.
4. Crozier, K.S., Graziani, V., Ditunno, J.F. Jr., Herbison, G.J., Spinal cord injury: prognosis for ambulation based on sensory examination in patients who are initially motor complete. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72 (1991), 119–121.
5. Crozier, K.S., Cheng, L.L., Graziani, V., Zorn, G., Herbison, G., Ditunno, J.F., Spinal cord injury: prognosis for ambulation based on quadriceps recovery. Spinal Cord 30 (1992), 762–767.
6. Waters, R.L., Yakura, J.S., Adkins, R.H., Sie, I., Recovery following complete paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73 (1992), 784–789.
7. Waters, R.L., Adkins, R.H., Yakura, J.S., Sie, I., Motor and sensory recovery following complete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 (1993), 242–247.
8. Waters, R.L., Adkins, R., Joy Yakura, R.P., Vigil, D., Prediction of ambulatory performance based on motor scores derived from standards of the American Spinal Injury Association. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75 (1994), 756–760.
9. Burns, S.P., Golding, D.G., Rolle, W.A., Graziani, V., Ditunno, J.F., Recovery of ambulation in motor-incomplete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78 (1997), 1169–1172.
10. Marino, R.J., Ditunno, J.F., Donovan, W.H., Maynard, F., Neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: data from the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 (1999), 1391–1396.
11. Scivoletto, G., Tamburella, F., Laurenza, L., Torre, M., Molinari, M., Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury. Front Hum Neurosci 8 (2014), 1–11.
12. Kirshblum, S.C., Burns, S.P., Biering-Sorensen, F., et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med 34 (2011), 535–546.
13. Daverat, P., Sibrac, M.C., Dartigues, J.F., et al. Early prognostic factors for walking in spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord 26 (1988), 255–261.
14. Brown, P.J., Marino, R.J., Herbison, G.J., Ditunno, J.F. Jr., The 72-hour examination as a predictor of recovery in motor complete quadriplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72 (1991), 546–548.
15. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury: clinical practice guidelines for health-care professionals. 1999, Paralyzed Veterans of America, Washington (DC).
16. Kirshblum, S.C., O'Connor, K.C., Levels of spinal cord injury and predictors of neurologic recovery. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 11 (2000), 1–27.
17. Osheroff, J.A., Teich, J.M., Middleton, B., Steen, E.B., Wright, A., Detmer, D.E., A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14 (2007), 141–145.
18. Schopp, L.H., Hales, J.W., Brown, G.D., Quetsch, J.L., A rationale and training agenda for rehabilitation informatics: roadmap for an emerging discipline. NeuroRehabilitation 18 (2003), 159–170.
19. Zorner, B., Blackenhom, W., Dietz, V. EM-SCI Study Group, Curt, A., Clinical algorithm for improved prediction of ambulation and patient stratification after incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 27 (2010), 241–252.
20. van Middendorp, J.J., Hosman, A.J., Donders, A.R., et al. A clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet 377 (2011), 1004–1010.
21. Wilson, J.R., Grossman, R.G., Frankowski, R.F., et al. A clinical prediction model for long-term functional outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury based on acute clinical and imaging factors. J Neurotrauma 13 (2012), 2263–2271.
22. Pretz, C.R., Kozlowski, A.J., Charlifue, S., Chen, Y., Heinemann, A.W., Using Rasch motor FIM individual growth curves to inform clinical decisions for persons with paraplegia. Spinal Cord 52 (2014), 671–676.
23. TM instrument), version 5.1, 1997, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo.
24. Rowland T, Ohno-Machado L, Ohrn A. Comparison of multiple prediction models for ambulation following spinal cord injury. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium; American Medical Informatics Association; 1998 Nov 7-11; Orlando. Hanley & Belfus, Inc. p 528-32.
25. Gant, V., Rodway, S., Wyatt, J., Artificial neural networks: practical considerations for clinical applications. Dybowski, R., Gant, V., (eds.) Clinical applications of artificial neural networks, 2001, Cambridge Univ Pr, Cambridge, 329–356.
26. Abdi, H., Valentin, D., Edelman, B., Neural networks. 1999, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
27. Caudill, M., Butler, C., Naturally intelligent systems. 1990, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
28. Muller, B., Reinhardt, J., Strickland, M.T., Neural networks: an introduction. 2nd ed., 1995, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
29. Garson, G.D., Neural networks: an introductory guide for social scientists. 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
30. Bradley, A.P., The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognit 30 (1997), 1145–1159.
31. Swets, J.A., Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: collected papers. 2014, Psychology Pr, New York.
32. McGee, S., Simplifying likelihood ratios. J Gen Intern Med 17 (2002), 647–650.
33. Florkowski, C.M., Sensitivity, specificity, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and likelihood ratios: communicating the performance of diagnostic tests. Clin Biochem Rev 29:Suppl 1 (2008), S83–S87.
34. Furlan, J.C., Fehlings, M.G., The impact of age on mortality, impairment, and disability among adults with acute traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 26 (2009), 1707–1717.
35. Scivoletto, G., Morganti, B., Dittuno, P., Ditunno, J.F., Molinari, M., Effects on age on spinal cord lesion patients' rehabilitation. Spinal Cord 41 (2003), 457–464.
36. Aito, S., D'Andrea, M., Werhagen, L., et al. Neurological and functional outcome in traumatic central cord syndrome. Spinal Cord 45 (2007), 292–297.
37. Cifu, D.X., Seel, R., Kreutzer, J., Martwitz, J., McKinley, W., Wisor, D., A multicenter investigation of age-related differences in lengths of stay, hospitalization charges, and outcomes for a matched tetraplegia sample. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 (1999), 733–740.
38. Katoh, S., el Masry, W.S., Motor recovery of patients presenting with motor paralysis and sensory sparing following cervical spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia 33 (1995), 506–509.
39. Oleson, C.V., Burns, A.S., Ditunno, J.F., Geisler, F.H., Coleman, W.P., Prognostic value of pinprick preservation in motor complete, sensory incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86 (2005), 988–992.
40. Samuel HW, Zaïane, OR, Sobsey D. Towards a definition of health informatics ethics. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium; 2010 Nov 11-12; Arlington. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2010. p 257-64.
41. Goodman, K.W., Adams, S., Berner, E.S., et al. AMIA's code of professional and ethical conduct. J Am Med Inform Assoc 20 (2013), 141–143.
42. Amarasingham, R., Audet, A., Bates, D., et al. Consensus statement on electronic health predictive analytics: a guiding framework to address challenges. EGEMS (Wash DC), 4, 2016, 1163.
43. Cohen, I.G., Amarasingham, R., Shah, A., Xie, B., Lo, B., The legal and ethical concerns that arise from using complex predictive analytics in health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 33 (2014), 1139–1147.