Coupling modified linear spectral mixture analysis and soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) models to simulate surface runoff: Application to the main Urban Area of Guangzhou, China

Water (Switzerland)

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2016, Pages

  Xu, Jianhui ^a   Zhao, Yi ^a,b,c   Zhong, Kaiwen ^a   Ruan, Huihua ^d   Liu, Xulong ^a  

^a GUANGZHOU INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY   (China)

^b GUANGZHOU INSTITUTE OF GEOCHEMISTRY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^d Guangdong Ecological Meteorology Center   (China)

Author keywords

Composite curve number; Linear spectral mixture analysis; Normalized difference built up index; Normalized difference vegetation index; Runoff

Indexed keywords

INFILTRATION; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; MIXTURES; RUNOFF; SOIL MOISTURE; SOILS; VEGETATION;

ANTECEDENT SOIL MOISTURE; COMPOSITE CURVES; ERRORS OF MISCLASSIFICATION; LAND SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS; LINEAR SPECTRAL MIXTURE ANALYSIS; NORMALIZED DIFFERENCE VEGETATION INDEX; NORMALIZED DIFFERENCES; SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE CURVE NUMBERS;

SOIL CONSERVATION;

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; IMAGE RESOLUTION; LAND SURFACE; LANDSAT; NDVI; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; RUNOFF; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SLOPE ANGLE; SOFTWARE; SOIL CONSERVATION; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL TYPE; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA;

CHINA; GUANGDONG; GUANGZHOU;

EID: 85002778845     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/w8120550     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Brabec, E.; Schulte, S.; Richards, P.L. Impervious surfaces and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. J. Plan. Lit. 2002, 16, 499-514.
2. Gao, G.Y.; Fu, B.J.; Lu, Y.H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhou, J.M. Coupling the modified SCS-CN and rusle models to simulate hydrological effects of restoring vegetation in the loess plateau of China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16, 2347-2364.
3. Yao, L.;Wei, W.; Yu, Y.; Xiao, J.; Chen, L. Research on potential runoffrisk of urban functional zones in beijing city based on GIS and RS. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2015, 70, 308-318.
4. National Engineering Handbook. 2009. Available online: http://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/OpenNon WebContent.aspx?content=22526.wba (accessed on 26 January 2009).
5. Ponce, V.M.; Hawkins, R.H. Runoffcurve number: Has it reached maturity? J. Hydrol. Eng. 1996, 1, 11-19.
6. Geetha, K.; Mishra, S.K.; Eldho, T.I.; Rastogi, A.K.; Pandey, R.P. SCS-CN-based continuous simulation model for hydrologic forecasting. Water Resour. Manag. 2007, 22, 165-190.
7. Anubha, T.; Singh, A.K.; Vaishya, R.C. SCS CN runoffestimation for vindhyachal region using remote sensing and GIS. Int. J. Adv. Remote Sens. GIS 2015, 4, 1214-1223.
8. Xiao, B.; Wang, Q.-H.; Fan, J.; Han, F.-P.; Dai, Q.-H. Application of the SCS-CN model to runoffestimation in a small watershed with high spatial heterogeneity. Pedosphere 2011, 21, 738-749.
9. Choi, J.; Engel, B.A.; Chung, H.W. Daily streamflow modelling and assessment based on the curve-number technique. Hydrol. Process. 2002, 16, 3131-3150.
10. Soulis, K.X.; Dercas, N. Development of a gis-based spatially distributed continuous hydrological model and its first application. Water Int. 2009, 32, 177-192.
11. Neitsch, S.L.; Arnold, J.G.; Kiniry, J.R.; Williams, J.R. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation: Version 2009; Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report 406; Texas A & M University System: College Station, TX, USA, 2009.
12. Harbor, J.M. A practical method for estimating the impact of land-use change on surface runoff, groundwater recharge and wetland hydrology. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2007, 60, 95-108.
13. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS, User's Manual; Version 4.0; United States Army Corps of Engineers: Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
14. Sharpley, A.N.;Williams, J.R. Epic-Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator: 1. Model Documentation; Technical Bulletin 1768; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1990; p. 235.
15. Young, R.A.; Onstad, C.A.; Bosch, D.D.; Anderson, W.P. Agnps: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. J. Soil Water Conserv. 1989, 44, 168-173.
16. Rejani, R.; Rao, K.V.; Osman, M.; Chary, G.R.; Pushpanjali; Reddy, K.S.; Rao, C.S. Spatial and temporal estimation of runoffin a semi-arid microwatershed of Southern India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187.
17. Suribabu, C.R.; Bhaskar, J. Evaluation of urban growth effects on surface runoffusing SCS-CN method and green-ampt infiltration model. Earth Sci. Inf. 2014, 8, 609-626.
18. Kowalik, T.; Walega, A. Estimation of cn parameter for small agricultural watersheds using asymptotic functions. Water 2015, 7, 939-955.
19. Fu, S.;Wang, H.;Wang, X.; Yuan, A.; Lu, B. The runoffcurve number of SCS-CN method in Beijing. Geogr. Res. 2013, 32, 797-807.
20. Lal, M.; Mishra, S.K.; Pandey, A. Physical verification of the effect of land features and antecedent moisture on runoffcurve number. Catena 2015, 133, 318-327.
21. Ajmal, M.; Moon, G.-W.; Ahn, J.-H.; Kim, T.-W. Investigation of SCS-CN and its inspired modified models for runoffestimation in South Korean watersheds. J. Hydro-Environ. Res. 2015, 9, 592-603.
22. Ajmal, M.;Waseem, M.; Ahn, J.; Kim, T. Runoffestimation using the nrcs slope-adjusted curve number in mountainous watersheds. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE 2016, 142, 04016002.
23. Jeon, J.-H.; Lim, K.; Engel, B. Regional calibration of SCS-CN l-thia model: Application for ungauged basins. Water 2014, 6, 1339-1359.
24. Deshmukh, D.S.; Chaube, U.C.; Hailu, A.E.; Gudeta, D.A.; Kassa, M.T. Estimation and comparision of curve numbers based on dynamic land use land cover change, observed rainfall-runoffdata and land slope. J. Hydrol. 2013, 492, 89-101.
25. Soulis, K.X.; Valiantzas, J.D.; Dercas, N.; Londra, P.A. Analysis of the runoffgeneration mechanism for the investigation of the SCS-CN method applicability to a partial area experimental watershed. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2009, 6, 373-400.
26. Soulis, K.X.; Valiantzas, J.D. Identification of the SCS-CN parameter spatial distribution using rainfall-runoffdata in heterogeneous watersheds. Water Resour. Manag. 2012, 27, 1737-1749.
27. Soulis, K.X.; Valiantzas, J.D. SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoffdata in heterogeneous watersheds-The two-CN system approach. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16, 1001-1015.
28. Grunwald, S.; Norton, L.D. Calibration and validation of a non-point source pollution model. Agric. Water Manag. 2000, 45, 17-39.
29. Ludlow, C.D. Flood Modeling in a Data-Poor Region: A Satellite Data-Supported Model for Accra, Ghana; George Washington University: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
30. Fan, F.; Deng, Y.; Hu, X.; Weng, Q. Estimating composite curve number using an improved SCS-CN method with remotely sensed variables in Guangzhou, China. Remote Sens. 2013, 5, 1425-1438.
31. Paudel, M.; Nelson, E.J.; Scharffenberg, W. Comparison of lumped and quasi-distributed clark runoffmodels using the SCS curve number equation. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2009, 14, 1098-1106.
32. Bhaduri, B.L.; Minner, M.; Tatalovich, S.; Harbor, J. Long-term hydrologic impact of urbanization: A tale of two models. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2001, 127, 13-19.
33. Grove, M.; Harbor, J.; Engel, B.A. Composite vs. Distributed curve numbers: Effects on estimates of storm runoffdepths. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1998, 34, 1015-1023.
34. Zhang, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, J. Assessing the long-term impact of urbanization on run-offusing a remote-sensing-supported hydrological model. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2015, 36, 5336-5352.
35. Zhang, Y.; Harris, A.; Balzter, H. Characterizing fractional vegetation cover and land surface temperature based on sub-pixel fractional impervious surfaces from landsat TM/ETM+. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2015, 36, 4213-4232.
36. Yang, J.; Li, P. Impervious surface extraction in urban areas from high spatial resolution imagery using linear spectral unmixing. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2015, 1, 61-71.
37. Mayes, M.T.; Mustard, J.F.; Melillo, J.M. Forest cover change in miombo woodlands: Modeling land cover of african dry tropical forests with linear spectral mixture analysis. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 165, 203-215.
38. Thouvenin, P.; Dobigeon, N.; Tourneret, J. Hyperspectral unmixing with spectral variability using a perturbed linear mixing model. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2016, 64, 525-538.
39. Yang, J.; He, Y. Automated mapping of impervious surfaces in urban and suburban areas: Linear spectral unmixing of high spatial resolution imagery. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2017, 54, 53-64.
40. Ma, L.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, X. Two-step constrained nonlinear spectral mixture analysis method for mitigating the collinearity effect. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2016, 54, 2873-2886.
41. Li, M.; Zang, S.;Wu, C.; Deng, Y. Segmentation-based and rule-based spectral mixture analysis for estimating urban imperviousness. Adv. Space Res. 2015, 55, 1307-1315.
42. Li, W.;Wu, C. Incorporating land use land cover probability information into endmember class selections for temporal mixture analysis. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2015, 101, 163-173.
43. Wu, C.; Murray, A.T. Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 84, 493-505.
44. Wu, C. Normalized spectral mixture analysis for monitoring urban composition using ETM+ imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 93, 480-492.
45. Lu, D.; Weng, Q. Use of impervious surface in urban land-use classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 102, 146-160.
46. Fan, F.; Fan, W.; Weng, Q. Improving urban impervious surface mapping by linear spectral mixture analysis and using spectral indices. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2015, 41, 577-586.
47. United States Geological Survey Homepage. Available online: https://espa.cr.usgs.gov/(accessed on 18 October 2015).
48. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Urban Hydrology for SmallWatersheds (TR-55 Rev.); Technical Release 55; USDA:Washington, DC, USA, 1986.
49. Adams, J.L.; Sabol, D.E.; Kapos, V.; Filho, R.A.; Roberts, D.A.; Smith, M.O.; Gillespie, A.R. Classification of multispectral images based on fractions of endmembers: Application to land-cover change in the Brazilian Amazon. Remote Sens. Environ. 1995, 52, 137-154.
50. Xu, H. A study on information extraction of water body with the modified normalized difference water index (mndwi). J. Remote Sens. 2005, 9, 589-595.
51. Zha, Y.; Gao, J.P.; Ni, S. Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2010, 24, 583-594.
52. Sobrino, J.A.; Jimenezmunoz, J.C.; Paolini, L. Land surface temperature retrieval from landsat TM 5. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 90, 434-440.
53. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS). Estimation of Direct Runofffrom Storm Rainfall. In National Engineering Handbook; USDA-SCS:Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
54. Hawkins, R.H.; Hjelmfelt, A.T.; Zevenbergen, A.W. Runoffprobability, storm depth, and curve numbers. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE 1985, 111, 330-340.
55. Huang, M.; Gallichand, J.;Wang, Z.; Goulet, M. A modification to the soil conservation service curve number method for steep slopes in the loess plateau of China. Hydrol. Process. 2006, 20, 579-589.
56. Quan, R.-S.; Liu, M.; Lu, M.; Zhang, L.-J.; Wang, J.-J.; Xu, S.-Y. Waterlogging risk assessment based on land use/cover change: A case study in pudong new area, Shanghai. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 61, 1113-1121.