Participatory visioning in transport backcasting studies: Methodological lessons from Andalusia (Spain)

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 58, Issue , 2017, Pages 113-126

  Soria Lara, Julio A ^a,b   Banister, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Futures; Public participation; Scenarios; Stakeholders; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

FUTURE PROSPECT; METHODOLOGY; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

ANDALUCIA; SPAIN;

EID: 85002605039     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Agencia Andaluza de la Energia, World Energy Outlook 2014. 2014, OECD/IEA, Paris Available at: https://www.agenciaandaluzadelaenergia.es/.
2. Aggarwal, P., Jain, S., Energy demand and CO 2 emissions from urban on-road transport in Delhi: current and future projections under various policy measures. J. Clean. Prod. 128 (2014), 48–61.
3. Åkerman, J., Höjer, M., How much transport can the climate stand?—Sweden on a sustainable path in 2050. Energ Policy 34:14 (2006), 1944–1957.
4. Amer, M., Daim, T.U., Jetter, A., A review of scenario planning. Futures 46 (2013), 23–40.
5. 2 emissions by 2050. Energ Policy 41 (2012), 584–598.
6. Banister, D., Hickman, R., Transport futures: thinking the unthinkable. Transp. Policy 29 (2013), 283–293.
7. Banister, D., Dreborg, K., Hedberg, L., Hunhammar, S., Steen, P., Akerman, J., Transport policy scenarios for the EU: 2020 images of the future. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 13:1 (2000), 27–45.
8. Bertolini, L., Evolutionary urban transportation planning: an exploration. Environ. Plan. A 39:8 (2007), 1998–2019.
9. Bishop, P., Hines, A., Collins, T., The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight 9:1 (2007), 5–25.
10. Bryman, A., Social Research Methods. 2012, Oxford University Press.
11. Chermack, T., Lynham, S.A., Ruona, W., A review of scenario planning literature. Futur. Res. Q. 17:2 (2001), 7–31.
12. Curtis, C., Integrating land use with public transport: The use of a discursive accessibility tool to inform metropolitan spatial planning in Perth. Transp. Rev. 31:2 (2011), 179–197.
13. Geurs, K., Van Wee, B., Backcasting as a tool to develop a sustainable transport scenario assuming emission reductions of 80–90%. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 13:1 (2000), 47–62.
14. Habermas, J., Classical pragmatism and communicative action. Hickman, L.A., (eds.) Pragmatism as Post-postmodernism: Lessons from John Dewey, 21, 2007, Fordham Univ Press.
15. 2 emissions in the UK by 2030. Transp. Policy 14:5 (2007), 377–387.
16. Hickman, R., Banister, D., Transport, Climate Change and the City. 2014, Routledge.
17. Hickman, R., Ashiru, O., Banister, D., Achieving carbon-efficient transportation: backcasting from London. Transp. Res. Rec. 2139 (2009), 172–182.
18. Hickman, R., Ashiru, O., Banister, D., Transitions to low carbon transport futures: strategic conversations from London and Delhi. J. Transp. Geogr. 19:6 (2011), 1553–1562.
19. Hsu, C.C., Sandford, B.A., The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 12:10 (2007), 1–8.
20. Innes, J.E., Booher, D.E., Planning With Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. 2010, Routledge.
21. Instituto de Estadistica de Andalucia (IEA), Proyección de la población de Andalucía, provincias y ámbitos subregionales 2013–2070. Available at: http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia./proyecciones/proyecc/index.htm, 2012.
22. Kezar, A., Maxey, D., The Delphi technique: an untapped approach of participatory research. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 19:2 (2016), 143–160.
23. Markus, R., Jonsson, R.D., Assessment of transport policies toward future emission targets: a backcasting approach for Stockholm 2030. JEAPM 8:04 (2006), 451–478.
24. Mattila, T., Antikainen, R., Backcasting sustainable freight transport systems for Europe in 2050. Energ Policy 39:3 (2011), 1241–1248.
25. Neuman, W.L., Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 13, 2005, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
26. Olsson, L., Hjalmarsson, L., Wikström, M., Larsson, M., Bridging the implementation gap: combining backcasting and policy analysis to study renewable energy in urban road transport. Transp. Policy 37 (2015), 72–82.
27. Peeters, P., Dubois, G., Tourism travel under climate change mitigation constraints. J. Transp. Geogr. 18:3 (2010), 447–457.
28. Schade, B., Schade, W., Evaluating economic feasibility and technical progress of environmentally sustainable transport scenarios by a backcasting approach with ESCOT. Transp. Rev. 25:6 (2005), 647–668.
29. Shiftan, Y., Kaplan, S., Hakkert, S., Scenario building as a tool for planning a sustainable transportation system. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 8:5 (2003), 323–342.
30. Soria-Lara, J.A., Valenzuela-Montes, L.M., Más allá de la estructura urbana y del patrón de viaje. El “entorno de movilidad” como instrumento para la planificación y la evaluación. Bol. AGE 64 (2014), 273–296.
31. Soria-Lara, J.A., Valenzuela-Montes, L.M., Pinho, P., Using ‘mobility environments’ in practice: lessons from a metropolitan transit corridor in Spain. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 17:5 (2015), 553–572.
32. Soria-Lara, J.A., Aguilera-Benavente, F., Arranz-López, A., Integrating land use and transport practice through spatial metrics. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 91 (2016), 330–345.
33. Tuominen, A., Tapio, P., Varho, V., Järvi, T., Banister, D., Pluralistic backcasting: integrating multiple visions with policy packages for transport climate policy. Futures 60 (2014), 41–58.
34. 2 scenario technique—the case of transport and climate. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80:4 (2013), 611–630.
35. Vergragt, P.J., Quist, J., Backcasting for sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 78:5 (2011), 747–755.
36. Wangel, J., Change by whom? Four ways of adding actors and governance in backcasting studies. Futures 43:8 (2011), 880–889.
37. Willson, R., Assessing communicative rationality as a transportation planning paradigm. Transportation 28:1 (2001), 1–31.
38. 2 mitigation options. Energy Sustain. Dev. 15:4 (2011), 460–466.
39. Zimmermann, M., Darkow, I.L., Heiko, A., Integrating Delphi and participatory backcasting in pursuit of trustworthiness—the case of electric mobility in Germany. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 79:9 (2012), 1605–1621.