A spanner in the works? Anti-politics in global health policy: Comment on “A ghost in the machine? Politics in global health policy”

International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 151-153

  McCoy, David ^a   Singh, Guddi ^b  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anti politics; Global health governance; Global health policy; Politics

Indexed keywords

EID: 85002489656     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23225939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.77     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Bruen C, Brugha R. A Ghost in the Machine? Politics in Global Health Policy. Int J Health Policy Manag 2014; 3: 1–4. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.59
2. Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Interview: Richard Feachem. 2005 December 8 [cited 2014 May]. Foreign Policy. Available from: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/aids/interviews/feachem.html
3. Li T. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham: Duke University Press; 2007.
4. Ferguson J. The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘development’, depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis, Cambridge: University of Minneapolis Press, Cambridge University Press; 1990.
5. Mosse D. Cultivating Development. An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. London: Pluto Press; 2005.
6. Bebbington A. Donor–NGO Relations and Representations of Livelihood in Nongovernmental Aid Chains. World Development 2005; 33: 937–50.
7. Schedler A. Introduction. In Schedler A, editor. The End of Politics? Explorations into Modern Antipolitics. New York: Macmillan; 1997. p. 1–20.
8. McCoy D, Jensen N, Kranzer K, Ferrand RA, Korenromp EL. Methodological and Policy Limitations of Quantifying the Saving of Lives: A Case Study of the Global Fund’s Approach. PLoS Med 2013; 10: e1001522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.100152