Rhodococcus erythropolis cells adapt their fatty acid composition during biofilm formation on metallic and non-metallic surfaces

FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Volumn 91, Issue 12, 2015, Pages

  Rodrigues, Carlos J C ^a   de Carvalho, Carla C C R ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Biofilm; Cell adhesion; Cell hydrophobicity; Fatty acids; Surface properties

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; BACTERIUM; BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; BIOFILM; BIOMASS; FATTY ACID; GROWTH; HYDROPHOBICITY; MEMBRANE; PERMEABILITY; SURFACE AREA;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); RHODOCOCCUS ERYTHROPOLIS;

CULTURE MEDIUM; FATTY ACID; METAL;

BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BIOFILM; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CULTURE MEDIUM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RHODOCOCCUS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BACTERIAL ADHESION; BIOFILMS; CULTURE MEDIA; FATTY ACIDS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; METALS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RHODOCOCCUS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 85001871868     PISSN: 01686496     EISSN: 15746941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiv135     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Al Akhrass F, Al Wohoush I, Chaftari A-M, et al. Rhodococcus bacteremia in cancer patients is mostly catheter related and associated with biofilm formation. PLoS One 2012;7:e32945.
2. Bazaka K, Crawford RJ, Ivanova EP. Do bacteria differentiate between degrees of nanoscale surface roughness? Biotechnol J 2011;6:1103-14.
3. Beech IB, Sunner J. Biocorrosion: towards understanding interactions between biofilms and metals. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2004;15:181-6.
4. Benamara H, Rihouey C, Abbes I, et al. Characterization of membrane lipidome changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during biofilm growth on glass wool. PLoS One 2014;9:e108478.
5. Bendinger B, Rijnaarts HH, Altendorf K, et al. Physicochemical cell surface and adhesive properties of coryneform bacteria related to the presence and chain length of mycolic acids. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993;59:3973-7.
6. Boks NP, Norde W, van der Mei HC, et al. Forces involved in bacterial adhesion to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. Microbiology 2008;154:3122-33.
7. Booth SC, George IFS, Zannoni D, et al. Effect of aluminium and copper on biofilm development of Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes KF707 and P. fluorescens as a function of different media compositions. Metallomics 2013;5:723-35.
8. Conrad A, Kontro M, Keinänen M, et al. Fatty acids of lipid fractions in extracellular polymeric substances of activated sludge flocs. Lipids 2003;38:1093-105.
9. Cortes MALRM, de Carvalho CCCR. Effect of carbon sources on lipid accumulation in Rhodococcus cells. Biochem Eng J 2015;94:100-5.
10. Dalton HM, March PE. Molecular genetics of bacterial attachment and biofouling. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1998;9: 252-5.
11. de Carvalho CCCR. Biofilms: recent developments on an old battle. Recent Pat Biotechnol 2007;1:49-57.
12. de Carvalho CCCR. Adaptation of Rhodococcus erythropolis cells for growth and bioremediation under extreme conditions. Res Microbiol 2012a;163:125-36.
13. de Carvalho CCCR. Biofilms: new ideas for an old problem. Recent Pat Biotechnol 2012b;6:13-22.
14. de Carvalho CCCR, Caramujo MJ. Ancient procedures for the high-tech World: health benefits and antimicrobial compounds from the Mediterranean Empires. Open Biotechnol J 2008;2:235-46.
15. de Carvalho CCCR, da Cruz AA, Pons MN, et al. Mycobacterium sp., Rhodococcus erythropolis, and Pseudomonas putida behavior in the presence of organic solvents. Microsc Res Tech 2004;64: 215-22.
16. de Carvalho CCCR, da Fonseca MMR. The remarkable Rhodococcus erythropolis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2005;67:715-26.
17. de Carvalho CCCR, da Fonseca MMR. Preventing biofilm formation: promoting cell separation with terpenes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2007;61:406-13.
18. de Carvalho CCCR, Fernandes P. Production of metabolites as bacterial responses to the marine environment. Mar Drugs 2010;8:705-27.
19. de Carvalho CCCR, Parreno-Marchante B, Neumann G, et al. Adaptation of Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14 to growth on n-alkanes, alcohols and terpenes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2005;67:383-8.
20. de Carvalho CCCR, Wick LY, Heipieper HJ. Cell wall adaptations of planktonic and biofilm Rhodococcus erythropolis cells to growth on C5 to C16 n-alkane hydrocarbons. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009;82:311-20.
21. Denich TJ, Beaudette LA, Lee H, et al. Effect of selected environmental and physico-chemical factors on bacterial cytoplasmic membranes. J Microbiol Methods 2003;52: 149-82.
22. Donlan RM. Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis 2002;8:881-90.
23. Drelich J. Guidelines to measurements of reproducible contact angles using a sessile-drop technique. Surf Innov 2013;1:248- 54.
24. Dupont CL, Grass G, Rensing C. Copper toxicity and the origin of bacterial resistance-new insights and applications. Metallomics 2011;3:1109-18.
25. Flemming HC,Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010;8:623-33.
26. Fletcher M, Loeb GI. Influence of substratum characteristics on the attachment of a marine pseudomonad to solid surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 1979;37:67-72.
27. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004;2:95-108.
28. Jongman RHG, Braak CJFT, Tongeren OFRV. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
29. Kroukamp O, Dumitrache RG, Wolfaardt GM. Pronounced effect of the nature of the inoculum on biofilm development in flow systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010;76:6025-31.
30. Martin-Rodriguez A, Gonzalez-Orive A, Hernandez-Creus A, et al. On the influence of the culture conditions in bacterial antifouling bioassays and biofilm properties: Shewanella algae, a case study. BMC Microbiol 2014;14:102.
31. Mitik-Dineva N, Wang J, Mocanasu RC, et al. Impact of nanotopography on bacterial attachment. Biotechnol J 2008;3: 536-44.
32. Moraleda-Munoz A, Perez J, Fontes M, et al. Copper induction of carotenoid synthesis in the bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. Mol Microbiol 2005;56:1159-68.
33. O'Toole G, Kaplan HB, Kolter R. Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu Rev Microbiol 2000;54:49-79.
34. Ojha AK, Baughn AD, Sambandan D, et al. Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis biofilms containing free mycolic acids and harbouring drug-tolerant bacteria. Mol Microbiol 2008;69: 164-74.
35. Palmer JS, Flint SH, Schmid J, et al. The role of surface charge and hydrophobicity in the attachment of Anoxybacillus flavithermus isolated from milk powder. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2010;37:1111-9.
36. Pringle JH, Fletcher M. Influence of substratum wettability on attachment of freshwater bacteria to solid surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 1983;45:811-7.
37. Rainey PB, Rainey K. Evolution of cooperation and conflict in experimental bacterial populations. Nature 2003;425:72-4.
38. Rosenberg M, Kjelleberg S. Hydrophobic interactions: role in bacterial adhesion. Adv Microb Ecol 1986;9:353-93.
39. Russell NJ. Mechanisms of thermal adaptation in bacteria: blueprints for survival. Trends Biochem Sci 1984;9: 108-12.
40. Santo CE, Lam EW, Elowsky CG, et al. Bacterial killing by dry metallic copper surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011;77:794- 802.
41. Simões LC, Simões M, Vieira MJ. Adhesion and biofilm formation on polystyrene by drinking water-isolated bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2010;98:317-29.
42. van derWerf MJ, Swarts HJ, de Bont JAM. Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14 contains a novel degradation pathway for limonene. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999;65:2092-102.
43. van Oss CJ. Hydrophobicity of biosurfaces-Origin, quantitative determination and interaction energies. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 1995;5:91-110.
44. Vrolijk NH, Targett NM, Baier RE, et al. Surface characterisation of two gorgonian coral species: Implications for a natural antifouling defence. Biofouling 1990;2:39-54.
45. Walker SL, Redman JA, Elimelech M. Role of cell surface lipopolysaccharides in Escherichia coli K12 adhesion and transport. Langmuir 2004;20:7736-46.
46. Watson Marlow. Marprene Tubing. http://www.axflow. com/global/pumps/watson%20marlow/tubing/maprene% 20tubing.pdf (23 March 23 2015, date last accessed) Wick LY, Ruiz de Munain A, Springael D, et al. Responses of Mycobacterium sp. LB501T to the low bioavailability of solid anthracene. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2002;58: 378-85.
47. Zhang H, Cloud A. The permeability characteristics of silicone rubber. In 38th SAMPE Fall Technical Conference: Global Advances in Materials and Process Engineering. Dallas, TX: Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, 2006.