E-Government:: A Comparative Study of the G2C Online Services Progress Using Multi-Criteria Analysis

International Journal of Decision Support System Technology

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1-12

  Yannacopoulos, Denis ^a   Manolitzas, Panagiotis ^b   Spyridakos, Athanasios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST ATTICA   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

e Government; Internet; Multi Criteria Analysis; Sophistication Levels; Web Based Services

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001816373     PISSN: 19416296     EISSN: 1941630X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jdsst.2010100101     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Angehrn A., Luthi H. (1990). Intelligence Decision Support Systems: A Visual Interactive Approach. Interfaces, 20(6), 17–28. 10.1287/inte.20.6.17
2. Breton A. (1998). Competitive Government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Davis R. (1999). The Web Politics: The Internets Impact on the American Political System. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Denning P. J. (2001). The Profession of IT: Who Are We? Communications of the ACM, 44(2), 15–19. 10.1145/359205.359239
5. Dunleavy P., Margetts H., Bastow S., Tinkler J. (2006). Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, The State and e-government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6. European Commission. (2002). Consultation Document for a Future Policy paper on Pan-European Government e-Service. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
7. European Commission. (2003). e-Europe awards for e-Government-2003: Exhibition catalogue. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
8. European Commission. (2005). Working Paper on e-Government Beyond 2005: An Overview of Policy Issues. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
9. European Commission. (2007). Online Availability of Public Services: How is Europe Progressing. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
10. European Commission. (2008). e-Government in the European Countries. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
11. Jacquet-Lagreze E., Meziani R. (1987). MOLP interactive assessment of a piewise utility function. European Journal of Operational Research, 16(1), 350–357. 10.1016/0377–2217(87)90044–0
12. Jacquet-Lagreze E., Siskos J. (1982). Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making, the UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 10(2), 151–164. 10.1016/0377–2217(82)90155–2
13. Jellasi, M. T. (1986). MCDM-From stand alone methods to integrated and intelligent DSS. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making (Vol. 1, pp. 250–262).
14. Keeney R. (1992). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Keeney R., Raifa H. (1976). Decision with multiple objectives: preference and value trade-offs. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
16. Kefis B. (2006). Providing electronic services from the government to the businesses, The Greek Reality. Management Review, 38, 47–55.
17. Korhonen P., Laasko J. (1986). A visual interactive method for solving the multicriteria problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2), 277–287. 10.1016/0377–2217(86)90050–0
18. OECD. (2003). The e-government imperative. Paris, France: OECD Publications Service.
19. OECD. (2005). E-government for Better Government. Paris, France: OECD Publications Service.
20. Roy B. (1985). Methodologie multicritere d’ aide a la decision. Paris, France: Economica.
21. Roy B. (1989). The outranking approach and the foundations of Electre methods. Paris, France: Universite Paris-Dauphine.
22. Siskos J., Spyridakos A., Yannacopoulos D. (1993). MINORA: A Decision aiding system for discrete alternatives. Journal of Information Science and Technology, 1(2), 136–149.
23. Siskos J., Yannacopoulos D. (1985). UTASTAR, an ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigacao Operacional, 5(1), 39–53.
24. Spyridakos, A. (1996). Development of Multi-criteria INteractive Ordinal Regresion Analysis System. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Technical University of Crete.
25. Spyridakos, A., & Kekes, I. (2008, June). Towards an evaluation model for educational software analyzing evaluators behavior through the multicriteria disaggregation – aggregation approach. Paper presented at the National Conference in Tourism Management, Spetses, Greece.
26. Spyridakos, A., & Yannacopoulos, D. (1994). A Visual Approach to the Procedures of Multicriteria Intelligence Decision Aiding Systems. Chania, Crete: Technical University of Crete.
27. United Nations. (2003). World Public Sector Report 2003: e-government at the Crossroads. New York, NY: Author.
28. United Nations. (2004). UN Global e-Government Readiness Report 2004. New York, NY: Author.
29. United Nations. (2008). e-Government Survey 2008. New York, NY: Author.
30. Vanderprooten D. (1989). The Interavtive approach in MCDA: A technical framework and some basic conceptions. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 12(10), 1213–1220. 10.1016/0895–7177(89)90363–4
31. West D. M. (2005). Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.