Multimodal Modeling, Analysis, and Validation of Open Source Software Development Processes

International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering (IJITWE)

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 49-63

  Scacchi, Walt ^a   Jensen, Chris ^a   Noll, John ^b   Elliott, Margaret ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Computer Science and Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

empirical studies of software engineering; open source software development; process modeling; requirements processes; software process

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001755065     PISSN: 15541045     EISSN: 15541053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jitwe.2006070104     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bolchini, D., & Paolini, P. (2004). Goal-driven requirements analysis for hypermedia-intensive Web applications. Requirements Engineering, 9, 85–103.
2. Clarke, A.E. (2003). Situational analysis: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 553–576.
3. Cockburn, A. (2001). Writing effective use cases. New York: Addison-Wesley.
4. Curtis, B., Krasner, H., & Iscoe, N. (1998). A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31(11), 1268–1287.
5. Dicks, B., & Mason, B. (1998). Hypermedia and ethnography: Reflections on the construction of a research approach. Sociological Research Online, 3(3). Retrieved June 9, 2006, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk
6. Elliott, M., & Scacchi, W. (2003, November). Free software developers as an occupational community: Resolving conflicts and fostering collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 21–30), Sanibel Island, Florida.
7. Elliott, M., & Scacchi, W. (2005). Free software development: Cooperation and conflict in a virtual organizational culture. In S. Koch (Ed.), Free/open source software development (pp. 152–172). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
8. Finkelstein, A.C.W., Gabbay, D., Hunter, A., & Nuseibeh, B. (1994). Inconsistency handling in multi-perspective specifications. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(8), 569–578.
9. Gans, G., Jarke, M., Kethers, S., & Lakemeyer, G. (2003). Continuous requirements management for organisation networks: A (dis)trust-based approach. Requirements Engineering, 8, 4–22.
10. Gasser, L., Scacchi, W., Penne, B., & Sandusky, R. (2003, December). Understanding continuous design in OSS projects. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software & Systems Engineering and their Applications, Paris, France.
11. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.
12. Grinter, R.E. (2003). Recomposition: Coordinating a web of software dependencies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12(3), 297–327.
13. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Jensen, C., & Scacchi, W. (2005a, January). Collaboration, leadership, control, and conflict management in the NetBeans. org community. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Waikola Village, Hawaii.
15. Jensen, C., & Scacchi, W. (2005b, July-September). Process modeling across the Web information infrastructure. Software Process–Improvement and Practice, 10(3), 255–272.
16. Kitchenham, B.A., Dyba, T., & Jorgensen, M. (2004). Evidence-based software engineering. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 273–281), Edinburgh, Scotland. IEEE Computer Society.
17. Leite, J.C.S.P., & Freeman, P.A. (1991). Requirements validation through viewpoint resolution. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17(12), 1253–1269.
18. Mi, P., & Scacchi, W. (1996). A meta-model for formulating knowledge-based models of software development. Decision Support Systems, 17(4), 313–330.
19. Monk, A., & Howard, S. (1998, March-April). The rich picture: A tool for reasoning about work context. Interactions, 5(2), 21–30.
20. Narayanan, N.H., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies, 57, 279–315.
21. Noll, J., & Scacchi, W. (2001). Specifying process-oriented hypertext for organizational computing. Journal of Network & Computer Applications, 24(1), 39–61.
22. Noy, N.F., Sintek, M., Decker, S., Crubezy, M., Fergerson, R.W., & Musen, M.A. (2001, March-April). Creating semantic Web contents with Protégé-2000. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2), 60–71.
23. Nuseibeh, B., & Easterbrook, S. (2000). Requirements engineering: A roadmap. In A. Finkelstein (Ed.), The future of software engineering. ACM and IEEE Computer Society Press.
24. Oza, M., Nistor, E., Hu, S. Jensen, C., & Scac-chi, W. (2004, February). A first look at the Netbeans requirements and release process. Retrieved June 9, 2006, from http://www.ics.uci.edu/cjensen/papers/ FirstLookNetBeans/
25. Rao, R. (2003, November). From unstructured data to actionable intelligence. IT Pro, pp. 29–35.
26. Scacchi, W. (2002, February). Understanding the requirements for developing open source software systems. IEE Proceedings on Software, 149(1), 24–39.
27. Scacchi, W. (2004, January). Free/open source software development practices in the computer game community. IEEE Software, 21(1), 59–67.
28. Scacchi, W. (2005). Socio-technical interaction networks in free/open source software development processes. In S.T. Acuña & N. Juristo (Eds.), Peopleware and the software process (pp. 1–27). World Scientific Press.
29. Seaman, C.B. (1999). Qualitative methods in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25(4), 557–572.
30. Spinuzzi, C., & Zachry, M. (2000, August). Genre ecologies: An open system approach to understanding and constructing documentation. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, 24(3), 169–181.
31. Truex, D., Baskerville, R., & Klein, H. (1999). Growing systems in an emergent organization. Communications of the ACM, 42(8), 117–123.
32. Viller, S., & Sommerville, I. (2000). Ethno-graphically informed analysis for software engineers. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 53, 169–196.