Managing Organizational Data Resources: Quality Dimensions

Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ)

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 5-13

  Yoon, Victoria Y ^a   Aiken, Peter ^b   Guimaraes, Tor ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001720253     PISSN: 10401628     EISSN: 15337979     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/irmj.2000070101     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aiken, P. (1996). Data Reverse Engineering, New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Aiken, P., Muntz, A., & Russ Richards (1994). DoD legacy systems: Reverse engineering data requirements, Communications of the ACM, 37(5), 26–41.
3. Aiken P. & Yoon, Y. (1999). Requirements driven data Information & Management, 35(3), 155–168.
4. Appleton, D. (1984). Business rules: The missing link, Datamation, 30(16), 145–150.
5. Ballou, D. and Tayi, G. (1989). Methodology for allocating resources for data quality enhancement, Information & Management, 32(3), 319–329.
6. Broussard, S. (1994). Data Quality Engineering Handbook, Defense Logistics Agency, Alexandria, VA.
7. Deloitte & Touche (1996). Leading Trends in Information Services - Eighth Annual Survey ofNorth American Chief Information Executives - 1996, Wilton, CT.
8. English, Larry P. (1996). Help for data quality problems - A number of automated tools can ease data cleansing and help improve data quality, InformationWeek, (600). (Online edition at http://www.informationweek.com)
9. Foley, John, (1996). Databases - Towering terabytes - Fast growing data warehouses are reaching terabyte size and creating a new elite among corporations, InformationWeek, (599). (Online edition at http://www.informationweek.com)
10. Fox, C., Levitin A., & Redman, T. (1994). The notion of data and its quality dimensions, Information Processing and Management, 30(1), 9–19.
11. General Accounting Office (1976). Improvements Still Needed in Federal Energy Data Collection, Analysis and Reporting, OSP-76–21; B-178205, Washington,D.C.
12. Guimaraes, T. (1988). Information resources management: Improving the focus, Information Resource Management Journal, 1(1), 10–21.
13. Knight, B. (1992). The data pollution, Computerworld, September 28, 80–84.
14. Laudon, K. (1986). Data quality and due process in large interorganizational record systems, Communications of the ACM, 29(19), 4–11.
15. Levitin, A. & Redman, T. (1993). Models of data (life) cycle with applications to quality, Information and Software Technology, 35(3), 216–223.
16. Liepins, G. (1989). Sound data are a sound investment, Quality Process, 61–64.
17. Loebl, A. (1990), Accuracy and relevance and the quality of data” in (edited by Liepins, G.E. and Uppuluri, V.R.R.) Data Quality Control: Theory and Practices, New Y ork, Marcel Dekker, 105–143.
18. Morey, R. (1982), Estimating and improving the quality of information in a MIS, Communications of the ACM,25(5), 337–342.
19. O'Brien, J. (1993). Management Information Systems: A Managerial End User Perspective, Englewood Cliffs New Jersey, Irwin.
20. Panettieri, J. (1995). Security -The good news, InformationWeek, (555), 32.
21. Porter, M.E. & Millar, V.E. (1995). How information gives you competitive advantage, Harvard Business Review, 75(4),149–160.
22. Redman, T. (1992). Data Quality Managment and Technology, Bantam Books.
23. Reingruber, M. & Gregory, W. (1994). The data modeling handbook: A best practice approach to building quality data models, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
24. Spewak, Steven H. (1993). Enterprise Architecture Planning, Boston, QED Publishing.
25. Tsichritzis, D. & Fochovsky, F. (1982). Data Models, Engelwood Cliffs NJ, Prentice Hall.
26. Tufte, E. (1990). Chartjunk and the Challenger, insert materials accompanying the text, Envisioning Information Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
27. Wilson, L. (1992). Devil in your data, InformationWeek, 48–54.
28. Zachman, John. Business Systems Planning and Business Information Control Study: A Comparison, IBM Systems Journal 21(1), 31–53.