A Heuristic Model to Implement Government-to-Government Projects

International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR)

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-18

  Joia, Luis Antonio ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Brazil; e government; government to government; public administration; Web services

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001655007     PISSN: 15483886     EISSN: 15483894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2007010101     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andersen K.V. (1999). Reengineering public sector organizations using information technology. In R. Heeks (Ed.) Reinventing government in the information Age (pp. 312–330) Routledge.
2. Ansoff, H.I. (1984). Implanting strategic management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Badaracco J. (1991). Knowledge links. In The knowledge link: How frms compete through strategic alliances, Harvard Business School Press.
4. Bahrami, H. (1992). The emerging fexible organization: Perspectives from Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 34(4).
5. Baker W. (1994). Building intelligent networks. In Networking smart, McGraw-Hill, Inc.
6. Canuto O. (2000). O comércio eletrônico e a mobilidade dos gansos.
7. Jornal Valor. São Paulo, September 12, 2000. In:, available on 05/25/200.
8. Checkland P. & Holwell S. (1998). Action research: Its nature and validity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(1), 13–16.
9. Christensen C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma. Harvard Business School Press.
10. Dick R.(1999). What is action research, 1999. Retreived July 29, 2002 from,: http: //www. scu.edu. au/schools/gcm/ar/ whatisar.html
11. Endler A. (2001). Governo Eletrônico - A Internet como ferramenta de gestão dos serviços públicos. Retreived from http://read.adm.ufrgs.br/read14/artigo/ artigo1.pdf on 12/26/2001.
12. E-GOV (2000) 1° Semin´rio Governo na Internet. Brasília: Rede Governo, 2 CD-ROM.
13. Einsenhardt K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
14. Garvin D. (1998). The Process of organization and management Sloan Management Review, Summer.
15. Ginzberg M.J. (1975). Implementation as a process of change: A framework and empirical study. Rept. CISR-13, Center for Information System Research, MIT, Cambridge.
16. Haeckel, S. & Nolan, R. (1993). Managing by wire. Harvard Business Review, September-October, 122–132.
17. Hammer M. (2001). The supereffcient company. Harvard Business Review, September, 82–91.
18. ITAC(2002). Electronic government - The government of Canada as a model knowledge-based enterprise. Retreived January 6, 2002 from http://www.itac.ca/client/ITAC/ITAC_UW_MainEngine.nsf/0/ 19f4c6b8e8a6bbf58525681000622b1f/ $FILE/pp991015.pdf
19. Joia, L.A. (1998). Large-scale re engineering on project documentation at engineering consultancy companies. International Journal of Information Management, 18(3), 215–224.
20. Joia, L.A. & Zamot F. (2002). Internet-based reverse auctions by the Brazilian government. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (9), 1–12. Retrieved September 29, 2002 from http://www.ejisdc. org.
21. JUDNET (2001). Troca de informações entre o Poder Judiciário e o Sistema Fi-nanceiro Nacional (Sistema JUDNET). In: . Available on 12/18/2001.
22. Keen, P.G.W. (1980). Information systems and organizational change, Rept. CISR-46, Center for Information System Research, MIT, Cambridge.
23. Keen, P.G.W. (1991). Shaping the future, Harvard Business School Press.
24. Kieley B., Lane G., Paquet G. & Roy J. (2001). E-government in canada - services online or public service renewal. Retreived December 28, 2001 from
25. Kling R. (1980). Social analyses of computing: theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. Comp. Surv. 12, 1, pp. 61–110.
26. Kraemer K.L. & Dedrick J. (1997). Computing and public organizations, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 1, pp. 89–112.
27. Lenk K. & Traunmüller R. (2001). Broadening the concept of electronic government. In J.E.J. Prins (Ed.)Designing E-government, Kluwer Law International, 63–74.
28. Maturana, H. & Varela, F.J. (1980) Auto-poiesis and cognition: The realization of the living, Reidl, London.
29. Morra L. & Friedlander A.C. (1999). Case study evaluations, OED (Operations Evaluation Department) Working Paper Series No. 2, May, World Bank.
30. Perri 6 (2001). E-governance. Do digital aids make a difference in policy making? In E.J. Prins (Ed.) Designing e-government, Kluwer Law International, 7–27
31. Porter M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. NY: Free Press.
32. Venkatraman N. (1994). IT - enable business transformation: From automation to business scope redefnition. Sloan Management Review, 35(2), 73–87.
33. West D. & Stansfeld M. H. (2001). Structuring action and refection in information systems action research studies using checkland's fma model. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 14(3), 251–281.
34. Winter S. (1998). Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In Klein D. (Ed.) The strategic management of intellectual capital, (pp. 165–187), But-terworth-Heinemann.
35. Yin R. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks, California.
36. Zweers K & Planqué K. (2001). Electronic government. From a organizational based perspective towards a client oriented approach. In J.E.J. Prins J.E.J. (Ed.) Designing E-Government, Kluwer Law International, 92.