Oracle erp and network computing architecture: Implementation and performance

Information Systems Management

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 53-69

  Palaniswamy, Rajagopal ^a   Frank, Tyler G ^b  

^a Michigan Te hnological University   (United States)

^b NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001549140     PISSN: 10580530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1201/1078/43200.19.2.20020228/35140.6     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Beatty, C., and Gordon, J., 1988. Barriers to the implementation of CAD/CAM systems. Sloan Management Review, 29 (4) Summer:25
2. Bingi, P., Sharma, M., and Godla, J., 1999. Critical issues affecting ERP implementation. Information Systems Management, 16 (3) Summer:7
3. Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, M., 1998. Beyond the productivity paradox & Computers are the catalyst for bigger changes. Communications of the ACM, 41 August:49
4. Chengalur-Smith, S., and Duchessi, P., 1999. The initiation and adoption of client-server technology in organizations. Information and Management,:77
5. Cooke, D. P., and Peterson, W. J., SAP implementation:strategies and results. New York, NY:Conference Board.
6. Cooper, R., and Zmud, R., 1990. Information technology implementation research:a technological diffusion approach. Management Science, 36 (2):123
7. Davenport, T., 1998. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, 76 (4) July-August:121
8. Dhar, V., and Stein, R. 1997. Seven Methods for Transforming Corporate Data into Business Intelligence, Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
9. Edwards, J., 1999. Three tier client/server at work, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
10. Henderson, J., and Venkatraman, N., 1990s. “ Strategic alignment:A model for organizational transformation via transformation technology in information technology and the corporation of the ”. Edited by:Allen, T., and Scott Morton, M., 202Oxford University Press. 1994
11. Hernandez, J., 1997. The SAP R/3 Handbook, New York:McGraw-Hill.
12. 1998. Global Survey of Chief Information Executives, New York:Deloitte and Touche Consulting Group.
13. Grover, V., Teng, J., Segars, A., and Fiedler, K., 1998. The influence of information technology and business process changes in perceived productivity:the IS executive's perspective. Infor-mation and Management, 34 (3):141
14. Ives, B., and Jarvenpaa, S., 1993. Organizing for global competition:The fit of information technology. Decision Sciences, 24 (3) May/June:547
15. Kaplan, B., and Duchon, D., 1988. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research:a case study. MIS Quarterly, Dec.:571
16. Kwon, T., and Zmud, R., 1987. “ Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation ”. Edited by:Boland and Hirschheim. New York:John Wiley. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research
17. Langenwalter, G., 2000. Enterprise resource planning and beyond:integrating your entire organization. The St. Louis Press APICS Series on Resource Management,:5
18. Laughlin, S., 1999. An ERP game plan. Journal of Business Strategy, 20 (1) Jan./Feb.:32
19. Lucas, H., and Baroudi, J., 1994. The role of information technology in organization design. Journal of Management Information Systems, Spring:9
20. McCutcheon, D., and Meredith, J., 1993. Conducting case study in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 11:239
21. Minahan, T., 1998. Enterprise resource planning:Strategies not included. Purchasing, 125 (1) July 16:112–127.
22. Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., and Nilakanta, S., 1994. Implementation of electronic data interchange:An innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11 (2) Fall:157
23. Quinn, J. B., and Baily, M. B., 1994. Information technology:Increasing productivity in services. The Academy of Management Executive, 8:28
24. Rajagopal, P. S., and Frank, T., A comparative case analysis of enterprise resource planning systems implementation and performance & SAP. Annual Conference of Decision Sciences Institute Meeting at Orlando. November. Florida
25. Rajagopal, P. S., and Frank, T., 2000b. Enhancing manufacturing performance through implementation of enterprise pesource planning systems. Information Systems Management, Summer:43
26. Rajagopal, P. S., 2001. An innovation diffusion view of implementation of enterprise resource planning systems and development of a research model. Accepted for publication by Information and Management. Saccomano, A., “More than manufacturing,” Traffic World, 256 (5):46
27. Morton, M. 1991. The Corporation of the 1990s, Scott:Oxford University Press.
28. Shtub, A., 1999. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP):The Dynamics of Operations Management, Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Skinner, W., 1969. Manufacturing:Missing link in corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 47 (3):136
30. Swamidass, P. M., and Newell, W. T., 1987. Manufacturing strategy, environment uncertainty, and performance:A path analytical model. Management Science, 33 (4):509
31. Stevens, T., 1997. Kodak focuses on ERP. Industry Week, 246 (15) August 18:130
32. Ward, P. T., Leong, G. K., and Boyer, K. K., 1994. Manufacturing proactiveness and performance. Decision Sciences, 25 (3):337
33. Yin, R. K., 1993. “ Applications of case study research ”. In Applied Social Research Methods, Vol. 34, New Bury Park, CA:Sage Publications.