A Research Note on the Dimensionality of Daly and Miller's Writing Apprehension Scale

Written Communication

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 61-79

  Bline, D ^a   Lowe, D R ^a   Meixner, W F ^b   Nouri, H ^c   Pearce, K ^a  

^a Bryant College   (United States)

^b TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c The College of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001195531     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088301018001003     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bennett, K., & Rhodes, S. C. (1988). Writing apprehension and writing intensity in business and industry. Journal of Business Communication, 25, 25-31.
2. Bickel, P.J., & Doksum, K. A. (1977). Mathematical statistics. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
3. Boozer, R. W., Lally, T. P., & Stacks, D. W. (1983). Written communication apprehension: What is it and how can it be measured? In S. Bruno (Ed.), ABCA proceedings: New directions in communication research (pp. 3-26). Houston, TX: American Business Communication Association.
4. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1983). Research note on the dimensions of communication reticence. Communication Quarterly, 31, 238-248.
5. Charney, D. A., Newman, J. H., & Palmquist, M. (1995). “I'm just no good at writing”: Epistemological style and attitudes toward writing. Written Communication, 12, 298-329.
6. Clarke, C. T. (1991). Rationale and development of a scale to measure computer-mediated communication apprehension (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52-04, A1129.
7. Daly, J. A. (1978). Writing apprehension and writing intensity in business and industry. Journal of Educational Research, 72, 10-14.
8. Daly, J. A., & Miller, M. D. (1975). The empirical development of an instrument to measure writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9, 242-248.
9. Everett, J. E., & Entrekin, L. V. (1980). Factor comparability and the advantages of multiple group factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15, 165-180.
10. Flaherty, L. M., Pearce, K. J., & Rubin, R. B. (1998). Internet and face-to-face communication: Not functional alternatives. Communication Quarterly, 46, 250-268.
11. Hartman, K., Neuwirth, C. M., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Cochran, C., Palmquist, M., & Zubrow, D. (1991). Patterns of social interaction and learning to write: Some effects of network technologies. Written Communication, 8, 79-113.
12. Mabrito, M. (1991). Electronic mail as a vehicle for peer response. Written Communication, 8, 509-532.
13. Mabrito, M. (1992). Computer-mediated communication and high-apprehensive writers: Rethinking the collaborative process. Bulletin, 16, 26-30.
14. Penley, L. E., Alexander, E. R., Jernigan, I. E., & Henwood, C. I. (1991). Communication abilities of managers: The relationship to performance. Journal of Management, 17, 57-76.
15. Reed, W. M. (1990). The effects of computer-based writing instruction and mode of discourse on writing performance and writer anxieties. Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 211-221.
16. Reinsch, N. L., Jr. (1985). Technology aversion (with implications for education and training). Office Systems Research Journal, 4, 9-20.
17. Riffe, D., & Stacks, D. W. (1988). Dimensions of writing communication apprehension among mass communication students. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 384-391.
18. Scott, C. R., & Rockwell, S. C. (1997). The effect of communication, writing, and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies. Communication Education, 46, 44-62.
19. Shaver, J. P. (1990). Reliability and validity of measures of attitudes toward writing and toward writing with the computer. Written Communication, 7, 375-392.
20. Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis. New York: John Wiley.
21. Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501.