Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results

Clinical Trials

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 582-591

  Long, Christopher R ^a   Stewart, M Kathryn ^b   Cunningham, Thomas V ^c   Warmack, T Scott ^a   McElfish, Pearl A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

disseminating results; dissemination; dissemination survey; participant preferences; participant registry; research results; ResearchMatch; results' communication; Results' dissemination; social media dissemination

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; E-MAIL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ONLINE SYSTEM; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELECONFERENCE; TEXT MESSAGING; VERY ELDERLY; ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH SUBJECT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNICATION; DISCLOSURE; ELECTRONIC MAIL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85001115537     PISSN: 17407745     EISSN: 17407753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1740774516665598     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Partridge AH, Winer EP., Informing clinical trial participants about study results. JAMA 2002; 288: 363-365.
2. Chen PG, Diaz N, Lucas G, et al. Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. Am J Prev Med 2010; 39: 372-378.
3. Fernandez CV, Kodish E, Shurin S, et al. Offering to return results to research participants: attitudes and needs of principal investigators in the Children's Oncology Group. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2003; 25: 704-708.
4. Partridge AH, Hackett N, Blood E, et al. Oncology physician and nurse practices and attitudes regarding offering clinical trial results to study participants. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 629-632.
5. Rigby H, Fernandez CV., Providing research results to study participants: support versus practice of researchers presenting at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting. Blood 2005; 106: 1199-1202.
6. Shalowitz DI, Miller FG., The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participants. J Med Ethics 2008; 34: e17.
7. Fernandez CV, Ruccione K, Wells RJ, et al. Recommendations for the return of research results to study participants and guardians: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 4573-4579.
8. Fernandez CV, Skedgel C, Weijer C., Considerations and costs of disclosing study findings to research participants. CMAJ 2004; 170: 1417-1419.
9. Markman M., Providing research participants with findings from completed cancer-related clinical trials: not quite as simple as it sounds. Cancer 2006; 106: 1421-1424.
10. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities-vision and mission, 2015, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ (. accessed 18 May 2015).
11. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Engagement., http://www.pcori.org/program/engagement (2015,. accessed 19 May 2015).
12. Carpenter D, Nieva V, Albaghal T, et al. Development of a planning tool to guide research dissemination. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, et al. (eds) Advances in patient safety: from research to implementation (Volume 4: programs, tools, and products). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2005, pp. 83-91.
13. Miller FA, Christensen R, Giacomini M, et al. Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants. J Med Ethics 2008; 34: 210-213.
14. Laurie G., Recognizing the right not to know: conceptual, professional, and legal implications. J Law Med Ethics 2014; 42: 53-63.
15. Snowdon C, Garcia J, Elbourne D., Reactions of participants to the results of a randomised controlled trial: exploratory study. BMJ 1998; 317: 21-26.
16. Lorimer K, Gray CM, Hunt K, et al. Response to written feedback of clinical data within a longitudinal study: a qualitative study exploring the ethical implications. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 10.
17. Chung W, Kim H, Nam CM., Breast-feeding in South Korea: factors influencing its initiation and duration. Public Health Nutr 2008; 11: 225-229.
18. Shalowitz DI, Miller FG., Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions. PLoS Med 2008; 5: e91.
19. Dixon-Woods M, Jackson C, Windridge KC, et al. Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: qualitative study of participants' views. BMJ 2006; 332: 206-210.
20. Fernandez CV, Gao J, Strahlendorf C, et al. Providing research results to participants: attitudes and needs of adolescents and parents of children with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 878-883.
21. Trinidad SB, Ludman EJ, Hopkins S, et al. Community dissemination and genetic research: moving beyond results reporting. Am J Med Genet A 2015; 167: 1542-1550.
22. Kadimpati S, McCormick JB, Chiu Y, et al. Utilizing focus groups with potential participants and their parents: an approach to inform study design in a large clinical trial. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2014; 5: 31-38.
23. Barnett NA, O'Brien JT., Patient involvement in research: an audit of study feedback to participants. Int Psychogeriatr 2013; 25: 1387-1388.
24. Partridge AH, Wong JS, Knudsen K, et al. Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative study. Lancet 2005; 365: 963-964.
25. Baylor A, Muzoora C, Bwana M, et al. Dissemination of research findings to research participants living with HIV in rural Uganda: challenges and rewards. PLoS Med 2013; 10: e1001397.
26. Harris PA, Scott KW, Lebo L, et al. ResearchMatch: a national registry to recruit volunteers for clinical research. Acad Med 2012; 87: 66-73.
27. ResearchMatch. ResearchMatch volunteer FAQ., https://www.researchmatch.org/volunteers/index-faq.php (2015,. accessed 12 August 2015).
28. ResearchMatch. About., https://www.researchmatch.org/about/ (2016,. accessed 13 April 2016).
29. ResearchMatch. RM Metrics as of 16 November 2015., https://www.researchmatch.org/index-pubsitemetrics.php (2015,. accessed 16 November 2015).
30. Fernandez CV, Santor D, Weijer C, et al. The return of research results to participants: pilot questionnaire of adolescents and parents of children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007; 48: 441-446.
31. Dorsey ER, Beck CA, Adams M, et al. Communicating clinical trial results to research participants. Arch Neurol 2008; 65: 1590-1595.
32. Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D, et al. Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. Am J Bioeth 2008; 8: 36-43.
33. Partridge AH, Burstein HJ, Gelman RS, et al. Do patients participating in clinical trials want to know study results? J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 491-492.
34. Gikonyo C, Kamuya D, Mbete B, et al. Feedback of research findings for vaccine trials: experiences from two malaria vaccine trials involving healthy children on the Kenyan Coast. Dev World Bioeth 2013; 13: 48-56.
35. Nease RF, Brooks WB., Patient desire for information and decision making in health-care decisions: the Autonomy Preference Index and the Health Opinion Survey. J Gen Intern Med 1995; 10: 593-600.
36. Manson NC., Why do patients want information if not to take part in decision making? J Med Ethics 2010; 36: 834-837.
37. Ross JS, Tse T, Zarin DA, et al. Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis. BMJ 2012; 344: d7292.
38. McCormack L, Sheridan S, Lewis M, et al. Communication and dissemination strategies to facilitate the use of health-related evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 213. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013.
39. Cox K, Moghaddam N, Bird L, et al. Feedback of trial results to participants: a survey of clinicians' and patients' attitudes and experiences. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2011; 15: 124-129.