Simultaneous inversion of airborne electromagnetic data for resistivity and magnetic permeability

GEOPHYSICS

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2021, Pages 1556-1564

  Beard, Les P ^a   Nyquist, Jonathan E ^b  

^a GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF NORWAY   (Norway)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data processing; Inverse analysis; Magnetic anomaly; Resistivity

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DATA ACQUISITION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY OF SOLIDS; MAGNETIC PERMEABILITY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PHASE MEASUREMENT; PHASE SHIFT;

AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS; LAYERED-EARTH INVERSION ALGORITHM; SIMULTANEOUS INVERSION;

ELECTROMAGNETIC PROSPECTING;

DATA PROCESSING; INVERSE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; RESISTIVITY;

EID: 85000257173     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444452     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Doll, W. E., Helm, J. M., and Beard, L. P., 1995, Airborne detection of magnetic anomalies associated with soils on the Oak Ridge Reservation, Tennessee: Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, Proceedings, 619-626.
2. Doll, W. E., Nyquist, J. E., and Beard, L. P., 1994, Airborne geophysical survey of the Oak Ridge Reservation, Tennessee: Lockheed Martin Energy Systems Report TM-123.
3. Fraser, D. C., 1981, Magnetite mapping with a multicoil airborne electromagnetic system: Geophysics, 46, 1579-1593.
4. Marquardt, D., 1963, An algorithm for least-squares estimation of non-linear parameters: J. Soc. Indust. and Appl. Math., 11, 431-441.
5. Menke, W., 1984, Geophysical data analysis: Discrete inverse theory: Academic Press Inc.
6. Nyquist, J. E., and Doll, W. E., 1996, Analysis and interpretation of airborne geophysical data acquired over the Melton Valley Waste Area Groupings and adjacent areas, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Lockheed Martin Energy Systems Report TM-208.
7. Parasnis, D. S., 1986, Principles of applied geophysics, 4th Ed.: Chapman and Hall.
8. Pellerin, L., Labson, V. F., and Anderson, W. L., 1993, Interpretation of a low-level helicopter EM survey flown over Idaho National Engineering Lab: Presented at the International Workshop on Airborne Electromagnetic Methods, Tucson, Arizona.
9. PRC, Inc., 1994, Unexploded ordnance advanced technology demonstration program at Jefferson Proving Ground (Phase I): U.S. Army Environmental Center, Report No. SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-94120.
10. Press, W., Flannery, B., Teukolsky, S., and Vettering, W., 1992, Numerical recipes in Fortran - The art of scientific computing, 2nd Ed.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
11. Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., and Sheriff, R. E., 1990, Applied geophysics, 2nd Ed.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
12. Thomas, L., 1975, Electromagnetic sounding with susceptibility among the model parameters: Geophysics, 42, 92-96.
13. Wait, J. R., 1982, Geo-electromagnetism: Academic Press Inc.
14. Walker, P., 1992, Inversion of HEM data for resistivity and susceptibility: Presented at the 54th Annual Meeting, Eur. Assn. Expl. Geophys., Abstracts, 710-711.
15. Ward, S. H., 1961, The electromagnetic response of a magnetic iron ore deposit: Geophys. Prosp., 9, 191-202.
16. Zhang, Z., and Oldenburg, D., 1997, Recovering magnetic susceptibility data from electromagnetic data over a one-dimensional earth: Geophys. J. Internat., 130, 422-434.