Can virtue be taught?

Educational Forum

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 124-129

  Sockett, Hugh ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85000240967     PISSN: 00131725     EISSN: 19388098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00131729609335113     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bennett, W. J. 1992. The de-valuing of America: The fight for our culture and our children. New York: Summit Books.
2. Cohen, P. 1995. The content of their character: Educators find new ways to tackle values and morality. Curriculum Update (Spring): 1-8.
3. Elkind, D. 1994. Ties that stress: The newfamily imbalance. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
4. Empson, W. 1930. Seven types of ambiguity. London, England: Chatto and Windus.
5. Hirst, P. 1974. Knowledge and the curriculum: A collection of philosophical papers. London, England: Routledge & K. Paul.
6. Hoggart, R. 1995. The way we live now. London, England: Chatto and Windus.
7. Kozol, J. 1995. Amazing grace: The lives of children and the conscience of a nation. New York: Crown.
8. Lickona, T. 1991. Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam Books.
9. Plato. (T. G. West, trans.) 1979. Plato's "Apology of Socrates": An interpretation, with a new translation. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
10. Ryle, G. 1973. Can virtue be taught? In Education and the development of reason, ed. R. F. Dearden, P. H. Hirst, and R. S. Peters, 434-47. London, England: Routledge & K. Paul.
11. Sockett, H. 1993. The moral base for teacher professionalism. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Stacey, J. 1993. Good riddance to "the family": A response to David Popenoe. Journal of Marriage and the Family 55(3): 545-47.