A new texture and shape based technique for improving meningioma classification

Microscopy Research and Technique

Volumn 77, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 862-873

  Fatima, Kiran ^a   Arooj, Arshia ^a   Majeed, Hammad ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF COMPUTER AND EMERGING SCIENCES   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

classification; computer aided diagnosis (CAD); grey level co occurrence matrix (GLCM); hybrid classifier; meningioma; multi layer perceptron (MLP); textural feature extraction

Indexed keywords

EXTRACTION; HISTOLOGY; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MEDICAL COMPUTING; TUMORS;

COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSE; FEATURES EXTRACTION; GRAY-LEVEL CO-OCCURRENCE MATRIX; GREY-LEVEL CO-OCCURRENCE MATRIXES; HYBRID CLASSIFIER; MENINGIOMAS; MULTI-LAYER PERCEPTRON; MULTILAYERS PERCEPTRONS; TEXTURAL FEATURE; TEXTURAL FEATURE EXTRACTION;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 84999917226     PISSN: 1059910X     EISSN: 10970029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22409     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Al-Kadi O. 2010. Texture measures combination for improved meningioma classification of histopathological images. Pattern Recognit 43:2043–2053.
2. Al-Kadi OS. 2009. A fractal dimension based optimal wavelet packet analysis technique for classification of meningioma brain tumours. In: 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE. Cairo. pp. 4177–4180.
3. Basavanhally AN, Ganesan S, Agner S, Monaco JP, Feldman MD, Tomaszewski JE, Bhanot G, Madabhushi A. 2010 Computerized image-based detection and grading of lymphocytic infiltration in her2+ breast cancer histopathology. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57:642–653.
4. Bloom F, Beal F, Kupfer D. 2003. The Dana guide to brain health, Simon and Schuster, Inc. Dana Foundation. New York. 2003. 733 p.
5. Blum H. 1973. Biological shape and visual science (part i). J Theor Biol 38:205–287.
6. Cyr CM, Kimia BB. 2004. A similarity-based aspect-graph approach to 3d object recognition. Int J Comput Vis 57:5–22.
7. Dundar MM, Badve S, Bilgin G, Raykar V, Jain R, Sertel O, Gurcan MN. 2011. Computerized classification of intraductal breast lesions using histopathological images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58:1977–1984.
8. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL, Committee IG. (2005). The 2005 international society of urological pathology (isup) consensus conference on gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242.
9. Gilles FH, Tavaré CJ, Becker LE, Burger PC, Yates AJ, Pollack IF, Finlay JL. 2007. Pathologist interobserver variability of histologic features in childhood brain tumors: Results from the ccg-945 study. Pediatr Dev Pathol 11:108–117.
10. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. 2002. Digital image processing, 2nd ed. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry.
11. Grootscholten C, Bajema IM, Florquin S, Steenbergen EJ, Peutz-Kootstra CJ, Goldschmeding R, Bijl M, Hagen EC, Van Houwelingen HC, Derksen RH, et al. 2008. Interobserver agreement of scoring of histopathological characteristics and classification of lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant 23:223–230.
12. Hall MA. 1999. Correlation-based feature selection for machine learning. PhD Thesis. The University of Waikato. Hamilton, New Zealand.
13. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Vol. 6. pp 610–621.
14. Hingway S, Bhurchandi M. 2011. An improved shock graph for an improved object recognition. Cyber Journals: Multidisciplinary Journals in Science and Technology, Journal of Selected Areas in Software Engineering (JSSE), May Edition, 2011.
15. Huang P-W, Lai Y-H. 2010. Effective segmentation and classification for hcc biopsy images. Pattern Recognit 43:1550–1563.
16. Jan J. 2010. Medical image processing, reconstruction and restoration: Concepts and methods. USA: CRC Taylor and Francis Press.
17. Kwak JT, Hewitt SM, Sinha S, Bhargava R. 2011. Multimodal microscopy for automated histologic analysis of prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 11:62.
18. Lessmann B, Hans V, Degenhard A, Nattkemper TW. 2006. Feature-space exploration of pathology images using content-based database visualization. In: Medical imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics. San Diego, California. pp. 61445Z.
19. Lessmann B, Nattkemper T, Hans V, Degenhard A, et al. 2007. A method for linking computed image features to histological semantics in neuropathology. J Biomed Inform 40:631–641.
20. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Macrini D, Shokoufandeh A, Dickinson S, Siddiqi K, Zucker S. 2002. View-based 3-d object recognition using shock graphs. In: 16th IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. 3. pp. 24–28.
21. Madabhushi A. 2009. Digital pathology image analysis: opportunities and challenges. Imaging Med 1:7–10.
22. Maillo A, Orfao A, Espinosa AB, Sayagués JM, Merino M, Sousa P, Lara M, Tabernero MD. 2007. Early recurrences in histologically benign/grade i meningiomas are associated with large tumors and coexistence of monosomy 14 and del (1p36) in the ancestral tumor cell clone. Neurooncology 9:438–446.
23. Mallat SG. 1989. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intelligence 11:674–693.
24. Markert EK, Mizuno H, Vazquez A, Levine AJ. 2011. Molecular classification of prostate cancer using curated expression signatures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:21276–21281.
25. Oberthuer A, Berthold F, Warnat P, Hero B, Kahlert Y, Spitz R, Ernestus K, König R, Haas S, Eils R, et al. 2006. Customized oligonucleotide microarray gene expression–based classification of neuroblastoma patients outperforms current clinical risk stratification. J Clin Oncol 24:5070–5078.
26. Qureshi H, Rajpoot N, Masood K, Hans V. 2006. Classification of meningiomas using discriminant wavelet packets and learning vector quantization. In: Proceedings of medical image understanding and analysis (MIUA).
27. Qureshi H, Rajpoot N, Nattkemper T, Hans V. 2009. A robust adaptive wavelet-based method for classification of meningioma histology images. In: Proceedings MICCAI'2009 workshop on optical tissue image analysis in microscopy, histology, and endoscopy (OPTIMHisE).
28. Qureshi H, Rajpoot N, Wilson R, Nattkemper T, Hans V. 2007. Comparative analysis of discriminant wavelet packet features and raw image features for classification of meningioma subtypes. In: Proceedings of Medical Image Understanding and Analysis.
29. Qureshi H, Rajpoot NM. 2010. Comparative analysis of spatial and transform domain methods for meningioma subtype classification. In: Proceedings of Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, pp. 209–213.
30. Qureshi H, Sertel O, Rajpoot N, Wilson R, Gurcan M. (2008a). Adaptive discriminant wavelet packet transform and local binary patterns for meningioma subtype classification. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2008. pp 196–204.
31. Qureshi H, Wilson R, Rajpoot N. 2008b. Optimal wavelet basis for wavelet packets based meningioma subtype classification. In: Proceedings of the 12th Medical Image Understanding and Analysis (MIUA'2008).
32. Reis-Filho JS, Pusztai L. 2011. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: Classification, prognostication, and prediction. Lancet 378:1812–1823.
33. Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P. 2007. The 2007 who classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114:97–109.
34. Sebastian T, Klein P, Kimia B. 2001. Recognition of shapes by editing shock graphs. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 1. IEEE Computer Society. pp. 755–755.
35. Sertel O, Kong J, Shimada H, Catalyurek U, Saltz JH, Gurcan MN. 2009. Computer-aided prognosis of neuroblastoma on whole-slide images: Classification of stromal development. Pattern Recognit 42:1093–1103.
36. Sertel O, Lozanski G, Shana'ah A, Gurcan MN. 2010. Computer-aided detection of centroblasts for follicular lymphoma grading using adaptive likelihood-based cell segmentation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57:2613–2616.
37. Shapematcher 5: A shape indexer and matcher for object recognition. http://www.cs.toronto.edu/dmac/ShapeMatcher/. Last accessed April, 11 2014.
38. Shuttleworth J, Todman A, Norrish M, Bennett M. 2005. Learning histopathological microscopy. In: Pattern recognition and image analysis. Vol. 3687, pp. 764–772. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
39. Siddiqi K, Kimia BB. 1996. A shock grammar for recognition. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (Proceedings CVPR'96). pp. 507–513.
40. Siddiqi K, Shokoufandeh A, Dickinson SJ, Zucker SW. 1999. Shock graphs and shape matching. Int J Comput Vis 35:13–32.
41. Strange H, Zwiggelaar R. 2013. Meningioma subtype classification using morphology features and random forests. In: Proceedings of SPIE 8676, Medical Imaging 2013: Digital Pathology, 86760S, Florida, USA.
42. Sundar H, Silver D, Gagvani N, Dickinson S. 2003. Skeleton based shape matching and retrieval. In: IEEE shape modeling international. pp. 130–139.
43. Tou JT, Gonzalez RC. 1974. Pattern recognition principles. United States. 395 p.
44. Wirjadi O, Breuel T, Feiden W, Kim Y. 2006. Automated feature selection for the classification of meningioma cell nuclei. In: Bildverarbeitung fr die Medizin 2006, ser. Informatik aktuell, H. Handels, J. Ehrhardt, A. Horsch, H.-P. Meinzer, and T. Tolxdorff, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 76–80.
45. Zeng Z, Tong Z, Han Z, Zhang Y, Zwiggelaar R. 2014. The classification of meningioma subtypes based on the color segmentation and shape features. In: Frontier and future development of information technology in medicine and education. Springer Netherlands. pp. 2669–2674.