Is the Tunnel Technique More Effective Than Open Augmentation With a Titanium-Reinforced Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation?

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 74, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 1752-1756

  Deeb, George R ^a   Wilson, Graham H ^a   Carrico, Caroline K ^b   Zafar, Usman ^a   Laskin, Daniel M ^a   Deeb, Janina Golob ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE ALLOGRAFT; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HORIZONTAL RIDGE AUGMENTATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POLITEF IMPLANT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TITANIUM REINFORCED POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE MEMBRANE; TOOTH IMPLANT; TREATMENT PLANNING; TUNNEL TECHNIQUE; WOUND DEHISCENCE; ADOLESCENT; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; FEMALE; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; POLITEF; TITANIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE; TITANIUM;

EID: 84999816217     PISSN: 02782391     EISSN: 15315053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.04.031     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. 1 Schropp, L., Wenzel, A., Kostopoulos, L., Karring, T., Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 23, 2003, 313.
2. 2 Dahlin, C., Gottlow, J., Linde, A., Nyman, S., Healing of maxillary and mandibular bone defects using a membrane technique. An experimental study in monkeys. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 24, 1990, 13.
3. 3 Buser, D., Dula, K., Belser, U., et al. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. 1. Surgical procedure in the maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 13, 1993, 29.
4. 4 Buser, D., Dula, K., Belser, U.C., et al. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. II. Surgical procedure in the mandible. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 15, 1995, 10.
5. 5 McAllister, B.S., Haghighat, K., Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol, 78, 2007, 377.
6. 6 Simion, M., Baldoni, M., Rossi, P., et al. A comparative study of the effectiveness of e-PTFE membranes with and without early exposure during the healing period. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 14, 1994, 166.
7. 7 Machtei, E.E., The effect of membrane exposure on the outcome of regenerative procedures in humans: A meta-analysis. J Periodontol, 72, 2001, 512.
8. 8 Block, M.S., Kelley, B., Horizontal posterior ridge augmentation: The use of a collagen membrane over a bovine particulate graft: Technique note. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 71, 2013, 1513.
9. 9 Block, M.S., Color Atlas of Dental Implant Surgery. ed 3, 2011, Saunders Elsevier, Maryland Heights, MO.