A comparative study of benchmarking approaches for non-domestic buildings: Part 2 – Bottom-up approach

International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 247-261

  Burman, Esfandiar ^a   Hong, Sung Min ^b   Paterson, Greig ^b   Kimpian, Judit ^c   Mumovic, Dejan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c Director of Sustainable Architecture and Research   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CIBSE TM22; EBPD; Energy benchmarks; Non domestic buildings; Schools

Indexed keywords

EID: 84999788916     PISSN: 22126090     EISSN: 22126104     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ahmad, M., Charles, H., Uncalibrated building energy simulation modelling results. HVAC&R Res. 12:4 (2006), 1141–1155.
2. ASHRAE, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1. 2007, ASHRAE, Atlanta.
3. Burman, E., Mumovic, D., Kimpian, J., 2013. A methodology for measurement and verification of energy performance under the framework of the European directive for energy performance of buildings, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Sustainable Energy & Environmental Protection. Maribor, Maribor University, Slovenia.
4. Burman, E., Mumovic, D., Kimpian, J., Towards measurement and verification of energy performance under the framework of the European directive for energy performance of buildings. Energy 77 (2014), 153–163.
5. Carbon Trust, Closing the Gap – Lessons Learned on Realising The Potential of Low Carbon Building Design. 2011, Carbon Trust, London.
6. CarbonBuzz, 2014. CarbonBuzz. [Online] Available at: < www.carbonbuzz.org> (accessed 11.10.14).
7. Carriere, M., Schoenau, G.J., Besant, R.W., Investigation of some large building energy conservation opportunities using the DOE-2 model. Energ. Convers. Manage. 40 (1999), 861–872.
8. Carvalho, M., EU energy and climate change strategy. Energy 40 (2012), 19–22.
9. CIBSE, Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, CIBSE Guide B. 2005, The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London.
10. CIBSE, Energy Assessment and Reporting Method, CIBSE TM22. 2006, The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London.
11. CIBSE, Energy Benchmarks, CIBSE TM46. 2008, The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London.
12. CIBSE, Energy Efficiency in Buildings, CIBSE Guide F. 2012, The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London.
13. CIBSE, Evaluating Operational Energy Use at Design Stage, CIBSE TM54. 2013, The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London.
14. CLG, A Technical Manual for SBEM. 2011, BRE, London.
15. Cohen, R., Standeven, M., Bordass, B., Leaman, A., Assessing building performance in use 1: the Probe process. Build. Res. Inf. 29:2 (2001), 85–102.
16. Demanuele, C., Tweddell, T., Davies, M., Bridging the Gap Between Predicted and Actual Energy Performance in Schools. 2010, World Renewable Energy Congress XI, Abu Dhabi.
17. DfES, Building Bulletin 101 Ventilation of School Buildings. 2006, Department for Education and Skills, London.
18. DOE, International Performance Measurement & Verification Protocol (IPMVP), Volume I: Concepts and Options for Determining Energy and Water savings. 2002, U.S. Department of Energy, SL.
19. EFA, Priority School Building Programme Baseline Designs for Energy Efficiency. 2012, The Education Funding Agency, London.
20. EU, Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings. 2003, Official Journal of the European Communities.
21. European Commission, Energy Efficiency: Delivering the 20% Target. 2008, European Commission, Brussels.
22. Federspiel, C., Zhang, Q., Arens, E., Model-based benchmarking with application to laboratory buildings. Energy Build. 34 (2002), 203–214.
23. Field, J., Jones, P., Working Towards a Common Basis for Discussing Energy Use in Buildings, CADDET Energy Efficiency Newsletter 3/1994. 1994, International Energy Agency/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
24. Field, J., et al. Energy performance of occupied non-domestic buildings: Assessment by analysing end-use energy consumptions. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 18:1 (1997), 39–46.
25. Haberl, J.S., Bou-Saada, T.E., Procedures for calibrating hourly simulation models to the measured building energy and environmental data. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 120:8 (1998), 193–204.
26. Heo, Y., Choudhary, R., Augenbroe, G.A., Calibration of building energy models for retrofit analysis under uncertainty. Energy Build. 47 (2012), 550–560.
27. HM Government, Conservation of Fuel and Power in New Buildings Other Than Dwellings. 2013, NBS, London.
28. Hong, S.-M., Paterson, G., Burman, E., Steadman, P., Mumovic, D., A comparative study of benchmarking approaches for non-domestic buildings: Part 1 – Top-down approach. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 2 (2014), 119–130.
29. IEE, Implementation of the Energy Performance of Buildings, Country Reports 2008, Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, European Commission. 2008, Intelligent Energy Europe, Brussels.
30. Landmark, 2014. Landmark. [Online] Available at: < www.ndepcregister.com> (accessed 12.10.14).
31. Lomas, K.J., Eppel, H., Sensitivity analysis techniques for building thermal simulation programs. Energy Build. 19 (1992), 21–44.
32. Macdonald, I.A., Clarke, J.A., Strachan, P.A., 1999. Assessing uncertainty in building simulation. Proceedings of International Building Performance Simulation Association.
33. Menezes, A.C., Cripps, A., Bouchlaghem, D., Buswell, R., Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap. Appl. Energy 58 (2013), 157–167.
34. NBI, Energy Performance of LEED for New Construction Buildings. 2008, New Building Institute (NBI), Vancouver.
35. Norford, L.K., Socolow, R.H., Hsieh, E.S., Spadaro, G.V., Two-to-one discrepancy between measured and predicted performance of a ‘low-energy’ office building: insights from a reconciliation based on the DOE-2 model. Energy Build. 21 (1994), 121–131.
36. Perez-Lombard, L., Ortiz, J., Gonzalez, R., Maestre, I., A review of benchmarking, rating, and labelling concepts within the framework of building energy certification schemes. Energy Build. 41 (2009), 272–278.
37. Raftery, P., Keane, M., Costa, A., Calibrating whole building energy models: Detailed case study using hourly measured data. Energy Build. 43 (2011), 3666–3679.
38. Raslan, R., Davies, M., Results variability in accredited building energy performance compliance demonstration software in the UK: an inter-model comparative study. J. Build. Perform. Simulation 3:1 (2009), 63–85.
39. TSB, 2014. TSB. [Online] Available at: < http://www.innovateuk.org> (accessed 11.10.14).
40. USGBC, LEED Reference Guide for Building Design and Construction. LEED v4. 2013, USGBC, Washington, DC.