Total Chain Integration of sustainable biorefinery systems

Applied Energy

Volumn 184, Issue , 2016, Pages 1432-1446

  Budzianowski, Wojciech M ^a,b   Postawa, Karol ^b  

^a Poland Consulting Services   (Poland)

^b Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development (RESD) Group   (Poland)

Author keywords

Biorefinery system; Economic viability; Software tool; Sustainability; Total Chain Integration

Indexed keywords

BIOCONVERSION; BIOMASS; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LIFE CYCLE; REFINING; SUPPLY CHAINS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BIOMASS SUPPLY CHAIN; BIOREFINERIES; BUSINESS PRACTICES; COMMERCIAL FACILITIES; ECONOMIC VIABILITY; ECONOMICALLY VIABLE; FINITE FOSSIL RESOURCES; INTEGRATION APPROACH;

INTEGRATION;

BIOFUEL; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EXPENDITURE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FOSSIL FUEL; KNOWLEDGE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 84999009634     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.050     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. [1] IEA (International Energy Agency), IEA bioenergy task 42 biorefining. 2014, IEA, Paris.
2. [2] Uihlein, A., Schebek, L., Environmental impacts of a lignocellulose feedstock biorefinery system: an assessment. Biomass Bioenergy 33:5 (2009), 793–802.
3. [3] Ragauskas, A.J., Williams, C.K., Davison, B.H., Britovsek, G., Cairney, J., Eckert, C.A., et al. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311:5760 (2006), 484–489.
4. [4] Bozell, J.J., Petersen, G.R., Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates – The US department of energy's “top 10” revisited. Green Chem 12:4 (2010), 539–554.
5. [5] Dale, B., A new industry has been launched: the cellulosic biofuels ship (finally) sails. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 9 (2015), 1–3.
6. [6] Cherubini, F., The biorefinery concept: using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy Convers Manage 51:7 (2010), 1412–1421.
7. [7] Budzianowski, W.M., Postawa, K., Renewable energy from biogas with reduced carbon dioxide footprint: implications of applying different plant configurations and operating pressures. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2017, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.076.
8. [8] Silalertruksa, T., Gheewala, S.H., Pongpat, P., Sustainability assessment of sugarcane biorefinery and molasses ethanol production in Thailand using eco-efficiency indicator. Appl Energy 160 (2015), 603–609.
9. [9] EC (European Commission). The EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED). Article 17(2).
10. [10] EC (European Commission). Commission staff working document. State of play on the sustainability of solid and gaseous biomass used for electricity, heating and cooling in the EU; 2014.
11. [11] Cherubini, F., Ulgiati, S., Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems – a LCA case study. Appl Energy 87:1 (2010), 47–57.
12. [12] Barros, J.J.C., Coira, M.L., López, M.P.C., Gochi, A.C., Assessing the global sustainability of different electricity generation systems. Energy 89 (2015), 473–489.
13. [13] Moncada, J., Cardona, C.A., Rincón, L.E., Design and analysis of a second and third generation biorefinery: the case of castorbean and microalgae. Bioresour Technol 198 (2015), 836–843.
14. [14] Gnansounou, E., Vaskan, P., Pachón, E.R., Comparative techno-economic assessment and LCA of selected integrated sugarcane-based biorefineries. Bioresour Technol 196 (2015), 364–375.
15. [15] Liska, A.J., Yang, H.S., Bremer, V.R., Klopfenstein, T.J., Walters, D.T., Erickson, G.E., et al. Improvements in life cycle energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of corn-ethanol. J Ind Ecol 13:1 (2009), 58–74.
16. [16] Kostevšek, A., Petek, J., Čuček, L., Klemeš, J.J., Varbanov, P.S., Locally integrated energy sectors supported by renewable network management within municipalities. Appl Therm Eng 89 (2015), 1014–1022.
17. [17] Narodoslawsky, M., Chemical engineering in a sustainable economy. Chem Eng Res Des 91 (2013), 2012–2018.
18. [18] Čuček, L., Varbanov, P.S., Klemeš, J.J., Kravanja, Z., Multi-objective regional Total Site Integration. Chem Eng Trans 35 (2013), 97–102.
19. [19] Čuček, L., Martín, M., Grossman, I.E., Kravanja, Z., Multi-period synthesis of optimally integrated biomass and bioenergy supply network. Comput Chem Eng 66 (2014), 57–70.
20. [20] Kim, S., Dale, B.E., Comparing alternative cellulosic biomass biorefining systems: centralized versus distributed processing systems. Biomass Bioenergy 74 (2013), 135–147.
21. [21] EC (European Commission), The circular economy. Connecting, creating and conserving value. 2014, EC, Brussels.
22. [22] Danish Energy Agency, Energy policy toolkit on energy efficiency in industries. 2015, Experiences from Denmark.
23. [23] Abdelaziz, O.Y., Gadalla, M.A., El-Halwagi, M.M., Ashour, F.H., A hierarchical approach for the design improvements of an Organocat biorefinery. Bioresour Technol 181 (2015), 321–329.
24. [24] Smith, R., Jobson, M., Chen, L., Recent development in the retrofit of heat exchanger networks. Chem Eng Trans 18 (2009), 27–32.
25. [25] Oliveira, C.M., Cruz, A.J.G., Costa, C.B.B., Improving second generation bioethanol production in sugarcane biorefineries through energy integration. Appl Therm Eng, 2017, 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.11.016.
26. [26] Dhole, V.R., Linnhoff, B., Total site targets for fuel, co-generation, emissions, and cooling. Comput Chem Eng 17 (1993), 101–109.
27. [27] Hackl, R., Harvey, S., Framework methodology for increased energy efficiency and renewable feedstock integration in industrial clusters. Appl Energy 112 (2013), 1500–1509.
28. [28] Martinez-Hernandez, E., Sadhukhan, J., Campbell, G.M., Integration of bioethanol as an in-process material in biorefineries using mass pinch analysis. Appl Energy 104 (2013), 517–526.
29. [29] El-Halwagi, A.M., Rosas, C., Ponce-Ortega, J.M., Jiménez-Gutiérrez, A., Mannan, M.S., El-Halwagi, M.M., Multiobjective optimization of biorefineries with economic and safety objectives. AIChE J 59:7 (2013), 2427–2434.
30. [30] Hoffmann, J., Rudra, S., Toor, S.S., Holm-Nielsen, J.B., Rosendahl, L.A., Conceptual design of an integrated hydrothermal liquefaction and biogas plant for sustainable bioenergy production. Bioresour Technol 129 (2013), 402–410.
31. [31] Marvin, W.A., Schmidt, L.D., Benjaafar, S., Tiffany, D.G., Daoutidis, P., Economic optimization of a lignocellulosic biomass-to-ethanol supply chain. Chem Eng Sci 67:1 (2012), 68–79.
32. [32] Joelsson, E., Wallberg, O., Börjesson, P., Integration potential, resource efficiency and cost of forest-fuel-based biorefineries. Comput Chem Eng 2 (2015), 240–258.
33. [33] Moshkelani, M., Marinova, M., Perrier, M., Paris, J., The forest biorefinery and its implementation in the pulp and paper industry: energy overview. Appl Therm Eng 50:2 (2013), 1427–1436.
34. [34] United Nation Environment Programme (UNEP), Guidelines for social Life Cycle Assessment of products, 2009.
35. [35] Kilkis, S., Kona, A., Maschio, I., Multicriteria evaluation of COM signatory cities in the EUropean Green Capital Award based on the Sdewes Index. Proceedings of the 10th conference on sustainable development of energy, water, and environment systems. SDEWES2015.0619, vol. 1–12, 2015.
36. [36] Yue, D., You, F., Snyder, S.W., Biomass-to-bioenergy and biofuel supply chain optimization: overview, key issues and challenges. Comput Chem Eng 66 (2014), 36–56.
37. [37] Gong, J., You, F., Optimal design and synthesis of algal biorefinery processes for biological carbon sequestration and utilization with zero direct greenhouse gas emissions: MINLP model and global optimization algorithm. Ind Eng Chem Res 53 (2014), 1563–1579.
38. [38] You, F., Tao, L., Graziano, D.J., Snyder, S.W., Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input-output analysis. AIChE J 58:4 (2012), 1157–1180.
39. [39] Cambero, C., Sowlati, T., Pavel, M., Economic and life cycle environmental optimization of forest-based biorefinery supply chains for bioenergy and biofuel production. Chem Eng Res Des 107 (2016), 218–235.
40. [40] Keller, H., Rettenmaier, N., Reinhardt, G.A., Integrated life cycle sustainability assessment – a practical approach applied to biorefineries. Appl Energy 154 (2015), 1072–1081.
41. [41] Naik, S.N., Goud, V.V., Rout, P.K., Dalai, A.K., Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive overview. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 14 (2010), 578–597.
42. [42] Jonker, J.G.G., van der Hilst, F., Junginger, H.M., Cavalett, O., Chagas, M.F., Faaij, A.P.C., Outlook for ethanol production costs in Brazil up to 2030, for different biomass crops and industrial technologies. Appl Energy 147 (2015), 593–610.
43. [43] Cavinato, C., Fatone, F., Bolzonella, D., Pavan, P., Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure with agro-wastes and energy crops: comparison of pilot and full scale experiences. Bioresour Technol 101 (2010), 545–550.
44. [44] Srirangan, K., Akawi, L., Moo-Young, M., Chou, C.P., Towards sustainable production of clean energy carriers from biomass resources. Appl Energy 100 (2012), 172–186.
45. [45] Gonela, V., Zhang, J., Osmani, A., Stochastic optimization of sustainable industrial symbiosis based hybrid generation bioethanol supply chains. Comput Ind Eng 87 (2015), 40–65.
46. [46] Narodoslawsky, M., Niederl-Schmidinger, A., Halasz, L., Utilising renewable resources economically: new challenges and chances for process development. J Clean Prod 16 (2008), 164–170.
47. [47] Ng, K.S., Sadhukhan, J., Techno-economic performance analysis of bio-oil based Fischer–Tropsch and CHP synthesis platform. Biomass Bioenergy 35:7 (2011), 3218–3234.
48. [48] Bond, J.Q., Upadhye, A.A., Olcay, H., Tompsett, G.A., Jae, J., Xing, R., et al. Production of renewable jet fuel range alkanes and commodity chemicals from integrated catalytic processing of biomass. Energy Environ Sci 7:4 (2014), 1500–1523.
49. [49] Fava, F., Totaro, G., Diels, L., Reis, M., Duarte, J., Carioca, O.B., et al. Biowaste biorefinery in Europe: opportunities and research & development needs. New Biotechnol 32:1 (2015), 100–108.
50. [50] Raven, R.P.J.M., Mourik, R.M., Feenstra, C.F.J., Heiskanen, E., Modulating societal acceptance in new energy projects: towards a toolkit methodology for project managers. Energy 34:5 (2009), 564–574.
51. [51] Ribeiro, F., Ferreira, P., Araújo, M., Braga, A.C., Public opinion on renewable energy technologies in Portugal. Energy 69 (2014), 39–50.
52. [52] Budzianowski, W.M., Benefits of biogas upgrading to biomethane by high-pressure reactive solvent scrubbing. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 6:1 (2012), 12–20.
53. [53] Fernando, S., Adhikari, S., Chandrapal, C., Murali, N., Biorefineries: current status challenges and future direction. Energy Fuels, 2006, 1727–1737.
54. [54] Laser, M., Jin, H., Jayawardhana, K., Dale, B.E., Lynd, L.R., Projected mature technology scenarios for conversion of cellulosic biomass to ethanol with coproduction thermochemical fuels, power, and/or animal feed protein. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 3 (2009), 231–246.
55. [55] Silva, L.F., Taciro, M.K., Raicher, G., Piccoli, R.A.M., Mendonça, T.T., Lopes, M.S.G., et al. Perspectives on the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates in biorefineries associated with the production of sugar and ethanol. Int J Biol Macromol 71 (2014), 2–7.
56. [56] Moncada, J., Tamayo, J.A., Cardona, C.A., Evolution from biofuels to integrated biorefineries: techno-economic and environmental assessment of oil palm in Colombia. J Clean Prod 81 (2014), 51–59.
57. [57] Hämäläinen, E., Hilmola, O.-P., Hetemäki, L., Fluctuating demand and its impacts to a paper producer: customer analysis. Expert Syst Appl 42:13 (2015), 5779–5788.
58. [58] FAOSTAT, Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, statistics division. http://faostat3.fao.org.download/F/FO/E, 2016 [accessed June 2016].
59. [59] Rafione, T., Marinova, M., Montastruc, L., Paris, J., The Green Integrated Forest Biorefinery: an innovative concept for the pulp and paper mills. Appl Therm Eng 73 (2014), 74–81.
60. 2 emissions and energy use. Energy 36 (2011), 932–941.
61. [61] Ellersdorfer, M., Weiβ, C., Integration of biogas plants in the building materials industry. Renew Energy 61 (2014), 125–131.
62. [62] Islam, M.K., Mondelli, D., Al Chami, Z., Mimiola, G., Dumontet, S., Comparison of maturity indices for composting different organic waste. J Residuals Sci Technol 9:2 (2012), 55–64.
63. [63] Djuric Ilic, D., Dotzauer, E., Trygg, L., Broman, G., Integration of biofuel production into district heating – part I: an evaluation of biofuel production costs using four types of biofuel production plants as case studies. J Clean Prod 69 (2014), 176–187.
64. [64] WEF (World Economic Forum), Towards the circular economy: accelerating the scale-up across global supply chain. 2014, WEF, Geneva.
65. [65] Arvidsson, M., Morandin, M., Harvey, S., Biomass gasification-based syngas production for a conventional oxo synthesis plant – process modeling, integration opportunities, and thermodynamic performance. Energy Fuels 28:6 (2014), 4075–4087.
66. [66] Poggi-Varaldo, H.M., Muñoz-Páez, K.M., Escamilla-Alvarado, C., Robledo-Narváez, P.N., Ponce-Noyola, M.T., Calva-Calva, G., et al. Biohydrogen, biomethane and bioelectricity as crucial components of biorefinery of organic wastes: a review. Waste Manage Res 32:5 (2014), 353–365.
67. [67] Zhu, L.D., Hiltunen, E., Application of livestock waste compost to cultivate microalgae for bioproducts production: a feasible framework. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54 (2016), 1285–1290.
68. [68] Liu, Z., Ruan, Z., Xiao, Y., Yi, Y., Tang, Y.J., Liao, W., et al. Integration of sewage sludge digestion with advanced biofuel synthesis. Bioresour Technol 132 (2013), 166–170.
69. [69] Albarelli, J.Q., Mian, A., Santos, D.T., Ensinas, A.V., Maréchal, F., Angela, M., et al. Valorization of sugarcane biorefinery residues using supercritical water gasification: a case study and perspectives. J Supercrit Fluid 96 (2015), 133–143.
70. [70] Eerhart, A.J.J.E., Huijgen, W.J.J., Grisel, R.J.H., van der Waal, J.C., de Jong, E., de Sousa, D.A., et al. Fuels and plastics from lignocellulosic biomass via the furan pathway; a technical analysis. RSC Adv 4:7 (2014), 3536–3549.
71. [71] Grisel, R.J.H., van der Waal, J.C., de Jong, E., Huijgen, W.J.J., Acid catalysed alcoholysis of wheat straw: towards second generation furan-derivatives. Catal Today 223 (2014), 3–10.
72. [72] Luo, L., van der Voet, E., Huppes, G., Biorefining of lignocellulosic feedstock – technical, economic and environmental considerations. Bioresour Technol 101:13 (2010), 5023–5032.
73. [73] van Heerden, C.D., Nicol, W., Continuous and batch cultures of Escherichia coli KJ134 for succinic acid fermentation: metabolic flux distributions and production characteristics. Microb Cell Fact, 12(1), 2013, 80.
74. [74] Günther, A., Jakob, T., Goss, R., König, S., Spindler, D., Räbiger, N., et al. Methane production from glycolate excreting algae as a new concept in the production of biofuels. Bioresour Technol 121 (2012), 454–457.
75. [75] Fresewinkel, M., Rosello, R., Wilhelm, C., Kruse, O., Hankamer, B., Posten, C., Integration in microalgal bioprocess development: design of efficient, sustainable, and economic processes. Eng Life Sci 14 (2014), 560–573.
76. [76] Geraili, A., Sharma, P., Romagnoli, J.A., Technology analysis of integrated biorefineries through process simulation and hybrid optimization. Energy 73 (2014), 145–159.
77. [77] Dias, M.O.S., Pereira, L.G., Junqueira, T.L., Pavanello, L.G., Chagas, M.F., Cavalett, O., et al. Butanol production in a sugarcane biorefinery using ethanol as feedstock. Part I: integration to a first generation sugarcane distillery. Chem Eng Res Des 92 (2014), 1441–1451.
78. [78] Pereira, L.G., Dias, M.O.S., Mariano, A.P., Maciel Filho, R., Bonomi, A., Economic and environmental assessment of n-butanol production in an integrated first and second generation sugarcane biorefinery: fermentative versus catalytic routes. Appl Energy 160 (2015), 120–131.
79. [79] Clausen, L.R., Maximizing biofuel production in a thermochemical biorefinery by adding electrolytic hydrogen and by integrating torrefaction with entrained flow gasification. Energy 85 (2015), 94–104.
80. 2. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 56 (2016), 116–132.
81. [81] Methling, T., Armbrust, N., Haitz, T., Speidel, M., Poboss, N., Braun-Unkhoff, M., et al. Power generation based on biomass by combined fermentation and gasification – a new concept derived from experiments and modelling. Bioresour Technol 169 (2014), 510–517.
82. [82] Moncada, J., Cardona, C.A., Higuita, J.C., Vélez, J.J., López-Suarez, F.E., Wood residue (Pinus patula bark) as an alternative feedstock for producing ethanol and furfural in Colombia: experimental, techno-economic and environmental assessments. Chem Eng Sci 140 (2016), 309–318.
83. [83] Ekman, A., Wallberg, O., Joelsson, E., Börjesson, P., Possibilities for sustainable biorefineries based on agricultural residues – a case study of potential straw-based ethanol production in Sweden. Appl Energy 102 (2013), 299–308.
84. 2 utilization for maximum biomass conversion. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47 (2015), 151–161.
85. [85] Moncada, J., Tamayo, J.A., Cardona, C.A., Integrating first, second, and third generation biorefineries: incorporating microalgae into the sugarcane biorefinery. Chem Eng Sci 118 (2014), 126–140.
86. [86] Budzianowski, W.M., Negative carbon intensity of renewable energy technologies involving biomass or carbon dioxide as inputs. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:9 (2012), 6507–6521.
87. [87] Zhu, L., Biorefinery as a promising approach to promote microalgae industry: an innovative framework. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41 (2015), 1376–1384.
88. 2 as a feedstock for the production of algal-based biofuels. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 9 (2015), 72–81.
89. [89] Subhadra, B.G., Edwards, M., An integrated renewable energy park approach for algal biofuel production in United States. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 4897–4902.
90. [90] Subhadra, B.G., Sustainability of algal biofuel production using integrated renewable energy park (IREP) and algal biorefinery approach. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 5892–5901.
91. [91] Abate, S., Lanzafame, P., Perathoner, S., Centi, G., New sustainable model of biorefineries: biofactories and challenges of integrating bio- and solar refineries. ChemSusChem 8:17 (2015), 2854–2866.
92. [92] Fortier, M.-O., Griffin, P., Roberts, W., Stagg-Williams, S.M., Sturm, B.S.M., Life cycle assessment of bio-jet fuel from hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae. Appl Energy 122 (2014), 73–82.
93. [93] Joelsson, E., Erdei, B., Galbe, M., Wallberg, O., Techno-economic evaluation of integrated first- and second-generation ethanol production from grain and straw. Biotechnol Biofuels, 9(1), 2016, 1.
94. [94] Thomsen, T.P., Ahrenfeldt, J., Thomsen, S.T., Assessment of a novel alder biorefinery concept to meet demands of economic feasibility, energy production and long term environmental sustainability. Biomass Bioenergy 53 (2013), 81–94.
95. [95] Tonini, D., Hamelin, L., Astrup, T.F., Environmental implications of the use of agro-industrial residues for biorefineries: application of a deterministic model for indirect land-use changes. GCB Bioenergy 8 (2016), 690–706.
96. [96] Ssegane, H., Negri, M.C., Quinn, J., Urgun-Demirtas, M., Multifunctional landscapes: site characterization and field-scale design to incorporate biomass production into an agricultural system. Biomass Bioenergy 80 (2015), 179–190.
97. [97] Holland, R.A., Eigenbrod, F., Muggeridge, A., Brown, G., Clarke, D., Taylor, G., A synthesis of the ecosystem services impact of second generation bioenergy crop production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 46 (2015), 30–40.
98. [98] Girotto, F., Alibardi, L., Cossu, R., Food waste generation and industrial uses: a review. Waste Manage 45 (2015), 32–41.
99. [99] Lopolito, A., Prosperi, M., Sisto, R., De Meo, E., Translating local stakeholders’ perception in rural development strategies under uncertainty conditions: an application to the case of the bio-based economy in the area of Foggia (South Italy). J Rural Stud 37 (2015), 61–74.
100. [100] Chen, H., Percival, Zhang.Y., New biorefineries and sustainable agriculture: increased food, biofuels, and ecosystem security. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47 (2015), 117–132.
101. [101] Santibañez-Aguilar, J.E., González-Campos, J.B., Ponce-Ortega, J.M., Serna-González, M., El-Halwagi, M.M., Optimal planning and site selection for distributed multiproduct biorefineries involving economic, environmental and social objectives. J Clean Prod 65 (2014), 270–294.
102. [102] Miret, C., Chazara, P., Montastruc, L., Negny, S., Domenech, S., Design of bioethanol green supply chain: comparison between first and second generation biomass concerning economic, environmental and social criteria. Comput Chem Eng 85 (2016), 16–35.
103. [103] Martínez-Guido, S.I., González-Campos, J.B., Ponce-Ortega, J.M., Nápoles-Rivera, F., El-Halwagi, M.M., Optimal reconfiguration of a sugar cane industry to yield an integrated biorefinery. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:2 (2016), 553–562.
104. [104] Elfvengren, K., Karvonen, M., Klemola, K., Lehtovaara, M., The future of decentralised energy systems: insights from a Delphi study. Int J Energy Technol Policy 10:3–4 (2014), 265–279.
105. [105] Bowling, I.M., Ponce-Ortega, J.M., El-Halwagi, M.M., Facility location and supply chain optimization for a biorefinery. Ind Eng Chem Res 50 (2011), 6276–6286.
106. [106] Kurian, J.K., Nair, G.R., Hussain, A., Vijaya Raghavan, G.S., Feedstocks, logistics and pre-treatment processes for sustainable lignocellulosic biorefineries: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25 (2013), 205–219.
107. [107] Andiappan, V., Ko, A.S.Y., Lau, V.W.S., Ng, L., Ng, R.T.L., Chemmangattuvalappil, N.G., et al. Synthesis of sustainable integrated biorefinery via reaction pathway synthesis: economic, incremental environmental burden and energy assessment with multiobjective optimization. AIChE J 61:1 (2015), 132–146.
108. [108] Sharma, P., Sarker, B.R., Romagnoli, J.A., A decision support tool for strategic planning of sustainable biorefineries. Comput Chem Eng 35:9 (2011), 1767–1781.
109. [109] Kokossis, A.C., Tsakalova, M., Pyrgakis, K., Design of integrated biorefineries. Comput Chem Eng 81 (2015), 40–56.
110. [110] Schmidt, I., Meurer, M., Saling, P., Reuter, W., Kicherer, A., Gensch, C.O., How to measure social impacts? A socio-eco-efficiency analysis by the SEEBALANCE® method. Int J Sustain Dev 11:1 (2008), 1–23.
111. [111] Clavreul, J., Baumeister, H., Christensen, T.H., Damgaard, A., An environmental assessment system for environmental technologies. Environ Modell Softw 60 (2014), 18–30.
112. [112] Martinez-Hernandez, E., Campbell, G., Sadhukhan, J., Economic value and environmental impact (EVEI) analysis of biorefinery systems. Chem Eng Res Des 91:8 (2013), 1418–1426.
113. [113] Sukumara, S., Amundson, J., Badurdeen, F., Seay, J., A comprehensive techno-economic analysis tool to validate long-term viability of emerging biorefining processes. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:7 (2015), 1793–1806.
114. [114] Tan, R.R., Andiappan, V., Wan, Y.K., Ng, R.T.L., Ng, D.K.S., An optimization-based cooperative game approach for systematic allocation of costs and benefits in interplant process integration. Chem Eng Res Des 106 (2016), 43–58.
115. [115] Mansoornejad, B., Sanaei, S., Gilani, B., Benali, M., Stuart, P., Application of Process Systems Engineering (PSE) tools in designing the biorefinery. Comput Aided Chem Eng 34 (2014), 555–560.