Perceiving depth: Optical versus video see-through

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST

Volumn 02-04-November-2016, Issue , 2016, Pages 237-240

  Medeiros, Daniel ^a,b   Sousa, Maurício ^a   Mendes, Daniel ^a   Raposo, Alberto ^c   Jorge, Joaquim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b MINISTRY OF EDUCATION OF BRAZIL   (Brazil)

^c PUC Rio Brazil   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Depth perception; See through system; User evaluation

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED REALITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISPLAY DEVICES; HELMET MOUNTED DISPLAYS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

COMPLEX ENGINEERING; HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAYS; OPTICAL SEE-THROUGH; REAL WORLD SETTING; SEAMLESS INTEGRATION; SEE-THROUGH SYSTEM; USER EVALUATIONS; VIRTUAL AND AUGMENTED REALITY;

VIDEO CAMERAS;

EID: 84998842353     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2993369.2993388     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. CUTTING, J. E. 2003. Reconceiving perceptual space. In Looking into Pictures, H. Hecht, R. Schwartz, and M. Atherton, Eds. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. EDWARDS, E., ROLLAND, J., AND KELLER, K. 1993. Video seethrough design for merging of real and virtual environments. In IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.
3. GOGEL, W. C., AND DA SILVA, J. A. 1987. Familiar size and the theory of off-sized perceptions. Perception & Psychophysics 41.
4. IWAMOTO, K., AND ISHIKAWA, J. 2013. High resolution binocular video see-through display for interactive work support-development of system and evaluation of depth perception and pegin-hole tasks. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
5. KELLY, J. W., BEALL, A. C., AND LOOMIS, J. M. 2004. Perception of shared visual space: Establishing common ground in real and virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13, 4.
6. KELLY, J. W., LOOMIS, J. M., AND BEALL, A. C. 2004. Judgments of exocentric direction in large-scale space. Perception 33.
7. LIZANDRA, M. C. J., AND CALATRAVA, J. 2011. An Augmented Reality System for the Treatment of Phobia to Small Animals Viewed Via an Optical See-Through HMD: Comparison With a Similar System Viewed Via a Video See-Through HMD. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction 27.
8. LOOMIS, J. M., AND KNAPP, J. M. 2003. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. Virtual and adaptive environments, 11.
9. ROLLAND, J. P., AND FUCHS, H. 2000. Optical versus video seethrough head-mounted displays in medical visualization. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9, 3.
10. STEPTOE, W., JULIER, S., AND STEED, A. 2014. Presence and discernability in conventional and non-photorealistic immersive augmented reality. In IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.
11. SWAN II, J. E., JONES, A., KOLSTAD, E., LIVINGSTON, M. A., AND SMALLMAN, H. S. 2007. Egocentric depth judgments in optical, see-through augmented reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 3 (May).