Supply Chains, Material Linkage and Regional Development: A Reply

Urban Studies

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 775-778

  Twomey, J ^a   Tomkins, Judith M ^b  

^a Technology House   (United Kingdom)

^b MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84998183283     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0042098984754     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Brand, S. (1997) Supply chains, material linkage and regional development: a comment, Urban Studies, 35, pp. 769–773.
2. Flegg, A.T., Webber, C.D. and Elliott, M.V. (1995) On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input-output tables, Regional Studies, 29, pp. 547–561.
3. Jensen, R.C. (1990) Construction and use of regional input-output models: progress and prospects, International Regional Science Review, 13, pp. 9–25.
4. Sonis, M. and Hewings, G.J.D. (1992) Coefficient change in input-output models: theory and applications, Economic Systems Research, 4, pp. 143–157.
5. Twomey, J. and Tomkins, J.M. (1996a) Supply chains, material linkage and regional development, Urban Studies, 33, pp. 937–954.
6. Twomey, J. and Tomkins, J.M. (1996b) Supply potential in the regions of Great Britain, Regional Studies, 30, pp. 795–802.
7. West, G.R. (1982) Sensitivity and key sector analysis in input-output models, Australian Economic Papers, 21, pp. 365–378.
8. Willis, K.G. (1987) Spatially disaggregated input-output tables: an evaluation and comparison of survey and nonsurvey results, Environment and Planning A, 19, pp. 107–116.