Performing the Real: Documentary Diversions

Television & New Media

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 255-269

  Corner, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84998183113     PISSN: 15274764     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/152747640200300302     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Blumler, Jay. 1999. Political Communication Systems All Change: A Response to Kees Brants. European Journal of Communication 14 (2): 241–249.
2. Bondebjerg, Ib. 1996. Public Discourse/Private Fascination: Hybridization in “True Life Story” Genres. Media, Culture and Society 18 (1): 27–45.
3. Brants, Kees. 1998. Whose Afraid of Infotainment? European Journal of Communication 13 (3): 315–335.
4. Corner, John. 1996. The Art of Record. Manchester, NY: Manchester University Press.
5. Corner, John. 2000. What Can We Say about Documentary? Media, Culture and Society 22 (5): 681–688.
6. Dovey, John. 2000. Freakshow: First Person Media and Factual Television. London: Pluto.
7. Ellis, John. 1999. Seeing Things: Television in the Age of Uncertainty. London: I. B. Tauris.
8. Hardy, Forsyth, ed. 1979. Grierson on Documentary. London: Faber.
9. Hartley, John. 1996. Popular Reality. London: Arnold.
10. Kilborn, Richard. 1994. How Real Can You Get? Recent Developments in Reality Television. European Journal of Communication 9 (4): 421–439.
11. Lury, Karen. 1996. Television Performance: Being, Acting and “Corpsing.”New Formations 27 (Winter 1995–96): 114–127.
12. Nichols, Bill. 1991. Representing Reality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13. Winston, Brian. 2000. Lies, Damned Lies and Documentary. London: British Film Institute.