Media Policy, Audiences, and Social Demand: Research at the Interface of Policy Studies and Audience Studies

Television & New Media

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 95-115

  Raboy, Marc ^a   Abramson, Bram Dov ^a   Proulx, Serge ^a   Welters, Roxanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84998075659     PISSN: 15274764     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/152747640100200202     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allor, M. 1988. Relocating the Site of the Audience. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5 (3): 217-233.
2. Ang, I. 1991. Desperately Seeking the Audience. London: Routledge.
3. Atkinson, D., and M. Raboy. 1997. Public Service Broadcasting: The Challenge of the Twenty-First Century. Reports and Papers on Mass Communication 111. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
4. Bennett, T. 1992. Putting Policy into Cultural Studies. InCultural Studies, edited by L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, and P. Treichler, 23-37. London: Routledge.
5. Braman, S. 1995. Horizons of the State: Information Policy and Power. Journal of Communication 45 (4): 4-24.
6. Brunt, R. 1992. Engaging with the Popular: Audiences for Mass Culture and What to Say about Them. InCultural Studies, edited by L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, and P. Treichler, 69-76. London: Routledge.
7. Canada. 1991. Statutes of Canada. 38-39 Elizabeth II, c. 11.
8. Cave, M., and W. H. Melody. 1989. Models of Broadcast Regulation: The UK and North American Experience. InFreedom in Broadcasting, edited by C. Veljanovski, 224-255. Westminster, UK: The Institute of Economic Affairs.
9. Cobley, P. 1994. Throwing Out the Baby: Populism and Active Audience Theory. Media, Culture and Society, 16 (4): 677-687.
10. Corner, J. 1991. Meaning, Genre and Context: The Problematics of “Public Knowledge” in the New Audience Studies. InMass Media and Society, edited by J. Curran and M. Gurevitch, 267-284. London: Edward Arnold.
11. Cunningham, S. 1992. Framing Culture: Criticism and Policy in Australia. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
12. Dahlgren, P. 1995. Television and the Public Sphere: Citizenship, Democracy and the Media. London: Sage.
13. Entman, R. M., and S. S. Wildman. 1992. Reconciling Economic and Non-economic Perspectives on Media Policy: Transcending the “Marketplace of Ideas. ” Journal of Communication 42 (1): 5-19.
14. Gandy, O., ed. 1995. Colloquy on Political Economy and Cultural Studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 12:60-100.
15. Golding, P., and G. Murdock. 1991. Culture, Communications, and Political Economy. InMass Media and Society, edited by J. Curran and M. Gurevitch, 15-32. London: Edward Arnold.
16. Gomery, D. 1993. The Centrality of Media Economics. Journal of Communication 43 (3): 190-198.
17. Habermas, J. 1989. Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Habermas, J. 1992. Further Reflections on the Public Sphere. InHabermas and the Public Sphere, edited by C. Calhoun, 421-461. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Hagins, J. 1996. The Inconvenient Public Interest: Policy Challenges in the Age of Information. Journal of Applied Communications Research 24 (2): 83-92.
21. Hammersley, M. 1992. What's Wrong with Ethnography? Methodological Exploration. London: Routledge.
22. Hartley, J. 1988. The Real World of Audiences. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5 (3): 234-2538.
23. Jensen, K. B., and K. E. Rosengren. 1990. Five Traditions in Search of the Audience. European Journal of Communication 5 (2/3): 207-238.
24. Katz, E., J. G. Blumler, and M. Gurevitch. 1974. Utilization of Mass Communication by the Individual. InThe Uses of Mass Communication: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research, edited by J. Blumler and E. Katz, 19-32. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Katz, E., M. Gurevitch, and H. Haas. 1973. On the Use of the Mass Media for Important Things. American Sociological Review 38: 164-181.
26. Livingstone, S. 1996. Rethinking Audiences: Towards a New Research Agenda. Paper presented at the International Communications Association Conference, Chicago, May.
27. Lull, J. 1996. The Political Correctness of Cultural Studies. Paper presented at the International Association of Mass Communications Research Conference, Sydney, Australia, August.
28. Malm, K., and R. Wallis. 1992. Media Policy and Music Activity. London: Routledge.
29. Malo, G., and L. Giroux. 1998. La Mesure Industrielle des Auditoires [The Industrial Measurement of Audiences]. InAccusé de Réception: Le Téléspectateur Construit par les Sciences Sociales [Acknowledgment of Reception: The Television Viewer Constructed by Social Science], edited by S. Proulx, 15-46. Quebec City, Canada: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.
30. McQuail, D. 1994. Media Policy Research: Conditions for Progress. InMass Communication Research. On Problems and Policies. The Art of Asking the Right Questions. In Honor of James D. Halloran, edited by C. J. Hamelink and O. Linné, 39-51. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
31. McQuail, D., and K. Siune. 1986. New Media Politics: Comparative Perspectives in Western Europe. London: Sage.
32. McQuail, D. 1998. Media Policy: Convergence, Concentration and Commerce. London: Sage.
33. McRobbie, A. 1996. All the World's a Stage, Screen or Magazine: When Culture Is the Logic of Late Capitalism. Media, Culture & Society 18: 335-342.
34. Melody, W. H. 1990. Communication Policy in the Global Information Economy: Whither the Public Interest?InPublic Communication: The New Imperatives, edited by M. Ferguson, 16-39. London: Sage.
35. Miller, P., and N. Rose. 1992. Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government. British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 173-205.
36. Miller, T. 1996. Cultural Citizenship and Technologies of the Subject, or Where Did You Go, Paul Dimaggio? Culture and Policy 7 (1): 141-156.
37. Morley, D. 1992. Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
38. Morris, M. 1988. Banality in Cultural Studies. Discourse X (2): 3-29.
39. Mouffe, C., ed. 1992. Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community. London: Verso.
40. Mueller, M. 1995. Why Communication Policy Is Passing “Mass Communication” By: Political Economy as the Missing Link. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 12 (4): 457-472.
41. Murdock, G. 1992. Citizens, Consumers and Public Culture. InMedia Cultures: Reappraising Transnational Media, edited by M. Skovmand and K. Schroder, 17-41. London: Routledge.
42. Nerone, J. C., ed. 1995. Last Rights: Revisiting Four Theories of the Press. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
43. Niec, H. 1998. Cultural Rights at the End of the World Decade for Cultural Development [online]. Paper presented at the Virtual Conference on the Right to Communicate and the Communication of Rights, Videazimut. Available: http://commposite.uqam.ca/videaz/docs/hanien.html.
44. Noam, E. 1993. Reconnecting Communications Studies with Communications Policy. Journal of Communication 43 (3): 199-206.
45. O'Regan, T. 1992. Some Reflections on the “Policy Moment.” Meanjin 51 (3): 517-332.
46. Price, M. E. 1995. Television, the Public Sphere, and National Identity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47. Proulx, S., and M. Raboy. Forthcoming. Entre Politiques et Usages: Les Téléspectateurs Jugent la Television [Between Policy and Uses: Viewers Judge Television]. InLa Télévision et Ses Influences [Television and Its Influences], edited by D. Courbet and M. P. Fourquet. Paris: CNRS Éditions.
48. Proulx, S., G. Stoiciu, J.-P. Laurendeau, D. Maillet, and R. Ouimet. 1993. Usages de la Télévision et Qualité de la Vie Familiale: Construction et Validation d'instruments de Recherche dans une Perspective Ethnosociologique [Uses of Television and Quality of Family Life: Construction and Validation of Research Instruments in an Ethnosociological Perspective]. Montreal, Canada: Groupe de recherche sur les médias, Université du Québec à Montréal.
49. Raboy, M. 1999. Communication Policy and Globalization as a Social Project. In Communication, Citizenship, and Social Policy: Re-thinking the Limits of the Welfare State, edited by A. Calabrese and J-C Burgelman, 293-310. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
50. Raboy, M., and B. D. Abramson. 1998. Grasping an Enigma—Cultural Policy and Social Demand. Cultural Policy 4 (2): 1-27.
51. Raboy, M., I. Bernier, F. Sauvageau, and D. Atkinson. 1994. Cultural Development and the Open Economy: A Democratic Issue and a Challenge to Public Policy. Canadian Journal of Communication 19 (3/4): 291-315.
52. Taylor, C. 1989. Cross-purposes: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate. InLiberalism and the Moral Life, edited by N. Rosenblum, 159-182. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Thomas, A. M. 1960. Audience, Market and Public: An Evaluation of Canadian Broadcasting. Canadian Communications 1 (1): 16-47.
54. Thompson, J. B. 1990. Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
55. Thompson, J. B. 1995. The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
56. van Steenbergen, B., ed. 1994. The Condition of Citizenship. London: Sage.
57. Venturelli, S. 1998. Cultural Rights and World Trade Agreements in the Information Society. Gazette 60 (1): 47-76.