Guest Editor's Introduction: Working Together: Challenges in Collaborative Research on Violence Against Women

Violence Against Women

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 1099-1117

  Riger, Stephanie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84998075595     PISSN: 10778012     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/10778019922183273     Document Type: Editorial

References (40)

1. Altman, D. G. (1995). Sustaining interventions in community systems: On the relationship between researchers and communities. Health Psychology, 14, 526-536.
2. Andersen, M. (1981). Corporate wives: Longing for liberation or satisfied with the status quo? Urban Life, 10, 311-327.
3. Block, C. R. Engel, B. Naureckas, S. M. & Riordan, K. A. (1999). Chicago Women's Health Risk Study: Lessons in collaboration. Violence Against Women, 5(10), 1158-1177.
4. Brown, P. (1995). The role of the evaluator in comprehensive community initiatives. In J. Connell, A. Kubisch, L. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss, (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives (pp. 201-225). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
5. Campbell, J. Dienemann, J. Kub, J. Wurmser, T. & Loy, E. (1999). Collaboration as a partnership. Violence Against Women, 5(10), 1140-1157.
6. Cancian, F. M. (1993). Conflicts between activist research and academic success: Participatory research and alternative strategies. American Sociologist, 24, 92-106.
7. Chavis, D. Stucky, P. & Wandersman, A. (1983). Returning basic research to the community: A relationship between scientist and citizen. American Psychologist, 38, 424-434.
8. Edleson, J. (1998, July). Forced bonding or community collaboration? Partnerships between science and practice in research on woman battering. Paper presented at the National Institute of Justice Annual Conference on Criminal Justice Research and Evaluation: Viewing Crime and Justice From a Collaborative Perspective, Washington, DC.
9. Fine, M. (1989). The politics of research and activism: Violence against women. Gender & Society, 3, 549-558.
10. Fine, M. (1992). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11. Gelles, R. J. (1994). Research and advocacy: Can one wear two hats? Family Process, 33, 93-95.
12. Gilfus, M. E. Fineran, S. Cohan, D. J. Jensen, S. A. Hartwick, L. & Spath, R. (1999). Research on violence against women: Creating survivor-informed collaborations. Violence Against Women, 5(10), 1194-1212.
13. Gondolf, E. Yllo, K. & Campbell, J. (1997). Collaboration between researchers and advocates. In G. K. Kantor, & J. Jasinski, (Eds.), Out of darkness: Contemporary research perspectives on family violence (pp. 255-267). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Gordon, M. T. & Riger, S. (1989). The female fear: The social cost of rape. New York: Free Press.
15. Gorelick, S. (1991). Contradictions of feminist methodology. Gender & Society, 5, 459-477.
16. Hall, B. L. (1992). From margins to center? The development and purpose of participatory research. American Sociologist, 23, 14-28.
17. Israel, B. A. Schurman, S. J. & Hugentobler, M. K. (1992). Conducting action research: Relationships between organization members and researchers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28, 74-101.
18. Jacobson, N. S. (1994). Rewards and dangers in researching domestic violence. Family Process, 33, 81-85.
19. Koss, M. (1998, August). Does feminist rape research stand up to attack? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
20. Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 257-277.
21. Lennett, J. & Colten, M. E. (1999). A winning alliance: Collaboration of advocates and researchers on the Massachusetts Mothers Survey. Violence Against Women, 5(10), 1118-1139.
22. Levin, R. (1999). Participatory evaluation: Researchers and service providers as collaborators versus adversaries. Violence Against Women, 5(10), 1213-1227.
23. Lundy, M. Massat, C. R. Smith, J. & Bhasin, S. (1996). Constructing the research enterprise: Building research bridges between private agencies, public agencies, and universities. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 20, 169-176.
24. Lykes, M. B. (1989). Dialogue with Guatemalan Indian women: Critical perspectives on constructing collaborative research. In R. K. Unger, (Ed.), Representations: Social constructions of gender (pp. 167-185). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
25. Mangham, I. L. (1993). Conspiracies of silence? Some critical comments on the action research. Human Relations, 46, 1243-1251.
26. Moran-Ellis, J. (1996). Close to home: The experience of researching child sexual abuse. In M. Hester, L. Kelly, & J. Radford, (Eds.), Women, violence and male power (pp. 176-197). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
27. Nyden, P. & Wiewel, W. (1992). Collaborative research: Harnessing the tensions between researcher and practitioner. American Sociologist, 23, 43-55.
28. Park, P. (1992). The discovery of participatory research as a new scientific paradigm: Personal and intellectual accounts. American Sociologist, 23, 29-42.
29. Petras, E. M. & Porpora, D. V. (1993). Participatory research: Three models and an analysis. American Sociologist, 24, 107-125.
30. Reason, P. (1993). Sitting between appreciation and disappointment: A critique of the special edition of Human Relations on action research. Human Relations, 46, 1253-1270.
31. Renzetti, C. (1997). Confessions of a reformed positivist: Feminist participatory research as good social science. In M. D. Schwartz, (Ed.), Researching sexual violence against women: Methodological and personal perspectives (pp. 131-143). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Riger, S. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and the study of women. American Psychologist, 47, 730-740.
33. Riger, S. (1994). Challenges of success: Stages of growth in feminist organizations. Feminist Studies, 20, 275-300.
34. Saegert, S. (1993). Charged contexts: Difference, emotion and power in environmental design research. Architecture & Behavior, 9, 69-84.
35. Schmidt, J. D. & Sherman, L. W. (1993). Does arrest deter domestic violence? American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 601-609.
36. Sherman, L. W. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York: Free Press.
37. Stanko, E. (1997). “I second that emotion”: Reflections on feminism, emotionality, and research on sexual violence. In M. D. Schwartz, (Ed.), Researching sexual violence against women: Methodological and personal perspectives (pp. 74-85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Stoecker, R. & Bonacich, E. (1992). Why participatory research? Guest editors' introduction. American Sociologist, 23, 5-14.
39. Urban, B. Y. & Bennett, L. W. (1999). When the community punches a time clock: Evaluating a collaborative workplace domestic abuse prevention program. Violence Against Women, 5(10), 1178-1193.
40. Wiewel, W. & Lieber, M. (1998). Goal achievement, relationship building, and incrementalism: The challenges of university-community partnerships. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17, 291-301.