Geobrowsing: Creative thinking and knowledge discovery using geographic visualization

Information Visualization

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 80-91

  Peuquet, Donna J ^a   Kraak, Menno Jan ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Geographic visualization; graphic interaction; human computer interface; knowledge discovery

Indexed keywords

EID: 84998044386     PISSN: 14738716     EISSN: 14738724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500007     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Finke RA, Ward TB, Smith SM. Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1992; 205 pp.
2. Board C. Cartographic communication. Cartographica 1981; 18: 42–78.
3. Robinson AH, Petchenik BB. The nature of maps. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1976; 138pp.
4. Stea D, Blaut JM, Stephens J. Mapping as a cultural universal. In: PortugaliJ, (Ed.). The Construction of Cognitive Maps. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1996; 345–360.
5. Sims JS, Hagendorn JG, Ketcham PM, Satterfield SG, Griffin TJ, George WL, Fowler HA, Amende BA, Hung HK, Bohn RB, Koontz JE, Warren JA, Feder DL, Clark CW, Filla BJ. Accelerating Scientific Discovery Through Computation and Visualization. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 2000; 105: 875–894.
6. Card SK, MacKinlay JD, Shneiderman B. Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1999.
7. MacEachren AM, Kraak MJ. Research challenges in geovisualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 2001; 28: 3–12.
8. Fabrikant S. Spatialized browsing in large data archives. Transactions in GIS 2000; 4: 65–78.
9. Blaut JM, Stea D. Studies of Geographic Learning. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1971; 61: 387–393.
10. Landau B. Early map use as an unlearned ability. Cognition 1986; 22: 201–223.
11. Presson C, Hazelrigg M. Building Spatial Representations through Primary and Secondary Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1984; 10: 716–772.
12. Cosgrove D. Introduction: Mapping Meaning. In: CosgroveD, (Ed.). Mappings Reaktion Books, Ltd.: London, UK, 1999; 1–23.
13. DiBiase D. Visualization in earth sciences. Earth & Mineral Sciences, Bulletin of the College of Earth and Mineral Sciences 1990; 59: 13–18.
14. Peuquet DJ. Representations of Geographic Space: Toward a Conceptual Synthesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1988; 78: 375–394.
15. MacEachren AM. How maps work: representation, visualization, and design. Guilford Press: New York, USA, 1995.
16. Bertin J. Graphics and Graphic Information-Processing. Walter de Gruyter (French edn, 1977): Berlin, Germany, 1981; 267pp.
17. Bertin J. Semiology of Graphics. The University of Wisconsin Press (French edn, 1967): Madison, WI, USA, 1983; 415pp.
18. Fabrikant SI, Buttenfield B. Envisioning user access to a large data archive. GIS/LIS 1997 (Cincinatti, OH, USA, 1997).
19. Unwin D, Fisher PF, (Eds). Virtual reality in geography. Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 2001; 304pp.
20. Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Third edn. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1996; 212pp.
21. Miller AI. Metaphors in Creative Scientific Thought. Creativity Research Journal 1996; 9: 113–130.
22. Schank RC. The Creative Attitude: Learning to Ask and Answer the Right Questions. Macmillan: New York, USA, 1988; 372pp.
23. Keller PR, Keller MM. Visual cues, practical data visualization. IEEE Press: Piscataway, USA, 1992; 229pp.
24. Tufte ER. The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press: Cheshire, CT, USA, 1983; 197pp.
25. Friendly M. Re-Visions of Minard. Statistical Computing and Graphics Newsletter 2000; 11: 13–19.
26. Robinson AH. The thematic maps of Charles Joseph Minard. Imago Mundi 1967; 21: 95–108.
27. Roth SF, Chuah MC, Kerpedjiev S, Kolojejchick J, Lucas P. Towards an Information Visualization Workspace: Combining Multiple Means of Expression. Human-Computer Interaction Journal 1997; 12: 131–185.
28. Spence R. Information visualization. Addison Wesley/ACM Press Books: Harlow, 2001; 206pp.
29. Dykes J. Exploring spatial data representation with dynamic graphics. Computers & Geosciences 1997; 23: 345–370.
30. Larkin JH, Simon HA. Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science 1987; ii: 65–99.
31. Mistrick T. The effects of brightness contrast on figure-ground discrimination for black and white maps. In: Department of Geography. The Pennsylvania State University: University Park, PA, USA, 1990.
32. Pinker S, Finke RA. Emergent two-dimensional patterns in images rotated in depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1980; 6: 224–264.
33. Finke RA, Pinker S, Farah MJ. Reinterpreting visual patterns in mental imagery. Cognitive Science 1989; 13: 51–78.
34. Gick ML, Holyoak KJ. Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology 1980; 12: 306–355.
35. Gick ML, Holyoak KJ. Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology 1983; 15: 1–38.
36. Dunker K. On Problem Solving. Psychological Monographs 1945 58(5): No. 270.
37. Vosniadou S, Ortony A. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1989.
38. Luchins AS, Luchins EH. Rigidity of Behavior. University of Oregon Press: Eugene, OR, USA, 1959; 281pp.
39. Reason JT, Lucas D. Using cognitive diaries to investigate naturally occurring memory blocks. In: HarrisJ, MorrisPE, (Ed.). Everyday Memory, Actions, and Absent Mindedness. Academic Press: New York, 1984; 53–70.
40. Smith SM, Blankenship SE. Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. American Journal of Psychology 1991; 104: 61–87.
41. Way EC. Knowledge Representation and Metaphor. In: FetzerJH, (Ed.). Studies in Cognitive Systems. Vol. 7. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991; 271pp.
42. Slocum TA, Blok C, Jiang B, Koussoulakou A, Montello DR, Fuhrmann S, Headley N. Cognitive and usability issues in geovisualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 2001; 28: 61–75.
43. Haug D, MacEachren AM, Hardisty F. The challenge of analyzing geovisualization tool use: Taking a visual approach. 20th International Cartographic Conference (Beijing, China, 2001), ICA.