메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 703-726

‘Savage democracy’ and ‘principle of anarchy’

(1)  Abensour, Miguel a  

a NONE

Author keywords

anarchy; democracy; domination; Heidegger; Lefort; Machiavelli; politics; savage democracy; Schurmann; totalitarianism

Indexed keywords


EID: 84998021958     PISSN: 01914537     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/019145370202800606     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (14)

References (22)
  • 4
    • 24944512035 scopus 로고
    • Sur la démocratie: le politique et l'institution du social
    • See
    • See Claude Lefort and M. Gauchet, ‘Sur la démocratie: le politique et l'institution du social’, Textures 2–3 (1971): 8–9.
    • (1971) Textures , vol.2-3 , pp. 8-9
    • Lefort, C.1    Gauchet, M.2
  • 5
    • 0003821164 scopus 로고
    • Translator's note: The implicit reference is the work of the French ethnologist Pierre Clastres (1934–1977), whose research was centered on the essential distinction between the political power exercised within tribal societies and the historically specific form of political power based on coercion; namely, the state. See, New York: Zone Books, and his Archeology of Violence (New York: Semiotext(e), 1994)
    • Translator's note: The implicit reference is the work of the French ethnologist Pierre Clastres (1934–1977), whose research was centered on the essential distinction between the political power exercised within tribal societies and the historically specific form of political power based on coercion; namely, the state. See Pierre Clastres, Society Against the State (New York: Zone Books, 1987) and his Archeology of Violence (New York: Semiotext(e), 1994).
    • (1987) Society Against the State
    • Clastres, P.1
  • 6
    • 33846343395 scopus 로고
    • The Question of Democracy
    • Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, translation modified
    • Claude Lefort, ‘The Question of Democracy’, in Democracy and Political Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988), p. 19; translation modified.
    • (1988) Democracy and Political Theory , pp. 19
    • Lefort, C.1
  • 7
    • 55449083993 scopus 로고
    • La Communication démocratique
    • September–October
    • Claude Lefort and P. Thibaud, ‘La Communication démocratique’, Esprit 9–10 (September–October 1979): 34.
    • (1979) Esprit , vol.9-10 , pp. 34
    • Lefort, C.1    Thibaud, P.2
  • 10
    • 84870128196 scopus 로고
    • Le sens de la phénoménologie dans Le Visible et L'Invisible
    • See, June
    • See Marc Richir, ‘Le sens de la phénoménologie dans Le Visible et L'Invisible’, Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Esprit 6 (June 1982): 132.
    • (1982) Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Esprit , vol.6 , pp. 132
    • Richir, M.1
  • 11
    • 53249148410 scopus 로고
    • Because in the following pages I quote extensively from Schürmann's book, the references will be indicated in the essay itself. Translator's note: although the page numbers refer to the English edition, I have modified for reasons of content or clarity some of the citations using the original, Paris: Seuil
    • Because in the following pages I quote extensively from Schürmann's book, the references will be indicated in the essay itself. Translator's note: although the page numbers refer to the English edition, I have modified for reasons of content or clarity some of the citations using the original (Le Principe d'anarchie, Heidegger et la question d'agir (Paris: Seuil, 1982)).
    • (1982) Le Principe d'anarchie, Heidegger et la question d'agir
  • 16
    • 0004198381 scopus 로고
    • No doubt one should understand ‘element’ in relation to the meaning attributed it by, such that ‘it was used to speak of water, of air, of earth, of fire, that is, in the sense of a general thing, in midway between the spatio-temporal individual and the idea, a sort of incarnate principle that brings a style of being wherever there is a fragment of being’, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press
    • No doubt one should understand ‘element’ in relation to the meaning attributed it by Merleau-Ponty, such that ‘it was used to speak of water, of air, of earth, of fire, that is, in the sense of a general thing, in midway between the spatio-temporal individual and the idea, a sort of incarnate principle that brings a style of being wherever there is a fragment of being’. The Visible and the Invisible (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1968, p. 139).
    • (1968) The Visible and the Invisible , pp. 139
    • Merleau-Ponty1
  • 17
    • 84998160096 scopus 로고
    • Le Désordre nouveau
    • E. Morin, J.-M. Coudray and Claude Lefort, Paris, Fayard
    • Claude Lefort, ‘Le Désordre nouveau’, in E. Morin, J.-M. Coudray and Claude Lefort, Mai 1968, la Brèche (Paris, Fayard, 1968), p. 49.
    • (1968) Mai 1968, la Brèche , pp. 49
    • Lefort, C.1
  • 18
    • 85048153208 scopus 로고
    • Transcendental Dialectic
    • New York: Prometheus Books, Book I, sec. I
    • I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (New York: Prometheus Books, 1990), ‘Transcendental Dialectic’, Book I, sec. I, p. 200.
    • (1990) Critique of Pure Reason , pp. 200
    • Kant, I.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.