Reporting Choice and the 1992 Proxy Disclosure Rules

Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 497-515

  Murphy, Kevin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84997994340     PISSN: 0148558X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0148558X9601100315     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Black F., Scholes M. 1973. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy 81, no. 3 (May/June): 637-654.
2. DeAngelo L. E. 1988. “Managerial Competition, Information Costs, and Corporate Governance: The Use of Accounting Performance Measures in Proxy Contests.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 10 (1): 3-36.
3. Gibbons R., Murphy K. J. 1990. “Relative Performance Evaluation for Chief Executive Officers.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review.
4. Healy P. M. 1985. “The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 7, nos. 1-3 (April): 85-107.
5. Nesbitt S. 1994. “Long-Term Rewards from Corporate Governance.” Mimeo. Wilshire Associates.
6. Jensen M. C., Murphy K. J. 1990. “Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (2): 225-264.
7. Watts R. L., Zimmerman J. L. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
8. Yermack D. 1994. “Under-Valuation of Executive Stock Options in Corporate Proxy Statements.” Working paper. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.