The impact of undergraduate preservice teachers’ use of hypermedia to review lecture notes

Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 292-304

  Ruffini, Michael F ^a  

^a Delaware State University   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84997911012     PISSN: 08886504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08886504.1999.10782256     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aiken, E. G., Thomas, G. S., & Shennum, W. A. (1975). Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and information density. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 439-444.
2. Diederich, P. A. (1973), Short-cut statistics for teacher-made tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
3. DiVesta, F.J., & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 8-14.
4. Dyrli, O. E., & Kinnaman D. E. (1995). Moving ahead educationally with multimedia. Technology and Learning, 15(4), 37-43.
5. Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. (1973). Effect of note taking and review on recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(3), 321-325.
6. Geran, L. A. (1995). A study of the factors affecting the implementation of advanced technology in institutions of higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Widener University, Chester, PA.
7. Hartley, J., & Marshall, S. (1974). On notes and note taking. University Quarterly, 28(2), 225-235.
8. HyperStudio [Computer software]. (1991-1996). El Cajon, CA: Roger Wagner.
9. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D. (1995). Instructional media (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
10. Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Jonassen, D. H., & Wang, S. (1991, February). Conveying structured knowledge in hypertext Paper presented at the annual conference of ADCIS, San Diego, CA
12. Kearsley, G. (1988). Authoring considerations for hypertext. Educational Technology, 28(11), 21-24.
13. Kelly, A., & O'Donnell, A. (1994). Hypertext and the study strategies of preservice teachers. Jo urnal of Educational Computing Research, 10(4), 373-385.
14. Marchionini, G. (1988). Hypermedia and learning: Freedom and chaos. Educational Technology, 28(11), 8-12.
15. Nelson, W. A. (1990, March). Effects of adjunct questions on learning from hypertext. Paper presented at the annual conference of ADCIS, San Diego, CA.
16. Oosterhof, A. (1994). Classroom applications of educational measurement (2nd Ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
17. Palkovitz, R. J., & Lore, R. K. (1980). Note taking and note review: Why students fail questions based on lecture material. Teaching of Psychology, 7(3), 159-161.
18. Roselli, T. (1991). Control of user disorientation in hypertext systems. Educational Technology, 31(12), 42-46.
19. Simonson, M. R., & Thompson, A. (1997). Educational computing foundations. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20. Suritsky, S. K., & Hughes, C. A. (1991). Benefits of note taking: Implications for secondary and post-secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 14, 7-18.
21. Yang, C., & Moore, D. M. (1996). Designing hypermedia systems for instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 24(1) 3-30.
22. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. New York: Springer-Verlag