The Global City-Whose Social Construct is it Anyway?: A Comment on White

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 482-488

  Smith, Michael Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84997909608     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107808749803300403     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Appadurai, A. 1990. Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Public Culture 2 (2): 1-24.
2. Drainville, A. 1998. The fetishism of global civil society. In Transnationalism from below, edited by M. P. Smith and L. E. Guarnizo, 35-63. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
3. Friedmann, J. 1986. The world city hypothesis. Development and Change 17 (1): 69-84.
4. Friedmann, J. 1995. Where we stand: A decade of world city research. In World cities in a world system, edited by P. L. Knox and P. J. Taylor, 21-47. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
5. Guarnizo, L. E., and M. P. Smith. 1998. The locations of transnationalism. In Transnationalism from below, edited by M. P. Smith and L. E. Guarnizo, 3-34. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
6. Mander, J., and E. Smith, eds. 1996. The case against the global economy. San Francisco: Sierra Club.
7. Massey, D. 1994. Double articulation: A place in the world. In Displacements: Cultural identities in question, edited by A. Barnmer, 111-121. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
8. McMichael, P. 1996. Globalization: Myths and realities. Rural Sociology 61 (1): 25-55.
9. Sassen, S. 1991. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
10. Smith, M. P. 1994. Can you imagine? Transnational migration and the globalization of grassroots politics. Social Text 39: 15-33.
11. Smith, M. P. 1995. Looking for globality in Los Angeles. In Articulating the global and the local: Globalization and cultural studies, edited by A. Cvetkovich and D. Kellner, 55-71. Boulder, CO: Westview.