Have Families Fared Well from Welfare Reform? Educating Clinicians about Policy, Paradox, and Change

The Family Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 269-280

  Wycoff, Susan ^a   Bacod Gebhardt, Maristella ^b   Cameron, Susan ^c   Brandt, Marielle ^a   Armes, Bruce ^d  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Sacramento City College   (United States)

^c Santa Fe Indian Hospital   (United States)

^d San Juan Unified School District   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84997908405     PISSN: 10664807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/10680702010003003     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Aldous, J.(1990, December). Specification and speculation concerning the politics of workplace family policies. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 355-367.
2. Aldous, J.(1991, February). Families and inflation: Who was hurt in the last high-inflation period?. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 123-134.
3. Aldous, J., & Dumon, W. (1990, November). Family policy in the 1980's: Controversy and consensus. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1136-1151.
4. Ashford, J. B., Lecroy, C. W., & Lortie, K. L. (2001). Human behavior in the social environment: A multidimensional perspective. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
5. Axelson, J.(1998). Counseling in a multicultural society. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
6. Bane, M. J., & Ellwood, D. (1994). Welfare realities. Boston: Harvard University Press.
7. Barancik. S.(1990a). Falling through the gap: Hispanics and the growing income disparity between rich and poor. Washington, DC: Center on Budget & Policy Priorities.
8. Barancik, S.(1990b). The rural disadvantage: Growing income disparities between rural and urban areas. Washington, DC: Center on Budget & Policy Priorities.
9. Bartlett, D., & Steele, J. (1994). America: Who really pays taxes?. New York: Touchstone.
10. Blank, H.(1989, May). Public policy report—Child care and welfare reform: New opportunities for families. Young Children, 44, 28-30.
11. Blank, H.(1991, January 14). The child care and development block grant and child care grants to states under Title IV-A of the Social Security Act: A description of major provisions and issues to consider in implementation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
12. Blank, H.(1993, September). Improving childcare quality and supply: The impact of the child care and development block grant. Young Children, 48, 32-34.
13. Blank, H.(1994a). Protecting our children: State and federal policies for exempt child care settings. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14. Blank, H. (1994b). Using federal funds to improve childcare (Report No. EDO PS 94-1). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED365468).
15. Blank, H.(1996, March). The welfare reform debate: Implications for childcare. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16. Blank, H.(1997, January). Helping parents work and children succeed: A guide to childcare and the 1996 Welfare Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
17. Blankenhorn, D.(1995). Fatherless America: Confronting our most urgent social problem. Scranton, PA: HarperCollins.
18. Bos, H., Huston, A., Granger, R., Duncan, G., Brock, T., & McLoyd, V. (1999). New hope for people with low incomes: Two-year results of a program to reduce poverty and reform welfare. Milwaukee, WI: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
19. Brofenbrenner, U.(1986). Ecology of the family as a context of human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723-742.
20. Bryner, G.(1988). Politics and morality: The great American welfare debate. New York: Norton.
21. Camasso, M., Harvey, C., & Jagannathan, R. (1996, July 29). An interim report on the impact of New Jersey'sFamily Development Program. Submitted to the State of New Jersey, Department of Human Services.
22. Cameron, S. C., & Wycoff, S. M. (1998, Summer). The destructive nature of the term race: Growing beyond a false paradigm. Journal of Counseling & Development, 76, 277-293.
23. Center on Hunger and Poverty. (1997). Are states improving the lives of poor families?. Medford, MA: Tufts University.
24. Cherlin, A.(1988). The changing American family & public policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
25. Cherlin, A., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (1988, September). The changing European family: Lessons for the American reader. Journal of Family Issues, 9, 291-297.
26. Cherlin, A., & Gill, R. (1993, Winter). Nostalgia as family policy: Family breakdown as family policy. Public Interest, 110, 77-91.
27. Children'sDefense Fund. (1998, November). Welfare to what? Early findings on family hardship and well being. Washington, DC: Author.
28. Cochran, M.(1995). European childcare in global perspective. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 3, 61-72.
29. Cohen, M.(1998, March). Education and training under welfare reform. Welfare Information Network, 2(2). Available from http://www.welfareinfo.org/edissue.htm
30. Coles, R.(1986). The political life of children. Boston: Little, Brown.
31. Committee on Economic Development. (1987). Children in need: Investment strategies for the educationally disadvantaged. Washington, DC: Author.
32. Conger, R., Elder, G., Lorenz, F., Conger, K., Simons, R., Whitbeck, L., et al. (1990). Linking economic hardship to marital quality and instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 643-656.
33. Coontz, S.(1992). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.
34. Curran, D. D.(1985). Stress and the healthy family. Minneapolis, MN: Winston Press.
35. Deprez, L. S., Hastedt, C., & Henderson, M. T. (2000). Parents as scholars: A model higher education program for low-income women in the new welfare landscape. In Balancing the scales of justice, pp. 1-10. Available from http://www.mejp.org/page88mejp.html
36. The drawer people: Challenges facing hard-core jobless (Special report). (1997, November 27). The New York Times, p.A1.
37. Dumka, L., Roosa, M., & Jackson, K. (1997, May). Risk, conflict, mothers’ parenting and children'sadjustment in low-income, Mexican immigrant and Mexican-American families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 309-323.
38. Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet. New York: Russell Sage.
39. Ehrenreich, B.(1989). Fear of falling: The inner life of the middle class. New York: HarperCollins.
40. Elder, G. H., Jr.(1981, August). History and the family: The discovery of complexity. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 489-519.
41. Elder, G. H., Jr.(1985, April). Linking family hardship to children'slives. Child Development, 56, 361-375.
42. Elder, G. H., Jr.(1992, March). Families under economic pressure. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 5-37.
43. Elder, G. H., Jr.(1995, August). Inner-city parents under economic pressure: Perspectives on the strategies of parenting. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 771-784.
44. Elder, G. H., Jr., & Caspel, A. (1988). Economic stress in lives: Developmental perspectives. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 25-45.
45. Fenell, D. L., & Weinhold, B. K. (1997). Counseling families. Dever, CO: Love Publishing Company.
46. Ferrante, J.(1995). Sociology: A global perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
47. Fine, M.(1992a, October). Families in the United States: Their current status and future prospects. Family Relations, 41, 430-435.
48. Fine, M.(1992b, February). Perceived adjustments of parents and children: Variations by family structure, race & gender. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 118-127.
49. Food Research and Action Center. (1989). Feeding the other half: Mothers and children left out of WIC. District of Columbia (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED308964).
50. Food Research and Action Center. (1996). State of the states: A profile of food and nutrition programs across the nation. District of Columbia (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED4070920).
51. Gladding, S. T.(1997). Community and agency counseling. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52. Goertzel, T., & Young, G. (1996, Fall). New Jersey'sexperiment in welfare reform. The Public Interest, pp. 72-80.
53. Golden, R.(2001). Disposable children: America'schild welfare system (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
54. Greenberg, M.(1999, October 17). State spending opportunities and requirements in light of the TANF caseload decline. Presentation to the National Association of State Budget Officers, Center for Law and Social Policy.
55. Greenstein, R., & Barancik, S. (1990). Drifting apart: New findings on growing income disparities between the rich, the poor, and the middle class. Washington, DC: Center on Budget & Policy Priorities.
56. Greenstein, R., & Leonard, P. (1991). Unchanged priorities: The fiscal year 1992 Bush budget. Washington, DC: Center on Budget & Policy Priorities.
57. Greenstein, R., & Leonard, P. (1992). The fiscal year 1993 Bush budget: Still not tackling the nation'sproblems. Washington, DC: Center on Budget & Policy Priorities.
58. Grubb, W. N.(1996). Learning to work: The case for reintegrating job training and education. New York: Russell Sage.
59. Inclan, J., & Ferran, E. (1990). Poverty, politics, and family therapy: A role for systems theory. In M. Mirken (Ed.), The social and political context of family therapy. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
60. Jackson, D.(1997, July 23). The media'sskewed image. The Boston Globe, p. A17.
61. Jansson, B.(1999). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole/Wadsworth.
62. Jansson, B. S.(2000). The reluctant welfare state (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
63. Jewell, K.(1988). Survival of the Black family: The institutional impact of United States social policy. New York: Praeger. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED304494)
64. Kagan, S. L., & Weissbourd, B. (Eds.). (1994). Putting families first: America'sfamily support movement and the challenges of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
65. Kahn, A., & Kamerman, S. (1996). Children and their families in big cities: Strategies for service reform. New York: Columbia University School of Social Work, Cross-National Studies Research Program.
66. Kahn, A., & Kamerman, S. (1998). Big cities in the welfare transition (Cross-National Studies Research Program). New York: Columbia University School of Social Work, Cross-National Studies Research Program.
67. Kamerman, S., & Kahn, A. (1988, Fall). What Europe does for single-parent families. Public Interest, 93, 70-86.
68. Kamerman, S., & Kahn, A. (1995). Starting right: How America neglects its youngest children and what we can do about it. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.
69. Kamerman, S., & Kahn, A. (1996). American social policy? Report I: Confronting the new politics of child and family policy in the U.S. New York: Columbia University School of Social Work, Cross-National Studies Research Program.
70. Kamerman, S., & Kahn, A. (1997). P. L. 104-193: Challenges and opportunities: Report VI: Final report confronting the new politics of child and family policy in the U.S. New York: Columbia University School of Social Work, Cross-National Studies Research Program.
71. Kamerman, S., & Kahn, A. (1998). Privatization, contracting, and reform of child and family social services. Washington, DC.
72. Lamison-White, L.(1996). Poverty in the United States. Administration for Children and Families. Available from http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/
73. Lipset, S. M.(1991). Continental divide: The values and institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.
74. Loewen, J. L.(1995). Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history books got wrong. New York: New Press.
75. MacCluskie, K. C., & Ingersoll, R. I. (2000). Becoming a 21st century agency counselor: Personal and professional explorations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
76. McWhirter, J., McWhirter, B., McWhirter, A., & McWhirter, E. (1997). Atrisk youth: A comprehensive response (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
77. Meyer, J.(1984). Budget cuts in the Reagan administration: A question of fairness. In D. L. Bawden (Ed.), The social contract revisited (pp. 33-68). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
78. Moynihan, D.(1989a, Summer). The underclass: II. Toward a post-industrial social policy. Public Interest, 96, 16-27.
79. Moynihan, D.(1989b, Spring). Welfare reform: Serving America'schildren. Teachers College Record, 90, 337-341.
80. Moynihan, D.(1990, July/August). Families falling apart. Society, 27, 21-22.
81. Mulder, R. A.(1979). The insurgent progressives in the United States Senate and the New Deal. New York: Garland Press.
82. Nightingale, D., Tratko, J., & Barnow, B. (1999). Status of the welfare-to-work grants program after oneyear. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
83. Pankhurst, J., & Houseknecht, S. (1983, March). The family, politics and religion in the 1980's: In fear of the new individualism. Journal of Family Issues, 4, 4-34.
84. Pardeck, J.(1990, April). An analysis of the deep social structure preventing the development of a national policy for children and families in the United States. Early Childhood Development and Care, 57, 23-30.
85. Pardeck, J., & Chung, W. (1997, Summer). Explorations in a proposed national policy for children and families. Adolescence, 32, 429-436.
86. Philips, K.(1990). The politics of rich and poor: Wealth and the American electorate in the Reagan aftermath. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
87. Rector, R., & Lauber, W. (1995). America'sfailed $5.4 trillion war on poverty. Heritage Foundation.
88. Rubin, L.(1994). Families on the fault line: America'sworking class speaks about the family, the economy, race, and ethnicity. New York: Harper Perennial.
89. Scanzoni, J.(1987, December). Families in the 1980's: Time to refocus our thinking. Journal of Family Issues, 8, 394-421.
90. Scanzoni, J., & Arnett, C. (1987, October). Policy implications derived from a study of rural and urban marriages. Family Relations, 38, 30-38.
91. Scanzoni, J., & Marsiglio, W. (1993, March). New action theory and contemporary families. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 105-132.
92. Schorr, A. (1980). Thy father and thy mother: A second look at filial responsibility and family policy (Report No. SSA-13-11953). Washington, DC: Social Security Administration.
93. Schorr, A., & Moen, P. (1979, March-April). The single parent and public policy. Social Policy, 9, 15-21.
94. Sennot, C.(1996, July 7). The $150 billion “welfare” recipients: US corporations. The Boston Globe, p.A1.
95. Sklar, H.(1995). Chaos or community: Seeking solutions, not scapegoats for bad economics. Boston: South End.
96. Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1990). Generations: The history of America'sfuture. New York: Morrow.
97. Sussman, M.(1980, April). Positive family functioning. Paper presented at the Research Forum on Family Issues, National Advisory Committee of the White House Conference on Families, Washington, D.C.
98. Tanner, M.(1996). The end of welfare. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
99. Toffler, A.(1974, November). The psychology of the future. Law in American Society, 3, 17-25.
100. Tropman, J. E.(1985). The Catholic ethic in American society: An exploration of values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
101. Tropman, J. E.(1998). Does America hate the poor? The other American dilemma: Lessons for the 21st century. Westport, CT: Praeger.
102. Urban Institute. (1996). Potential effects of congressional welfare reform legislation on family incomes. Available from www.urban.org
103. U. S. Bureau of the Census. (1994). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
104. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1999). Access to childcare for low-income working families. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families.
105. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Family Assistance. (1998, August). TANF program: First annual report to Congress 1998. Washington, DC: Author.
106. U. S. General Accounting Office. (1997, May). Welfare reform: Implications of increased work participation for childcare. Washington, DC: Author.
107. Wilson, E. O.(1998). Conscience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Knopf.
108. Wilson, W. J.(1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Knopf.
109. Wisensale, S.(1992, October). Toward the 21st century: Family change and public policy. Family Relations, 41, 17-22.
110. Zellman, G. L., Klerman, J. A., Reardon, E., Farley, D., Humphrey, N., Chun, T., et al. (1996). Welfare reform in California: State and county implementation of CalWORKs in the first year. RAND Statewide CalWORKs Evaluation (MR-1051-CDSS). Available from http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1051.pdf/