Ultrasound in Diffuse Renal Disease

Ultrasound

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 30-34

  Brown, Peter ^a  

^a SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84997907235     PISSN: 1742271X     EISSN: 17431344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1742271X0301100406     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Emamian SA, Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF, Ytte L Kidney dimensions at sonography: correlation with age. sex, and habitus in 665 adult volunteers. AJR 1993; 160: 83–86.
2. Ablett MJ, Coullhard A, Lee REJ, Richardson DL, Bellas T, Owen JP, Kelr MJ, Butler TJ. How reliable are ultrasound measurements of renal length in adults? Brit J Radiol 1995; 68: 1087–1089.
3. Derchi LE, Martinoli C, Pontremali R, Pretolesi F. Role of US in medical renal diseases. 6th European Symposium on Uroradiology 1998; 22–27.
4. Roger SD, Beale AM, Cattell WR, Webb JAW, What is the value of measuring renal parenchymal thickness before renal biopsy? Clin Rad 1994; 49: 45–49.
5. Webb JAW. The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of intrinsic renal disease Clin Rad 1994; 49: 589–591.
6. Hricak H, Stovis TL, Callen CW, Callen PW, Romanski RN. Neonatal kidneys: sonographic anatomic correlation Radiology 1983; 147: 669–702.
7. Hricak H, Cruz C, Romanski RN, Uniewski MH, Levin NW, Madrazo BL, Sandler MA, Eyler WR Renal parenchy mal disease: sonograhic-histologic correlation Radiology 1982; 144: 141–147.
8. Mostbeck GH, Kain R, Mallek R. Duplex doppler sonography in renal parenchymal disease Histopathologic correlation JUM 1991; 10: 189–194.
9. Page JE, Morgan SH, Eastwood JB, Smith SA, Webb DJ, Dilly SA, Chow J, Pottier A, Joseph AEA. Ultrasound findings in renal parenchymal disease: comparison with histological appearances Clin Rad 1994; 49: 867–870.
10. Platt JF, Rubin JM, Bowerman RA, Mam CS The in ability to detect kidney disease on the basis of echogenicity. AJR 1988; 151 317–319.
11. Gubler MC, Antignac C, Broyer M. Diffuse arterial calcified elastopathy, a new cause of renovascular hypertension in children Int J Pediatr Nephrol 1985; 6: 47–54.
12. Al-Murrani B, Cosgrove DO, Svensson WE, Blaszczyk M. Echogenic rings-an ultrasound sign of early nephrocalcinosis Clin Rad 1991; 44: 49–51.
13. Domjan JM, Dewbury KC, Multiple highly reflective foci in the renal parenchyma are not specific for psuedoxanthoma elasticum Brit J Radiol 1996; 69: 871–872.
14. Walker TM, Serjeant GR. Increased renal reflectivity in sickle cell disease: prevalence and characteristies. Clin Rad 1995; 50: 566–569.
15. Toyoda K, Miyamoto Y, Ida M, Tada S, Ulsunomiya M Hyperechoic medulla of the kidneys. Radiology 1989; 173: 431–434.
16. Stillwell TJ, Gomez MR, Kelalis P. Renal lesions Tuberous Sclerosis J Urol 1987; 138: 477–481.
17. Kay CJ Renal diseases in patients with AIDS: Sonographic findings. AJR 1992; 159: 551–554.
18. Clautice-Engle T, Jeffrey RB. Renal hypoperfusion: value of power doppler imaging AJR 1997; 168: 1227–1231.
19. Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH. Acute renal failure: possible rote of duplex doppler US in distinction between acute prerenal failure and acute tubular necrosis Radiology 1991; 179: 419–423.
20. Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH. Lupus nephritis predictive value of conventional and doppler US and comparison with serologic and biopsy parameters Radiology 1997; 203: 82–86.
21. Splendiani G, Parolini C, Fortunalo L, Stumioto A, Costanzi S Resistive index in chronic nephropathies: predictive value of renal outcome. Clin Nephrol 2002; 57: 45–50.