메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 189-192

Reexamining Martinson's Critique: A Cautionary Note for Evaluators

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 84997880633     PISSN: 00111287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011128702048001008     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (4)

References (4)
  • 2
    • 84998162961 scopus 로고
    • What works?—Questions and answers about prison reform
    • Martinson, R. (1974). What works?—Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 35, 22–54.
    • (1974) Public Interest , vol.35 , pp. 22-54
    • Martinson, R.1
  • 3
    • 0001176678 scopus 로고
    • New findings, new reviews: A note of caution regarding sentencing reform
    • Martinson, R. (1979). New findings, new reviews: A note of caution regarding sentencing reform. Hofstra Law Review, 7, 243–258.
    • (1979) Hofstra Law Review , vol.7 , pp. 243-258
    • Martinson, R.1
  • 4
    • 0006181919 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of corrections-based treatments for drug abuse
    • Pearson, F. S., & Lipton, D. S. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of corrections-based treatments for drug abuse. The Prison Journal, 79(4), 384–410.
    • (1999) The Prison Journal , vol.79 , Issue.4 , pp. 384-410
    • Pearson, F.S.1    Lipton, D.S.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.