Modeling and Predicting Hearing Aid Outcome

Trends in Amplification

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 41-75

  Humes, Larry E ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84997860313     PISSN: 10847138     EISSN: 19405588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/108471380300700202     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. American National Standards Institute Specifications for audiometers, ANSI S3.6–1996. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute, 1996.
2. Arbuckle JL Wothke W. AMOS 4.0 User's Guide. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation, 1999.
3. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psych Bull 107: 238–246, 1990.
4. Bentler R Niebuhr D Getta J Anderson C. Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. II: Subjective measures. J Speech Hear Res 36: 820–831, 1993.
5. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.
6. Byrne D Parkinson A Newall P. Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. Ear Hear 11: 40–49, 1990.
7. Cox RM Alexander GC Gilmore CG Pusakulich KM. Use of the Connected Speech Test (CST) with hearing-impaired listeners. Ear Hear 9: 198–207, 1988.
8. Cox RM Gilmore C. Development of the profile of hearing aid performance (PHAP). J Speech Hear Res 33: 343–357, 1990.
9. Cox RM Alexander GC Gray G. Personality and the subjective assessment of hearing aids. J Amer Acad Audiol 10: 1–13, 1999.
10. Demorest M Erdman S. Development of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Disord 52: 129–143, 1987.
11. Dillon H James A Ginis J. The Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Amer Acad Audiol 8: 27–43, 1997.
12. Flamme GA. Examination of the validity of auditory traits and tests. Trends Amplif 5: 111–138, 2001.
13. Gatehouse S. Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Amer Acad Audiol 10: 80–103, 1999.
14. Gorsuch RL. Factor Analysis, 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.
15. Guadagnoli E Velicer WF. Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull 103: 265–275, 1988.
16. Hendrickson AE White PO. Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. Brit J Stat Psychol 17 (1): 65–70, 1964.
17. Hu L-T Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in co-variance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6: 1–55, 1999.
18. Humes LE. Dimensions of hearing aid outcome. J Amer Acad Audiol 10: 26–39, 1999.
19. Humes LE. Issues in evaluating the effectiveness of hearing aids in the elderly: What to measure and when. Seminars in Hearing 22 (3): 303–314, 2001.
20. Humes LE. Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers. J Acoust Soc Amer 112: 1112–1132, 2002.
21. Humes LE Garner CB Wilson DL Barlow NN. Hearing-aid outcome measures following one month of hearing aid use by elderly participants. J Speech Lang Hear Res 44: 469–486, 2001.
22. Humes LE Watson BU Christensen LA Cokely CG Halling DC Lee L. Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res 37: 465–474, 1994.
23. Humes LE Wilson DL Barlow NN Garner CB. Measures of hearing-aid benefit following one or two years of hearing aid use by the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res 45: 772–782, 2002(a).
24. Humes LE Wilson DL Barlow NN Garner CB Amos N. Longitudinal changes in hearing-aid satisfaction and usage in the elderly over a period of one or two years following hearing aid delivery. Ear Hear 23: 428–438, 2002(b).
25. Kaiser HF. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23 (3): 187–200, 1958.
26. Killion MC Fikret-Pasa S. The 3 types of sensorineural hearing loss: Loudness and intelligibility considerations. The Hear J 46 (11): 31–36, 1993.
27. Kochkin S. Subjective measures of satisfaction and benefit: Establishing norms. Seminars in Hearing 18 (1): 37–48, 1997.
28. Kochkin S. On the issue of value: Hearing aid benefit, price, satisfaction and brand repurchase rates. Hearing Rev 10 (2): 12–26, 2003.
29. Krantz DS Baum A Wideman MV. Assessment of preferences for self-treatment and information in health care. J Personality Soc Psychol 39: 977–990, 1980.
30. Larson VD Williams DW Henderson WG Luethke LE Beck LD et al., Efficacy of 3 commonly used hearing aid circuits: A crossover trial. JAMA 284: 1806–1813, 2000.
31. Levitt H Resnick SB. Speech reception by the hearing impaired: Methods of testing and development of materials. Scand Audiol Suppl 6: 107–129, 1978.
32. MacCallum RC Widaman KF Zhang S Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Meth 4: 84–99, 1999.
33. Mathiowetz V Weber K Kashman N Volland G. Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res 5 (1): 24–38, 1985.
34. Narendran MM Humes LE. Evaluations of judgements of sound quality in elderly hearing-aid wearers: Reliability and validity of measurements. Ear Hear (in press).
35. Thurstone LL. Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947.
36. Ventry I Weinstein B. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: A new tool. Ear Hear 3: 128–134, 1982.
37. Walden BE. Validating measures of hearing aid success. In Studebaker GA, Bess FA, eds: The Vanderbilt Hearing Aid Report. Upper Darby, Pennsylvania: Monographs in Contemporary Audiology, pp. 188–192, 1982.
38. Walden BE. Toward a model clinical-trials protocol for substantiating hearing aid user-benefit claims. Amer J Audiol 6: 13–24, 1997.
39. Walden BE Demorest ME Hepler EL. Self-report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. J Speech Hear Res 27: 49–56, 1984.
40. Wallston BS Wallston KA Kaplan GO Maides SA. Development and validation of the health locus of control (HLC) scale. J Cons Clin Psychol 44: 580–585, 1976.
41. Wechsler D. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1981.