Consequential Life Cycle Assessment of Pasture-based Milk Production: A Case Study in the Waikato Region, New Zealand

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 1139-1152

  Chobtang, Jeerasak ^a   McLaren, Sarah J ^a   Ledgard, Stewart F ^b   Donaghy, Daniel J ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b RUAKURA RESEARCH CENTRE   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

dairy; farm intensification; industrial ecology; land use; life cycle assessment (LCA); system expansion

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMERCE; DAIRIES; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FERTILIZERS; LAND USE; MEATS; NITROGEN FERTILIZERS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CONSEQUENTIAL LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; INDIRECT LAND-USE CHANGES; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); MILK PRODUCTION; PRODUCT SYSTEMS; SYSTEM EXPANSION; UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY;

LIFE CYCLE;

AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION; DAIRY FARMING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FARM; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; LAND USE; LAND USE CHANGE; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MAIZE; MEAT; MILK PRODUCTION; NITROGEN; PASTURE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SILAGE; TRADE-OFF;

NEW ZEALAND; NORTH ISLAND; WAIKATO;

ANIMALIA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84997848614     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12484     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Adrian, L., B. Gilles, G. Josette, G. Bruna, L. Luis, R. Stefan, S. David, et al. 2015. Impacts of European livestock production: Nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus and greenhouse gas emissions, land-use, water eutrophication and biodiversity. Environmental Research Letters 10(11): 115004.
2. Ahlgren, S., A. Björklund, A. Ekman, H. Karlsson, J. Berlin, P. Börjesson, T. Ekvall, G. Finnveden, M. Janssen, and I. Strid. 2015. Review of methodological choices in LCA of biorefinery systems—Key issues and recommendations. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 9(5): 606–619.
3. Basset-Mens, C., S. Ledgard, and M. Boyes. 2009. Eco-efficiency of intensification scenarios for milk production in New Zealand. Ecological Economics 68(6): 1615–1625.
4. Bouwman, L., K. K. Goldewijk, K. W. van der Hoek, A. H. Beusen, D. P. van Vuuren, J. Willems, M. C. Rufino, and E. Stehfest. 2013. Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900–2050 period. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(52): 20882–20887.
5. Brandão, M., R. Clift, A. Cowie, and S. Greenhalgh. 2014. The use of life cycle assessment in the support of robust (climate) policy making: Comment on “Using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change mitigation …”. Journal of Industrial Ecology 18(3): 461–463.
6. Bueno, C., M. Z. Hauschild, J. A. Rossignolo, A. R. Ometto, and N. C. Mendes. 2015. Sensitivity analysis of the use of life cycle impact assessment methods: A case study on building materials. Journal of Cleaner Production 112(pt 4): 2208–2220.
7. Cederberg, C. and M. Stadig. 2003. System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8(6): 350–356.
8. Cederberg, C., U. M. Persson, K. Neovius, S. Molander, and R. Clift. 2011. Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef. Environmental Science & Technology 45(5): 1773–1779.
9. Chalmers, N., M. Brander, and C. Revoredo-Giha. 2015. The implications of empirical and 1:1 substitution ratios for consequential LCA: Using a 1 % tax on whole milk as an illustrative example. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 20(9): 1268–1276.
10. Chobtang, J., S. F. Ledgard, S. J. McLaren, M. Zonderland-Thomassen, and D. J. Donaghy. 2016. Appraisal of environmental profiles of pasture-based milk production: A case study of dairy farms in the Waikato region, New Zealand. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 21(3): 311–325.
11. Clark, C. E. F., S. R. Farina, S. C. Garcia, M. R. Islam, K. L. Kerrisk, and W. J. Fulkerson. 2015. A comparison of conventional and automatic milking system pasture utilization and pre- and post-grazing pasture mass. Grass and Forage Science 71(1): 153–159.
12. Clark, D., B. Malcolm, and J. Jacobs. 2013. Dairying in the Antipodes: Recent past, near prospects. Animal Production Science 53(9): 882–893.
13. DairyNZ. 2014. New Zealand dairy statistics 2013/2014. www.dairynz.co.nz/dairystatistics. Accessed 13 June 2015.
14. DairyNZ. 2015. Common feed supplements. www.dairynz.co.nz. Accessed 21 April 2015.
15. Dalgaard, R., J. Schmidt, and A. Flysjö. 2014. Generic model for calculating carbon footprint of milk using four different life cycle assessment modelling approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production 73: 146–153.
16. Dalgaard, R., J. Schmidt, N. Halberg, P. Christensen, M. Thrane, and W. Pengue. 2008. LCA of soybean meal. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(3): 240–254.
17. De Rosa, M., M. T. Knudsen, and J. E. Hermansen. 2016. A comparison of land use change models: Challenges and future developments. Journal of Cleaner Production 113: 183–193.
18. Dumortier, J., D. J. Hayes, M. Carriquiry, F. Dong, X. Du, A. Elobeid, J. F. Fabiosa, and S. Tokgoz. 2011. Sensitivity of carbon emission estimates from indirect land-use change. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 33(3): 428–448.
19. Earles, J. M. and A. Halog. 2011. Consequential life cycle assessment: A review. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16(5): 445–453.
20. EC-JRC-IES (European Commission/Joint Research Center/Institute for Environment and Sustainability). 2012. Characterisation factors of the ILCD Recommended Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods: Database and supporting information. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
21. ecoinvent Center. 2013. ecoinvent data v3.0. www.ecoinvent.org. Accessed 12 January 2015.
22. Ekvall, T. and B. Weidema. 2004. System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9(3): 161–171.
23. European Food SCP Roundtable. 2013. ENVIFOOD Protocol, Environmental assessment of food and drink protocol. Brussels: European Food Sustainable Consumption and Production Round Table (SCP RT), Working Group 1.
24. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2015. FAOSTAT: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed 15 February 2015.
25. Finnveden, G., M. Z. Hauschild, T. Ekvall, J. Guinée, R. Heijungs, S. Hellweg, A. Koehler, D. Pennington, and S. Suh. 2009. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 91(1): 1–21.
26. Flysjö, A., C. Cederberg, M. Henriksson, and S. Ledgard. 2011. How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16(5): 420–430.
27. Flysjö, A., C. Cederberg, M. Henriksson, and S. Ledgard. 2012. The interaction between milk and beef production and emissions from land use change—Critical considerations in life cycle assessment and carbon footprint studies of milk. Journal of Cleaner Production 28: 134–142.
28. Hasler, K., S. Bröring, S. W. F. Omta, and H. W. Olfs. 2015. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of different fertilizer product types. European Journal of Agronomy 69: 41–51.
29. Hellweg, S. and L. Milà i Canals. 2014. Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science 344(6188): 1109–1113.
30. IDF (International Dairy Federation). 2010. A common carbon footprint approach for dairy: The IDF guide to standard lifecycle assessment methodology for the dairy sector. Brussels: Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation.
31. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
32. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2006a. ISO 14040: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
33. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2006b. ISO 14044: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
34. Jolliet, O., R. Frischknecht, J. Bare, A.-M. Boulay, C. Bulle, P. Fantke, S. Gheewala, et al. 2014. Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: Findings of the scoping phase. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 19(4): 962–967.
35. Kim, S., B. E. Dale, R. Heijungs, A. Azapagic, T. Darlington, and D. Kahlbaum. 2014. Indirect land use change and biofuels: Mathematical analysis reveals a fundamental flaw in the regulatory approach. Biomass and Bioenergy 71: 408–412.
36. Kløverpris, J., H. Wenzel, and P. Nielsen. 2008. Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(1): 13–21.
37. Lassaletta, L., G. Billen, B. Grizzetti, J. Garnier, A. Leach, and J. Galloway. 2014. Food and feed trade as a driver in the global nitrogen cycle: 50-year trends. Biogeochemistry 118(1–3): 225–241.
38. Ledgard, S. and M. Boyes. 2013. Temporal trends in use of supplementary feeds on farms in New Zealand: Report prepared for Ministry for Primary Industries. RE500/2013/006 PROP-30624-SLMACC-AGR. Ruakura, Hamilton: New Zealand: AgResearch Ltd.
39. Ledgard, S., R. Schils, J. Eriksen, and J. Luo. 2009. Environmental impacts of grazed clover/grass pastures. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 48(2): 209–226.
40. Ledgard, S. F., J. W. Penno, and M. S. Sprosen. 1999. Nitrogen inputs and losses from clover/grass pastures grazed by dairy cows, as affected by nitrogen fertilizer application. The Journal of Agricultural Science 132(2): 215–225.
41. Lee, J. M., C. Matthew, E. R. Thom, and D. F. Chapman. 2012. Perennial ryegrass breeding in New Zealand: A dairy industry perspective. Crop and Pasture Science 63(2): 107–127.
42. Li, F. Y., V. O. Snow, and D. P. Holzworth. 2011. Modelling the seasonal and geographical pattern of pasture production in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 54(4): 331–352.
43. MacLeod, C. J. and H. Moller. 2006. Intensification and diversification of New Zealand agriculture since 1960: An evaluation of current indicators of land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 115(1–4): 201–218.
44. MBIE (Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment). 2013. Energy in New Zealand 2013. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment.
45. McCarthy, S., C. Hirst, D. Donaghy, D. Gray, and B. Wood. 2014. Opportunities to improve grazing management. Paper presented at Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 76: 75–80.
46. Monaghan, R. M. and C. A. M. de Klein. 2014. Integration of measures to mitigate reactive nitrogen losses to the environment from grazed pastoral dairy systems. The Journal of Agricultural Science 152(Supplement s1): 45–56.
47. Morris, S. T. and P. R. Kenyon. 2014. Intensive sheep and beef production from pasture—A New Zealand perspective of concerns, opportunities and challenges. Meat Science 98(3): 330–335.
48. Myhre, G. S. D., F.-M. Bréon, W. Collins, J. Fuglestvedt, J. Huang, D. Koch, J.-F. Lamarque, et al. 2013. Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by T. F. Stocker, et al. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. Nemecek, T., J. Schnetzer, and J. Reinhard. 2014. Updated and harmonised greenhouse gas emissions for crop inventories. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-014-0712-7.
50. New Zealand Government. 2012. The business growth agenda progress reports: Building export markets. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Business, Innovation and Employment.
51. Nguyen, T. T. H., M. S. Corson, M. Doreau, M. Eugène, and H. M. G. van der Werf. 2013. Consequential LCA of switching from maize silage-based to grass-based dairy systems. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 18(8): 1470–1484.
52. O'Brien, D., L. Shalloo, J. Patton, F. Buckley, C. Grainger, and M. Wallace. 2012. A life cycle assessment of seasonal grass-based and confinement dairy farms. Agricultural Systems 107: 33–46.
53. O'Brien, D., T. Hennessy, B. Moran, and L. Shalloo. 2015. Relating the carbon footprint of milk from Irish dairy farms to economic performance. Journal of Dairy Science 98(10): 7394–7407.
54. OECD/FAO (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development/ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2013. Dairy. In OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2013. Rome: OECD Publishing.
55. Owsianiak, M., A. Laurent, A. Bjørn, and M. Z. Hauschild. 2014. IMPACT 2002+, ReCiPe 2008 and ILCD's recommended practice for characterization modelling in life cycle impact assessment: A case study-based comparison. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 19(5): 1007–1021.
56. Page, G., B. Ridoutt, and B. Bellotti. 2012. Carbon and water footprint tradeoffs in fresh tomato production. Journal of Cleaner Production 32: 219–226.
57. Panichelli, L. and E. Gnansounou. 2015. Impact of agricultural-based biofuel production on greenhouse gas emissions from land-use change: Key modelling choices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 42: 344–360.
58. Pelletier, N., R. Pirog, and R. Rasmussen. 2010. Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States. Agricultural Systems 103(6): 380–389.
59. Pelletier, N., F. Ardente, M. Brandão, C. De Camillis, and D. Pennington. 2015. Rationales for and limitations of preferred solutions for multi-functionality problems in LCA: Is increased consistency possible? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 20(1): 74–86.
60. Pinares-Patiño, C. S., G. C. Waghorn, R. S. Hegarty, and S. O. Hoskin. 2009. Effects of intensification of pastoral farming on greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57(5): 252–261.
61. Pré Consultants. 2013. SimaPro 8.0 life cycle assessment software. Amersfoort, the Netherlands: Pré Consultants.
62. Reinhard, J. and R. Zah. 2011. Consequential life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of an increased rapemethylester (RME) production in Switzerland. Biomass and Bioenergy 35(6): 2361–2373.
63. Ridoutt, B. G., P. Sanguansri, and G. S. Harper. 2011. Comparing carbon and water footprints for beef cattle production in Southern Australia. Sustainability 3(12): 2443–2455.
64. Schmidt, J. H. 2015. Life cycle assessment of five vegetable oils. Journal of Cleaner Production 87: 130–138.
65. Schmidt, J. H., B. P. Weidema, and M. Brandão. 2015. A framework for modelling indirect land use changes in life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 99: 230–238.
66. Selbie, D. R., L. E. Buckthought, and M. A. Shepherd. 2015. Chapter four—The challenge of the urine patch for managing nitrogen in grazed pasture systems. In Advances in agronomy, edited by D. L. Sparks. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; London, UK: Academic Press.
67. Sinclair, A. G., D. C. Edmeades, and S. F. Ledgard. 1993. The influence of phosphorus, sulphur and nitrogen fertilisers on acidification in pastoral soils. Paper presented at Proceedings of the New Zealand Fertiliser Manufacturers’ Research Association Conference, 106–117.
68. StatisticsNZ. 2014. Energy use survey—Information releases (New Zealand energy use: Primary industries 2008). Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand.
69. StatisticsNZ. 2015. Infoshare. www.stats.govt.nz/infoshare/. Accessed 14 March 2015.
70. Thiesen, J., T. Christensen, T. Kristensen, R. Andersen, B. Brunoe, T. Gregersen, M. Thrane, and B. Weidema. 2008. Rebound effects of price differences. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(2): 104–114.
71. Thomassen, M., R. Dalgaard, R. Heijungs, and I. Boer. 2008. Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(4): 339–349.
72. Tilman, D., C. Balzer, J. Hill, and B. L. Befort. 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(50): 20260–20264.
73. Tonini, D., L. Hamelin, and T. F. Astrup. 2016. Environmental implications of the use of agro-industrial residues for biorefineries: Application of a deterministic model for indirect land-use changes. GCB Bioenergy 8: 690–706.
74. Treyer, K. and C. Bauer. 2014. Life cycle inventories of electricity generation and power supply in version 3 of the ecoinvent database—Part II: Electricity markets. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-013-0694-x.
75. Vogeler, I. and R. Cichota. 2015. Deriving seasonally optimal nitrogen fertilization rates for a ryegrass pasture based on agricultural production systems simulator modelling with a refined AgPasture model. Grass and Forage Science. DOI: 10.1111/gfs.12181.
76. Wales, W. J., E. S. Kolver, A. R. Egan, and R. Roche. 2009. Effects of strain of Holstein-Friesian and concentrate supplementation on the fatty acid composition of milk fat of dairy cows grazing pasture in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 92(1): 247–255.
77. Warner, E., Y. Zhang, D. Inman, and G. Heath. 2014. Challenges in the estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from biofuel-induced global land-use change. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 8(1): 114–125.
78. Weidema, B. P. 2003. Market information in life cycle assessment. Copenhagen: Danish Environmental Protection Agency.
79. Weidema, B. P. and J. H. Schmidt. 2010. Avoiding allocation in life cycle assessment revisited. Journal of Industrial Ecology 14(2): 192–195.
80. Weidema, B. P., T. Ekvall, and R. Heijungs. 2009. Guidelines for application of deepened and broadened LCA: Deliverable D18 of work package 5 of the CALCAS project. Rome: ENEA.
81. Yang, Y. 2013. Life cycle freshwater ecotoxicity, human health cancer, and noncancer impacts of corn ethanol and gasoline in the U.S. Journal of Cleaner Production 53: 149–157.