Combining socioeconomic development with environmental governance in the Brazilian Amazon: the Mato Grosso agricultural frontier at a tipping point

Environment, Development and Sustainability

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Arvor, Damien ^a   Daugeard, Marion ^b,c   Tritsch, Isabelle ^b   De Mello Thery, Neli Aparecida ^d   Thery, Hervé ^b   Dubreuil, Vincent ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ RENNES 2   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ SORBONNE NOUVELLE PARIS 3   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Agricultural frontier; Brazilian Amazon; Environmental governance; Mato Grosso; Public policies

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; AGRICULTURAL MODELING; AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; AGROINDUSTRY; DEFORESTATION; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL POLICY; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS;

AMAZONIA; BRAZIL; MATO GROSSO;

EID: 84997706212     PISSN: 1387585X     EISSN: 15732975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-016-9889-1     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. ABIOVE. (2016). Moratoria da soja. Safra 2015/2016. (31 pp) http://www.abiove.org.br/site/_FILES/Portugues/09112016-141009-relatorio_da_moratoria_da_soja_2015-16_gts.pdf.
2. Anderson, A. B. (1990). Smokestacks in the rainforest: Industrial development and deforestation in the Amazon basin. World Development, 18(9), 1191–1205. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(90)90025-S.
3. APROSOJA. (2016). Soja Plus. Associação dos Produtores de Soja do Mato grosso http://www.aprosoja.com.br/aprosoja/projeto/soja-plus.
4. Arima, E. Y., Richards, P., Walker, R., & Caldas, M. M. (2011). Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters, 6(2), 024010. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024010.
5. Arvor, D., Dubreuil, V., Mendez, P., Ferreira, C. M., & Meirelles, M. (2009). Développement, crises et adaptation des territoires du soja au Mato Grosso: l’exemple de Sorriso. Confins. doi:10.4000/confins.5934.
6. Arvor, D., Dubreuil, V., Simões, M., & Bégué, A. (2012a). Mapping and spatial analysis of the soybean agricultural frontier in Mato Grosso, Brazil, using remote sensing data. GeoJournal, 78, 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10708-012-9469-3.
7. Arvor, D., Meirelles, M., Dubreuil, V., Bégué, A., & Shimabukuro, Y. E. (2012b). Analyzing the agricultural transition in Mato Grosso, Brazil, using satellite-derived indices. Applied Geography, 32(2), 702–713. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.007.
8. Assunção, J., Gandour, C., Rocha, R. (2012). Deforestation slowdown in the legal Amazon: Prices or Policies? Climate Policy Initiative
9. Assunção, J., Gandour, C., Rocha, R., Rocha, R. (2013). Does credit affect deforestation? Evidence from a Rural Credit Policy in the Brazilian Amazon (50 pp). https://climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Does-Credit-Affect-Deforestation-Evidence-from-a-Rural-Credit-Policy-in-the-Brazilian-Amazon-Technical-Paper-English.pdf.
10. Assunção, J., & Rocha, R. (2014). Municípios Prioritários: Reputação ou Fiscalização? (7 pp) http://climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Munic%C3%ADpios-Priorit%C3%A1rios-Reputa%C3%A7%C3%A3o-ou-Fiscaliza%C3%A7%C3%A3o_-Sum%C3%A1rio-Executivo.pdf
11. Aubertin, C. (2013). Le Brésil au prisme des MBI. Invaluable, 29 pp.
12. Azevedo, A. A., & Saito, C. H. (2013). O perfil dos desmatamentos em Mato Grosso, após implementação do licenciamento ambiental em propriedades rurais. CERNE, 19(1), 111–122. doi:10.1590/S0104-77602013000100014.
13. Azevedo, A. A., Stabile, M. C. C., & Reis, T. N. P. (2015). Commodity production in Brazil: Combining zero deforestation and zero illegality. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. doi:10.12952/journal.elementa.000076.
14. Banerjee, O., Macpherson, A. J., & Alavalapati, J. (2009). Toward a policy of sustainable forest management in Brazil: A historical analysis. The Journal of Environment & Development, 18(2), 130–153. doi:10.1177/1070496509333567.
15. Barbier, E. B., Burgess, J. C., & Grainger, A. (2010). The forest transition: Towards a more comprehensive theoretical framework. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 98–107. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.001.
16. Barlow, J., Gardner, T. A., Lees, A. C., Parry, L., & Peres, C. A. (2012). How pristine are tropical forests? An ecological perspective on the pre-Columbian human footprint in Amazonia and implications for contemporary conservation. Biological Conservation, 151(1), 45–49. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.013.
17. Barreto, P., Mesquita, M., Araújo, E., & Brito, B. (2009). A Impunidade de Infratores Ambientais em Áreas Protegidas da Amazônia. IMAZON http://www.imazon.org.br/publicacoes/o-estado-da-amazonia/a-impunidade-de-infratores-ambientais-em-areas. Accessed 3 Jan 2012
18. Becker, B. (1986). Signification actuelle de la frontière: une interprétation géopolitique à partir du cas de l’Amazonie brésilienne. Cahiers des sciences humaines, 22, 297–317.
19. Bertrand, J.-P. (2004). L’avancée fulgurante du complexe soja dans le Mato Grosso: facteurs clés et limites prévisibles. Tiers-Monde, 45(179), 567–594.
20. Binswanger, H. P. (1991). Brazilian policies that encourage deforestation in the Amazon. World Development, 19(7), 821–829. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(91)90135-5.
21. Bruner, A. G. (2001). Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science, 291(5501), 125–128. doi:10.1126/science.291.5501.125.
22. Cassman, K. G. (1999). Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(11), 5952–5959. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.11.5952.
23. Davidson, E. A., de Araújo, A. C., Artaxo, P., Balch, J. K., Brown, I. F., Bustamante, M. M., et al. (2012). The Amazon basin in transition. Nature, 481(7381), 321–328. doi:10.1038/nature10717.
24. de Almeida, C. A., Coutinho, A. C., Esquerdo, J. C. D. M., Adami, M., Venturieri, A., Diniz, C. G., et al. (2016). High spatial resolution land use and land cover mapping of the Brazilian Legal Amazon in 2008 using Landsat-5/TM and MODIS data. Acta Amazonica, 46(3), 291–302. doi:10.1590/1809-4392201505504.
25. de Mello, N. A. (2008). E a política agrícola transforma-se em instrumento do desenvolvimento sustentavel. Revista NERA, 12, 20–40.
26. DeFries, R. S., Foley, J. A., & Asner, G. P. (2004). Land-use choices: Balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(5), 249–257. doi:10.1890/1540-9295%282004%29002[0249:LCBHNA]2.0.CO;2/abstract.
27. DeFries, R., & Rosenzweig, C. (2010). Toward a whole-landscape approach for sustainable land use in the tropics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(46), 19627–19632. doi:10.1073/pnas.1011163107.
28. Droulers, M. (1995). L’Amazonie (Nathan-Université.). Paris
29. Droulers, M. (2001). Brésil: une géohistoire (Presses universitaires de France.). Paris
30. Droulers, M., & Le Tourneau, F.-M. (2000). Amazonie: la fin d’une frontière? Caravelle, 1988(75), 109–135.
31. Drummond, J., & Barros-Platiau, A. F. (2006). Brazilian Environmental Laws and Policies, 1934–2002: A Critical Overview. Law & Policy, 28(1), 83–108. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2005.00218.x.
32. Dubreuil, V., Laques, A.-E., Nédélec, V., Arvor, D., & Gurgel, H. (2008). Paysages et fronts pionniers amazoniens sous le regard des satellites: l’exemple du Mato Grosso. Espace Géographique, 37, 57–74.
33. Elferink, E. V., Nonhebel, S., & Schoot Uiterkamp, A. J. M. (2007). Does the Amazon suffer from BSE prevention? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 120(2–4), 467–469. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.09.009.
34. FAO. (2015). Conservation agriculture http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/
35. Fearnside, P. M. (2001). Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil. Environmental Conservation, 28(1), 23–38. doi:10.1017/S0376892901000030.
36. Fearnside, P. M. (2016). Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydroelectric Dams in Brazilian Amazonia: Implications for the Aluminum Industry. World Development, 77, 48–65. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.015.
37. Fearnside, P. M., Figueiredo, A. M. R., & Bonjour, S. C. M. (2013). Amazonian forest loss and the long reach of China’s influence. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15(2), 325–338. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9412-2.
38. Foley, J. A. (2005). Global Consequences of Land Use. Science, 309(5734), 570–574. doi:10.1126/science.1111772.
39. FUNAI. (2014). Fundação Nacional do Indio. www.funai.gov.br.
40. Galford, G. L., Soares-Filho, B., & Cerri, C. E. P. (2013). Prospects for land-use sustainability on the agricultural frontier of the Brazilian Amazon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1619), 20120171. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0171.
41. Gasparri, N. I., Kuemmerle, T., Meyfroidt, P., de Waroux, Y. L. P., & Kreft, H. (2016). The emerging soybean production frontier in Southern Africa: Conservation challenges and the role of south–south telecouplings. Conservation Letters, 9(1), 21–31. doi:10.1111/conl.12173.
42. Gibbs, H. K., Munger, J., L’Roe, J., Barreto, P., Pereira, R., Christie, M., et al. (2016). Did ranchers and slaughterhouses respond to zero-deforestation agreements in the Brazilian Amazon?: Brazil’s zero-deforestation pacts. Conservation Letters, 9(1), 32–42. doi:10.1111/conl.12175.
43. Gibbs, H. K., Rausch, L., Munger, J., Schelly, I., Morton, D. C., Noojipady, P., et al. (2015). Brazil’s soy moratorium. Science, 347(6220), 377–378. doi:10.1126/science.aaa0181.
44. Gil, J., Siebold, M., & Berger, T. (2015). Adoption and development of integrated crop–livestock–forestry systems in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 199, 394–406. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.008.
45. Gollnow, F., & Lakes, T. (2014). Policy change, land use, and agriculture: The case of soy production and cattle ranching in Brazil, 2001–2012. Applied Geography, 55, 203–211. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.003.
46. Greenpeace. (2006). Eating up the Amazon (64 pp). http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/planet-2/report/2006/7/eating-up-the-amazon.pdf.
47. GTPS. (2012). Brazilian Roundtable on Sustainable Livestock. Brasilia.http://www.livestockdialogue.org/fileadmin/templates/res_livestock/docs/workshop/2012_07_May_Brasilia/GTPS_Fernando_Sampaio.pdf.
48. Heckenberger, M. J. (2003). Amazonia 1492: pristine forest or cultural parkland? Science, 301(5640), 1710–1714. doi:10.1126/science.1086112.
49. IBGE. (2016). Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/. Accessed 15 Dec 2014.
50. INPE. (2016). Projeto PRODES http://www.obt.inpe.br/prodes/prodes_1988_2014.htm. Accessed 15 Dec 2014.
51. Jepson, W. (2006). Private agricultural colonization on a Brazilian frontier, 1970–1980. Journal of Historical Geography, 32(4), 839–863. doi:10.1016/j.jhg.2004.12.019.
52. Jepson, W., Brannstrom, C., & Stancato de Souza, R. (2005). A case of contested ecological modernisation: The governance of genetically modified crops in Brazil. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(2), 295–310.
53. Lambin, E. F., & Meyfroidt, P. (2010). Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 108–118. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.003.
54. Landers, J. (2001). How and why the Brazilian zero tillage explosion occurred. In Sustaining the Global Farm. Selected papers from the 10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting held May 24e29, 1999 at Purdue University and the USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory (pp. 29–39). [s.l]: Stott, D.E., Mohtar, R.H., Steinhardt, G.C
55. Laurance, W. F., Cochrane, M. A., Bergen, S., Fearnside, P. F., Delamônica, P., Barber, C., et al. (2001). The future of the Brazilian Amazon. Science, 291(5503), 438–439. doi:10.1126/science.291.5503.438.
56. Le Tourneau, F.-M. (2015). Le Brésil maîtrise-t-il (enfin) la déforestation en Amazonie? Cybergeo. doi:10.4000/cybergeo.27325.
57. Le Tourneau, F.-M., Marchand, G., Greissing, A., Nasuti, S., Droulers, M., Bursztyn, M., et al. (2013). Assessing the impacts of sustainable development projects in the Amazon: The DURAMAZ experiment. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 199–212. doi:10.1007/s11625-013-0200-1.
58. Léna, P. (1986). Aspects de la frontière amazonienne. Cahiers des sciences humaines, 22, 319–343.
59. Macedo, M. N., DeFries, R. S., Morton, D. C., Stickler, C. M., Galford, G. L., & Shimabukuro, Y. E. (2012). Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(4), 1341–1346. doi:10.1073/pnas.1111374109.
60. Mahar, D. J. (1990). Policies affecting land use in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy, 7(1), 59–69. doi:10.1016/0264-8377(90)90055-4.
61. MAPA. (2016). AGROSTAT - Estatisticas de Comércio Exterior do Agronegócio Brasileiro. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuaria e Abastecimento http://indicadores.agricultura.gov.br/agrostat/index.htm
62. Marcuzzo, S. F. (2015). Programa Novo Campo: Estratégia de pecuária sustentável na Amazônia. Alta Floresta-MT: ICV http://www.icv.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Estrategia_pecuaria_sustentavel_amazonia_ICV.pdf.
63. Mather, A. S., & Needle, C. L. (1998). The forest transition: a theoretical basis. Area, 30(2), 117–124. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.1998.tb00055.x.
64. Matson, P. A. (1997). Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science, 277(5325), 504–509. doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.504.
65. MMA. (2015). Ministerio do Meio Ambiente http://www.mma.gov.br/biomas.
66. Monbeig, P. (1952). Pionniers et planteurs de São Paulo. Paris: A. Colin.
67. Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Shimabukuro, Y. E., Anderson, L. O., Arai, E., del Bon Espirito-Santo, F., et al. (2006). Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(39), 14637–14641. doi:10.1073/pnas.0606377103.
68. Nédélec, V. (2005). Modélisation de la colonisation agricole et de la déforestation dans le nord du Mato Grosso: approche multiscalaire par télédétection (PhD) (pp. 294). University Rennes 2–University of Brasilia
69. Nepstad, D., McGrath, D., Stickler, C., Alencar, A., Azevedo, A., Swette, B., et al. (2014). Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science, 344(6188), 1118–1123. doi:10.1126/science.1248525.
70. Perz, S. G., Aramburú, C., & Bremner, J. (2005). Population, land use and deforestation in the pan Amazon basin: a comparison of Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Perú and Venezuela. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7(1), 23–49. doi:10.1007/s10668-003-6977-9.
71. Richards, P., Arima, E., VanWey, L., Cohn, A., & Bhattarai, N. (2016). Are Brazil’s deforesters avoiding detection?: Are deforesters avoiding detection? Conservation Letters. doi:10.1111/conl.12310.
72. Richards, P. D., Myers, R. J., Swinton, S. M., & Walker, R. T. (2012). Exchange rates, soybean supply response, and deforestation in South America. Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 454–462. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.004.
73. Rodrigues-Filho, S., Verburg, R., Bursztyn, M., Lindoso, D., Debortoli, N., & Vilhena, A. M. G. (2015). Election-driven weakening of deforestation control in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy, 43, 111–118. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.002.
74. Roriz, P. A. C., & Fearnside, P. M. (2015). A construção do Código Florestal Brasileiro e as diferentes perspectivas para a proteção das florestas. Novos Cadernos NAEA. doi:10.5801/ncn.v18i2.1866.
75. RTRS. (2016). Round Table For Sustainable Soy http://www.responsiblesoy.org/about-rtrs/history
76. Rudel, T. K., Schneider, L., & Uriarte, M. (2010). Forest transitions: An introduction. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 95–97. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.021.
77. Rudorff, B. F. T., Adami, M., Aguiar, D. A., Moreira, M. A., Mello, M. P., Fabiani, L., et al. (2011). The soy moratorium in the Amazon biome monitored by remote sensing images. Remote Sensing, 3(12), 185–202. doi:10.3390/rs3010185.
78. Salomon, M. M. R. (2016). O novo Código Florestal e a regularização do passivo ambiental dos imóveis rurais: o caso de Querência. Universidade de Brasilia, Brasilia. Retrieved from http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/21112
79. Scopel, E., Douzet, J.-M., Macena Da Silva, F. A., Cardoso, A., Alves Moreira, J. A., Findeling, A., et al. (2005). Impacts des systèmes de culture en semis direct avec couverture végétale (SCV) sur la dynamique de l’eau, de l’azote minéral et du carbone du sol dans les Cerrados brésiliens. Cahiers Agricultures, 14(1), 71–75.
80. SFB. (2016). Serviço Florestal Brasileiro. Números de cadastro ambiental. http://www.florestal.gov.br/cadastro-ambiental-rural/numeros-do-cadastro-ambiental-rural.
81. Siqueira, E. M. (2002). História de Mato Grosso: da ancestralidade aos dias atuais (Entrelinhas.). Cuiaba
82. Soares-Filho, B., Rajao, R., Macedo, M., Carneiro, A., Costa, W., Coe, M., et al. (2014). Cracking Brazil’s forest code. Science, 344(6182), 363–364. doi:10.1126/science.1246663.
83. Stickler, C. M., Nepstad, D. C., Azevedo, A. A., & McGrath, D. G. (2013). Defending public interests in private lands: compliance, costs and potential environmental consequences of the Brazilian Forest Code in Mato Grosso. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1619), 20120160. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0160.
84. Summers, P. (2008). The Post-frontier: Land use and social change in the Brazilian Amazon (1992–2002) (PhD) (pp. 249). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
85. Telles do Vale. (2016). Reflorestar um pouco do Brasil: um objetivo utópico? In Restauração de paisagens e florestas no Brasil (IUCN Portals., pp. 86–135). Brasilia https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2016-025.pdf
86. Théry, H. (2005). Le Brésil. Paris: Armand Collin.
87. Théry, H. (2006). Franges pionnières d’hier et d’aujourd’hui. In Amérique Latine (La Documentation Française., pp. 113–123). Paris: Zagefka P
88. Tilman, D. (1999). Colloquium Paper: Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: The need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(11), 5995–6000. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995.
89. Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418(6898), 671–677. doi:10.1038/nature01014.
90. TNC. (2011). Agronegócio e sustentabilidade: Lucas do Rio Verde Legal http://www.tnc.org.br/tnc-no-mundo/americas/brasil/projetos/lucas-do-rio-verde.xml
91. Tollefson, J. (2012). Brazil set to cut forest protection. Nature, 485(7396), 19. doi:10.1038/485019a.
92. Tritsch, I., & Arvor, D. (2016). Transition in environmental governance in the Brazilian Amazon: Emergence of a new pattern of socio-economic development and deforestation. Land Use Policy, 59, 446–455. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.018.
93. Tritsch, I., & Le Tourneau, F.-M. (2016). Population densities and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: New insights on the current human settlement patterns. Applied Geography, 76, 163–172. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.022.
94. Turner, F. J. (1893). The Frontier in American History http://xroads.virginia.edu/HYPER/TURNER/. Accessed 3 Jan 2012
95. Valdes, C. (2006). Brazil’s booming agriculture faces obstacles. Amber Waves, 6, 28–35.
96. Willis, K. J. (2004). How “virgin” is virgin rainforest? Science, 304(5669), 402–403. doi:10.1126/science.1093991.