“Nothing about us without us”: The ideals and realities of participatory action research with people with an intellectual disability

Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 56-70

  Johnson, Kelley ^a   Strong, Ria ^a   Harrison, Lyn ^a   Hiller, Lynne ^b  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84997549710     PISSN: 15017419     EISSN: 17453011     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15017410109510776     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Alder C, Sandor D (1990). Youth researching youth. Youth Studies 9: 4: 38-42.
2. Barnes C (1996). Disability and the myth of the independent researcher. Disability and Society 11: 1: 107-111.
3. Barton L (1998). Developing an emancipatory research agenda: possibilities and dilemmas. In: Clough P, Barton L, ed. Articulating with Difficulty: Research Voices in Inclusive Education, London, Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd. Clough P, Barton L, ed. Articulating with Difficulty: Research Voices in Inclusive Education, London, Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
4. Fals Borda A (2000) Participatory action research and real life processes: beyond the ritual of analysis. Faculty of Education seminar series, September 19th, Geelong, Deakin University.
5. Foster M (1972). An introduction to the theory and practice of action research in work organizations. Human Relations 25: 6: 529-556.
6. Goodson IF (1997). Action research and 'the reflexive project of selves'. In: Hollingsworth S, ed. International Action Research: A Casebook for Educational Reform. London, The Falmer Press.
7. Grundy S, Kemmis S (1981). Educational action research in Australia: the state of the art (an overview). Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. November 1981, Adelaide.
8. Hall BL (1979). Knowledge as a commodity and participatory research. Prospects 9: 4: 393-408.
9. Hollingsworth S, Dadds M, Miller J (1997). The examined experience of action research: the person within the process. In: Hollingsworth S, ed. International Action Research: A Casebook for Educational Reform. London, The Falmer Press.
10. Johnson K (1998). Deinstitutionalising Women. An Ethnographic Study of Institutional Closure Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
11. Kaplan SJ, Alsup R (1995). Participatory action research: a creative response to AIDS prevention in diverse communities. Convergence 28:1: 38-55.
12. Kitchen R (2000). The researched opinions on research: disabled people and disability research. Disability and Society 15: 1: 25-49.
13. McCarthy (1999). Sexuality and Women with Learning Disabilities. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
14. McCarthy (2000). Consent and choices: women with intellectual disabilities and sexuality. In R. Traustadottir and K. Johnson (Eds). Women with Intellectual Disabilities. Finding a Place in the World. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
15. McTaggart R (1997). Guiding principles for participatory action research. In: McTaggart R, ed. Participatory Action Research: International Contexts and Consequences. Albany, State University of New York Press.
16. Rahman MA (2000). Globalization and people's empowerment. Keynote Address at the Fourth International Workshop on the Evaluation of Social Development. 3-7 April, Oxford.
17. Rioux M, Richler D (1995). Count us in: lessons from Canada on strategies for social change. In: Philpot T, Ward L, ed. Values and Visions: changing Ideas in Services for People with Learning Difficulties. Oxford, Butterworth Heinemann Ltd.
18. Shakespeare T (1996). Rules of engagement: doing disability research. Disability and Society 11:1: 115-121.
19. Tandon R (1988). Social transformation and participatory research. Convergence 21: 2/3: 5-14.