Assessment of land use and land cover change using spatiotemporal analysis of landscape: case study in south of Tehran

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 188, Issue 12, 2016, Pages

  Sabr, Abutaleb ^a   Moeinaddini, Mazaher ^a   Azarnivand, Hossein ^a   Guinot, Benjamin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b LABORATOIRE D AÉROLOGIE   (France)

Author keywords

Environmental impacts; GIS; Landscape fragmentation; LUCC; Remote sensing; Tehran

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; AIR QUALITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LAND USE; PIXELS; REMOTE SENSING; STORMS;

ACCURACY OF CLASSIFICATIONS; LAND USE AND LAND COVER CHANGE; LANDSCAPE FRAGMENTATION; LUCC; OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATIONS; OBJECT-BASED IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; PIXEL BASED CLASSIFICATIONS; TEHRAN;

IMAGE CLASSIFICATION;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FRAGMENTATION; GIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; REMOTE SENSING; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; CLASSIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LANDSCAPE; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA; AGRICULTURE; CITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; IRAN; PROCEDURES; TRENDS;

IRAN; TEHRAN [IRAN]; TEHRAN [TEHRAN (PRV)];

AGRICULTURE; CITIES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; IRAN; SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84997523716     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5701-9     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anderson, J., Hardy, E., Roach, J., & Witmer, R. (1976). A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data [USA]. Professional Papers-US Geological Survey (USA)., 964, 1–41.
2. Baatz, M., Benz, U., Dehghani, S., Heynen, M., Höltje, A., Hofmann, P., et al. (2004). eCognition professional user guide 4. Munich: Definiens Imaging.
3. Barau, A. S., & Qureshi, S. (2015). Using agent-based modelling and landscape metrics to assess landscape fragmentation in Iskandar Malaysia. Ecological Processes, 4(1), 1–11.
4. Blaschke, T. (2010). Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(1), 2–16.
5. Botequilha Leitão, A., & Ahern, J. (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 65–93.
6. Chouvardas, D., & Vrahnakis, M. (2009). A semi-empirical model for the near future evolution of the Lake Koronia landscape. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 10, 867–886.
7. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychosocial Measurement, 20, 37–46.
8. Congalton, R. G. (1991). A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37(1), 35–46.
9. Corry, R. C., & Nassauer, J. I. (2005). Limitations of using landscape pattern indices to evaluate the ecological consequences of alternative plans and designs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 72, 265–280.
10. Dingle Robertson, L., & King, D. J. (2011). Comparison of pixel- and object-based classification in land cover change mapping. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(6), 1505–1529.
11. Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) (2014). Center, h. e. u. g., Accesed 14 Oct 2014.
12. Elkhrachy, I., (2015). Land use change detection using satellite images for Najran city. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).
13. Foody, G. M. (2002). Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(1), 185–201.
14. Fortier, J., Rogan, J., Woodcock, C. E., & Runfola, D. M. (2011). Utilizing temporally invariant calibration sites to classify multiple dates and types of satellite imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 77(2), 181–189.
15. Gilmore, S., Saleem, A., & Dewan, A., (2015). Effectiveness of DOS (dark-object subtraction) method and water index techniques to map wetlands in a rapidly urbanizing megacity with Landsat 8 data. In Proceedings of the research@ locate in conjunction with the annual conference on spatial information in Australia and New Zealand, Brisbane, QLD, Australia (pp. 10–12).
16. Gómez, C., White, J. C., & Wulder, M. A. (2016). Optical remotely sensed time series data for land cover classification: a review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 116, 55–72.
17. Goosem, M. (2007). Fragmentation impacts caused by roads through rainforests. Current Science, 93(11), 1587–1595.
18. Hargis, C. D., Bissonette, J. A., & David, J. L. (1998). The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology, 13, 167–186.
19. Im, J., Jensen, J., & Tullis, J. (2008). Object-based change detection using correlation image analysis and image segmentation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(2), 399–423.
20. Iqbal, M. F., & Khan, I. A. (2014). Spatiotemporal land use land cover change analysis and erosion risk mapping of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 17(2), 209–229.
21. Jahani, H. R., & Reyhani, M., (2006). Role of groundwater in Tehran water crisis mitigation. International workshop on groundwater for emergency situations. tehran: regional center on urban water management/UNESCO-IHP, 6.
22. Janssen, L. L., & Vanderwel, F. J., (1994). Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data: a review. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing;(United States), 60(4).
23. Jawak, S. D., Devliyal, P., & Luis, A. J. (2015). A comprehensive review on pixel oriented and object oriented methods for information extraction from remotely sensed satellite images with a special emphasis on cryospheric applications. Advances in Remote Sensing, 4(03), 177.
24. Johnson, B. (2015). Remote sensing image fusion at the segment level using a spatially-weighted approach: applications for land cover spectral analysis and mapping. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(1), 172–184.
25. Kabba, V. T. S., & Li, J. (2011). Analysis of land use and land cover changes, and their ecological implications in Wuhan, China. Journal of Geography and Geology, 3, 104–118.
26. Karakus, P., & Karabork, H., (2016). Effect of pansharpened image on some of pixel based and object based classification accuracy. ISPRS-International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, 235–239.
27. Karami, A., Khoorani, A., Noohegar, A., Shamsi, S. R. F., & Moosavi, V. (2015). Gully erosion mapping using object-based and pixel-based image classification methods. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 21(2), 101–110.
28. Kim, S. R., Lee, W. K., Kwak, D. A., Biging, G. S., Gong, P., Lee, J. H., et al. (2011). Forest cover classification by optimal segmentation of high resolution satellite imagery. Sensors, 11(2), 1943–1958.
29. Kizos, T., Dalaka, A., & Petanidou, T. (2010). Farmers’ attitudes and landscape change: evidence from the abandonment of terraced cultivations on Lesvos, Greece. Agriculture and Human Values, 27, 199–212.
30. Lambin, E. F., & Veldkamp, A. (2001). Predicting land-use change. Agricultural Ecosystem & Environment, 85(1), 1–6.
31. Liang, J., Liu, Y., Ying, L., Li, P., Xu, Y., & Shen, Z. (2014). Road impacts on spatial patterns of land use and landscape fragmentation in three parallel rivers region, Yunnan Province, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 24(1), 15–27.
32. Li, B. B., Jansson, U., Ye, Y., & Widgren, M. (2013). The spatial and temporal change of cropland in the Scandinavian peninsula during 1875–1999. Regional Environmental Change, 13, 1325–1336.
33. Lu, D., Hetrick, S., & Moran, E. (2010). Land cover classification in a complex urban-rural landscape with QuickBird imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 76(10), 1159–1168.
34. Lu, D., Li, G., Moran, E., & Hetrick, S. (2013). Spatiotemporal analysis of land-use and land-cover change in the Brazilian Amazon. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(16), 5953–5978.
35. Matinfar, H., Sarmadian, F., Alavi Panah, S., & Heck, R. (2007). Comparisons of object-oriented and pixel-based classification of land use/land cover types based on Lansadsat7, Etm + spectral bands (case study: arid region of Iran). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 2(4), 448–456.
36. McGarigal, K., (2001). Landscape metrics for categorical map patterns 1–77.
37. McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A., Neel, M. C., & Ene, E., (2002). FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps.
38. McGarigal, K., & Marks, B. (2014). FRAGSTATS HELP.
39. McGarigal, K., & Marks, B. J. (1995). Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
40. Mitchell, M. G., Suarez-Castro, A. F., Martinez-Harms, M., Maron, M., McAlpine, C., Gaston, K. J., et al. (2015). Reframing landscape fragmentation’s effects on ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(4), 190–198.
41. Mohamed, N., & Mobarak, B. (2016). Change detection techniques using optical remote sensing: a survey. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 17(1), 42–51.
42. Motiee, H., Monouchehri, G., & Tabatabai, M. (2001). Water crisis in Iran, codification and strategies in urban water. In Proceedings of the workshops held at the UNESCO symposium, technical documents in hydrology No. 45, Marseille, 2001 (pp. 55–62)
43. Newman, M. E., McLaren, K. P., & Wilson, B. S. (2011). Comparing the effects of classification techniques on landscape-level assessments: pixel-based versus object-based classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(14), 4055–4073.
44. Rawat, J., Biswas, V., & Kumar, M. (2013). Changes in land use/cover using geospatial techniques: a case study of Ramnagar town area, district Nainital, Uttarakhand, India. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 16(1), 111–117.
45. Riitters, K., Wickham, J., & Coulston, J. (2004). Use of road maps in national assessments of forest fragmentation in the United States. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 13.
46. Saeifar, M. H., & Mohammadnia, M. (2015). Land use/land cover change detection in Tehran city using Landsat satellite images. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 5(12), 199–207.
47. Saemian, S. (2013). Adaptation strategies to impacts of climate change and variability on tehran water supply in 2021: an application of a decision support system (DSS) to compare adaptation strategies. Uppsala Universitet.
48. Schindler, S., Poirazidis, K., & Wrbka, T. (2008). Towards a core set of landscape metrics for biodiversity assessments: case study from Dadia National Park, Greece. Ecological Indicators, 8, 502–514.
49. Sertel, E., & Alganci, U. (2016). Comparison of pixel and object-based classification for burned area mapping using SPOT-6 images. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 7(4), 1198–1206.
50. Shahraki, S. Z., Seifolddini, F., & Pourahmad, A. (2012). Urban sprawl and fertile agricultural lands in iranian cities—case study: Tehran and Karaj. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 6, 204–210.
51. Soulard, C. E., & Wilson, T. S. (2015). Recent land-use/land-cover change in the Central California Valley. Journal of Land Use Science, 10(1), 59–80.
52. Talebi, M. R., & Ardakani, A. S. (2011). Investigation of Tehran green space changes and its role in air pollution using Landsat images from 1980 to 2010. 5thSASTech 2011, Khavaran Higher Education Institute, Mashhad, Iran. May 12–14.
53. Tinker, D. B., Romme, W. H., & Despain, D. G. (2003). Historic range of variability in landscape structure in subalpine forests of the greater yellow stone area, USA. Landscape Ecology, 18, 427–439.
54. Usman, M., Liedl, R., Shahid, M., & Abbas, A. (2015). Land use/land cover classification and its change detection using multi-temporal MODIS NDVI data. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(12), 1479–1506.
55. Vadrevu, K. P., Justice, C., Prasad, T., Prasad, N., & Gutman, G. (2015). Land cover/land use change and impacts on environment in South Asia. Journal of environmental management (148), 1–3.
56. Wijitkosum, S. (2016). The impact of land use and spatial changes on desertification risk in degraded areas in Thailand. Sustainable Environment Research., 26(2), 84–92.
57. Wulder, M. A., White, J. C., Goward, S. N., Masek, J. G., Irons, J. R., Herold, M., et al. (2008). Landsat continuity: issues and opportunities for land cover monitoring. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(3), 955–969.
58. Yang, X. (2011). Urban remote sensing: monitoring, synthesis and modeling in the urban environment. John Wiley & Sons.
59. Yang, X., & Lo, C. P. (2002). Modelling urban growth and landscape changes in the Atlanta metropolitan area. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17(5), 463–688.
60. Yu, L., & Gong, P. (2012). Google Earth as a virtual globe tool for earth science applications at the global scale: progress and perspectives. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33(12), 3966–3986.
61. Yu, W., Zang, S., Wu, C., Liu, W., & Na, X. (2011). Analyzing and modeling land use land cover change (LUCC) in the Daqing City, China. Applied Geography, 31, 600–608.
62. Yuan, D., Elvidge, C. D., & Lunetta, R. S. (1998a). Survey of multispectral methods for land cover change analysis.
63. Yuan, D., Elvidge, C. D., & Lunetta, R. S. (1998b). Survey of multispectral methods for land cover change analysis. Remote sensing change detection: environmental monitoring methods and applications, 21–39.Michigan’ Ann Arbor Press.
64. Zhong, C., Li, L., & Bu, F. (2014). Study of modified band selection methods of hyperspectral image based on optimum index factor ", Proc. SPIE 9299, International symposium on optoelectronic technology and application 2014: Optical remote sensing technology and applications, 929911.
65. Zou, X., Zhao, G., Li, J., Yang, Y., & Fang, Y. (2016). Object based image analysis combining high spatial resolution imagery and laser point clouds for urban land cover. ISPRS-International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2016, 733–739.