Fraud Not a Primary Cause of Irreproducible Results: A Reply to Clark et al.

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 900-

  Parker, Timothy H ^a   Forstmeier, Wolfgang ^b   Koricheva, Julia ^c   Fidler, Fiona ^d   Hadfield, Jarrod D ^e   Chee, Yung En ^d   Kelly, Clint D ^f   Gurevitch, Jessica ^g   Nakagawa, Shinichi ^h  

^a WHITMAN COLLEGE   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR ORNITHOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^g STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRAUD; HUMAN;

FRAUD; HUMANS;

EID: 84997428928     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.004     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. 1 Clark, T.D. et al. Scientific misconduct: the elephant in the lab. Trends Ecol. Evol. (in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.006.
2. 2 Fang, F.C., et al. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 (2012), 17028–17033.