Developing a conceptual framework to evaluate effectiveness of emergency response system for oil spill

Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition)

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 120-128

  Wang, Haiyan ^a   Ren, Jun ^b   Wang, Jin ^b   Yang, Jiaqi ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

effectiveness; emergency response system (ERS); FMECA; oil spill

Indexed keywords

EID: 84997294341     PISSN: 20957564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S2095-7564(15)30096-9     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abrahamsson, M., Hassel, H., Tehler, H., Towards a system-oriented framework for analyzing and evaluating emergency response. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 18:1 (2010), 14–26.
2. Alijani, G.S., Mancuso, L.C., Omar, A., et al. A gumbo of catastrophic effects-the effects of the BP oil spill measured during the oil spill and six months after the oil spill on three towns in South Louisiana. Entrepreneurial Executive 17 (2012), 1–12.
3. Brown, D.E., Robinson, C.D., Development a metrics to evaluate effectiveness of emergency response operations., 10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium; the Future C2, University of Virginia, 2005.
4. Charlies, E.E., An introduction to reliability and maintainability engineering. 1997, McGraw Hill, New York.
5. Fimrite, P., Response improved since 2007, 2007 San Francisco Chronicle (10/1/2007 present), 19328672, 1/ 8/2013, regional business news.
6. Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Evaluating effectiveness; a framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas. 2nd Edition, 2006, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
7. ITOPF, Contingency planning for marine oil spills. Technical Information Paper 16, 2011, Impact, PR & Design Limited, Cantebury, UK.
8. Jackson, B.A., Faith, K.S., Willis, H.H., Are we prepared? using reliability analysis to evaluate emergency response systems. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 19:3 (2011), 147–158.
9. Jackson, B.A., Evaluating the reliability of emergency response systems for large-scale accident operations. 2010, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
10. Kirby, M.F., Law, R.J., Accidental spills at sea-risk, impact, mitigation and the need for co-ordinated post-accident monitoring. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60 (2010), 797–803.
11. : qualitative analysis of their effectiveness. American Journal of Critical Care 22:3 (2013), 198–211.
12. Liu, H.C., Liu, L., Bian, Q.H., et al. Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (2011), 4403–4415.
13. MIL-STD-1629A, Military standard procedures for performing a failure mode, effects and critically analysis AMSC N3074, 1980.
14. Mustaffa, A.A., Kazunori, H., The effectiveness of emergency response system's service providers for road accidents in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. Civil Engineering Dimension 14:2 (2012), 77–83.
15. Salmon, P., Stanton, N., Jenkins, D., et al. Coordination during multi-agency emergency response: issues and solutions. Disaster Prevention and Management 20:2 (2011), 140–158.
16. Smith, N., Clark, T., A framework to model and measure system effectiveness., 11th ICCRTS-Coalition Command and Control in the Network Era, 2006.
17. The Associated, Press, China oil spill grows, official warns of severe threat. 2010, The Huffington Post.
18. Tuler, S., Webler, T., Stakeholder perspectives about marine oil spill response objectives; a comparative q study of four regions. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 17:2 (2009), 95–108.
19. Uhr, C., Johansson, H., Fredholm, L., Analyzing emergency response systems. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 16:2 (2008), 80–90.
20. Vivacqua, A.S., Borges, M.R.S., Taking advantage of collective knowledge in emergency response systems. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 35 (2012), 189–198.
21. : a meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology 88:2 (2003), 234–245.