Comparative Hemodynamic Effects of Contemporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in a Porcine Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 9, Issue 22, 2016, Pages 2292-2303

  Weil, Brian R ^a   Konecny, Filip ^b   Suzuki, Gen ^a   Iyer, Vijay ^a   Canty, John M ^a,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^d VA WESTERN NEW YORK HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

acute myocardial infarction; left ventricular assist device; percutaneous mechanical circulatory support; ventricular unloading

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; AORTA PRESSURE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC PRESSURE; HEART MUSCLE REPERFUSION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMICS; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; NONHUMAN; PRELOAD RECRUITABLE STROKE WORK; PRESSURE VOLUME CURVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; YORKSHIRE PIG; ANIMAL; CONVALESCENCE; DISEASE MODEL; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART VENTRICLE PRESSURE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PIG; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TIME FACTOR;

ANIMALS; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HEMODYNAMICS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE VOLUME; SUS SCROFA; TIME FACTORS; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT; VENTRICULAR PRESSURE;

EID: 84997272281     PISSN: 19368798     EISSN: 18767605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.037     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. 1 Mozaffarian, D., Benjamin, E.J., Go, A.S., et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 131 (2015), e29–e322.
2. 2 Jeger, R.V., Radovanovic, D., Hunziker, P.R., et al. Ten-year trends in the incidence and treatment of cardiogenic shock. Ann Intern Med 149 (2008), 618–626.
3. 3 Goldberg, R.J., Spencer, F.A., Gore, J.M., Lessard, D., Yarzebski, J., Thirty-year trends (1975-2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective. Circulation 119 (2009), 1211–1219.
4. 4 Aissaoui, N., Puymirat, E., Tabone, X., et al. Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French nationwide registries. Eur Heart J 33 (2012), 2535–2543.
5. 5 Thiele, H., Zeymer, U., Neumann, F.J., et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 367 (2012), 1287–1296.
6. 6 Cuffe, M.S., Califf, R.M., Adams, K.F. Jr., et al. Short-term intravenous milrinone for acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 287 (2002), 1541–1547.
7. 7 Shoemaker, W.C., Appel, P.L., Kram, H.B., Duarte, D., Harrier, H.D., Ocampo, H.A., Comparison of hemodynamic and oxygen transport effects of dopamine and dobutamine in critically ill surgical patients. Chest 96 (1989), 120–126.
8. 8 Prondzinsky, R., Unverzagt, S., Russ, M., et al. Hemodynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP shock trial. Shock 37 (2012), 378–384.
9. 9 Thiele, H., Schuler, G., Neumann, F.J., et al. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: design and rationale of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial. Am Heart J 163 (2012), 938–945.
10. 10 Sjauw, K.D., Engstrom, A.E., Vis, M.M., et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines?. Eur Heart J 30 (2009), 459–468.
11. 11 Meyns, B., Stolinski, J., Leunens, V., Verbeken, E., Flameng, W., Left ventricular support by catheter-mounted axial flow pump reduces infarct size. J Am Coll Cardiol 41 (2003), 1087–1095.
12. 12 Kapur, N.K., Paruchuri, V., Urbano-Morales, J.A., et al. Mechanically unloading the left ventricle before coronary reperfusion reduces left ventricular wall stress and myocardial infarct size. Circulation 128 (2013), 328–336.
13. 13 Kapur, N.K., Qiao, X., Paruchuri, V., et al. Mechanical pre-conditioning with acute circulatory support before reperfusion limits infarct size in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol HF 3 (2015), 873–882.
14. 14 O'Neill, W.W., Kleiman, N.S., Moses, J., et al. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study. Circulation 126 (2012), 1717–1727.
15. 15 Thiele, H., Sick, P., Boudriot, E., et al. Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 26 (2005), 1276–1283.
16. 16 Burkhoff, D., Naidu, S.S., The science behind percutaneous hemodynamic support: a review and comparison of support strategies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80 (2012), 816–829.
17. 17 Naidu, S.S., Novel percutaneous cardiac assist devices: the science of and indications for hemodynamic support. Circulation 123 (2011), 533–543.
18. 18 Burkhoff, D., Hemodynamic support: science and evaluation of the assisted circulation with percutaneous assist devices. Interv Cardiol Clin 2 (2013), 407–416.
19. 19 McCall, F.C., Telukuntla, K.S., Karantalis, V., et al. Myocardial infarction and intramyocardial injection models in swine. Nat Protoc 7 (2012), 1479–1496.
20. 20 Jones, S.P., Tang, X.L., Guo, Y., et al. The NHLBI-sponsored Consortium for Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (CAESAR): a new paradigm for rigorous, accurate, and reproducible evaluation of putative infarct-sparing interventions in mice, rabbits, and pigs. Circ Res 116 (2015), 572–586.
21. 21 Schipke, J.D., Burkhoff, D., Kass, D.A., Alexander, J. Jr., Schaefer, J., Sagawa, K., Hemodynamic dependence of myocardial oxygen consumption indexes. Am J Physiol 258 (1990), H1281–H1291.
22. 22 Takaoka, H., Takeuchi, M., Odake, M., et al. Comparison of hemodynamic determinants for myocardial oxygen consumption under different contractile states in human ventricle. Circulation 87 (1993), 59–69.
23. 23 Suga, H., Total mechanical energy of a ventricle model and cardiac oxygen consumption. Am J Physiol 236 (1979), H498–H505.
24. 24 Kapur, N.K., Paruchuri, V., Pham, D.T., et al. Hemodynamic effects of left atrial or left ventricular cannulation for acute circulatory support in a bovine model of left heart injury. ASAIO J 61 (2015), 301–306.
25. 25 Canty, J.M. Jr., Duncker, D.J.G.M., Coronary blood flow and myocardial ischemia. Mann, D.L., Zipes, D.P., Libby, P., Bonow, R.O., (eds.) Braunwald's heart disease, 10th ed., 2014, Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, 1029–1056.