-
1
-
-
84913582539
-
Innovative research methods for studying treatments for rare diseases: methodological review
-
Gagne JJ, Thompson L, O'Keefe K, Kesselheim AS. Innovative research methods for studying treatments for rare diseases: methodological review. BMJ. 2014; 349:6802. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6802.
-
(2014)
BMJ
, vol.349
, pp. 6802
-
-
Gagne, J.J.1
Thompson, L.2
O'Keefe, K.3
Kesselheim, A.S.4
-
2
-
-
77957684487
-
Early versus delayed treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer (MRC OV05/EORTC 55955): a randomised trial
-
Rustin GJS, van der Burg MEL, Griffin CL, Guthrie D, Lamont A, Jayson GC, et al.Early versus delayed treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer (MRC OV05/EORTC 55955): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010; 376(9747):1155-63. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61268-8.
-
(2010)
Lancet
, vol.376
, Issue.9747
, pp. 1155-1163
-
-
Rustin, G.J.S.1
van der Burg, M.E.L.2
Griffin, C.L.3
Guthrie, D.4
Lamont, A.5
Jayson, G.C.6
-
3
-
-
84922655364
-
Clinical trial designs for rare diseases: studies developed and discussed by the international rare cancers initiative
-
Bogaerts J, Sydes MR, Keat N, McConnell A, Benson A, Ho A, et al.Clinical trial designs for rare diseases: studies developed and discussed by the international rare cancers initiative. Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51(3):271-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.10.027.
-
(2015)
Eur J Cancer
, vol.51
, Issue.3
, pp. 271-281
-
-
Bogaerts, J.1
Sydes, M.R.2
Keat, N.3
McConnell, A.4
Benson, A.5
Ho, A.6
-
4
-
-
0017042882
-
Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design
-
Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, Breslow NE, Cox DR, Howard SV, et al.Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design. Br J Cancer. 1976; 34(6):585-612.
-
(1976)
Br J Cancer
, vol.34
, Issue.6
, pp. 585-612
-
-
Peto, R.1
Pike, M.C.2
Armitage, P.3
Breslow, N.E.4
Cox, D.R.5
Howard, S.V.6
-
5
-
-
84900409159
-
Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (difference ELicitation in TriAls) review
-
Cook J, Hislop J, Adewuyi T, Harrild K, Altman D, Ramsay C, et al.Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (difference ELicitation in TriAls) review. Health Technol Assess. 2014; 18(28):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta18280.
-
(2014)
Health Technol Assess.
, vol.18
, Issue.28
, pp. 1-166
-
-
Cook, J.1
Hislop, J.2
Adewuyi, T.3
Harrild, K.4
Altman, D.5
Ramsay, C.6
-
6
-
-
84939147784
-
Specifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: guidance for researchers
-
Cook JA, Hislop J, Altman DG, Fayers P, Briggs AH, Ramsay CR, et al.Specifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: guidance for researchers. Trials. 2015; 16(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0526-8.
-
(2015)
Trials
, vol.16
, Issue.1
, pp. 12
-
-
Cook, J.A.1
Hislop, J.2
Altman, D.G.3
Fayers, P.4
Briggs, A.H.5
Ramsay, C.R.6
-
7
-
-
33846563409
-
Why most published research findings are false
-
Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Med. 2005; 2(8):124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
-
(2005)
PLOS Med
, vol.2
, Issue.8
, pp. 124
-
-
Ioannidis, J.P.A.1
-
8
-
-
84882985976
-
Medical research: trial unpredictability yields predictable therapy gains
-
Djulbegovic B, Kumar A, Glasziou P, Miladinovic B, Chalmers I. Medical research: trial unpredictability yields predictable therapy gains. Nature. 2013; 500(7463):395-6. doi: 10.1038/500395a.
-
(2013)
Nature
, vol.500
, Issue.7463
, pp. 395-396
-
-
Djulbegovic, B.1
Kumar, A.2
Glasziou, P.3
Miladinovic, B.4
Chalmers, I.5
-
9
-
-
84977654753
-
New insights into the evaluation of randomized controlled trials for rare diseases over a long-term research horizon: a simulation study
-
Bayar MA, Le Teuff G, Michiels S, Sargent D, Le Deley MC. New insights into the evaluation of randomized controlled trials for rare diseases over a long-term research horizon: a simulation study. Stat Med. 2016; 35(19):3245-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.6942.
-
(2016)
Stat Med.
, vol.35
, Issue.19
, pp. 3245-3258
-
-
Bayar, M.A.1
Le Teuff, G.2
Michiels, S.3
Sargent, D.4
Le Deley, M.C.5
-
10
-
-
0003884301
-
Statistical issues in drug development
-
Chichester: Wiley
-
Senn S. Statistical issues in drug development. Chichester: Wiley; 2007.
-
(2007)
-
-
Senn, S.1
-
11
-
-
0043172579
-
Novel designs for multi-arm clinical trials with survival outcomes with an application in ovarian cancer
-
Royston P, Parmar MKB, Qian W. Novel designs for multi-arm clinical trials with survival outcomes with an application in ovarian cancer. Stat Med. 2003; 22(14):2239-56. doi: 10.1002/sim.1430.
-
(2003)
Stat Med
, vol.22
, Issue.14
, pp. 2239-2256
-
-
Royston, P.1
Parmar, M.K.B.2
Qian, W.3
-
12
-
-
84876090888
-
Assessing potential sources of clustering in individually randomised trials
-
Kahan BC, Morris TP. Assessing potential sources of clustering in individually randomised trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13(1):58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-58.
-
(2013)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.13
, Issue.1
, pp. 58
-
-
Kahan, B.C.1
Morris, T.P.2
-
13
-
-
84935692016
-
Leveraging prognostic baseline variables to gain precision in randomized trials
-
Colantuoni E, Rosenblum M. Leveraging prognostic baseline variables to gain precision in randomized trials. Stat Med. 2015; 34(18):2602-17. doi: 10.1002/sim.6507.
-
(2015)
Stat Med
, vol.34
, Issue.18
, pp. 2602-2617
-
-
Colantuoni, E.1
Rosenblum, M.2
-
14
-
-
84899908854
-
The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies
-
Kahan BC, Jairath V, Doré CJ, Morris TP. The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies. Trials. 2014; 15(1):139. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-139.
-
(2014)
Trials
, vol.15
, Issue.1
, pp. 139
-
-
Kahan, B.C.1
Jairath, V.2
Doré, C.J.3
Morris, T.P.4
-
15
-
-
59349117357
-
Handling covariates in the design of clinical trials
-
Rosenberger WF, Sverdlov O. Handling covariates in the design of clinical trials. Stat Sci. 2008; 23(3):404-19.
-
(2008)
Stat Sci
, vol.23
, Issue.3
, pp. 404-419
-
-
Rosenberger, W.F.1
Sverdlov, O.2
-
16
-
-
84893752911
-
Variance reduction in randomised trials by inverse probability weighting using the propensity score
-
Williamson EJ, Forbes A, White IR. Variance reduction in randomised trials by inverse probability weighting using the propensity score. Stat Med. 2014; 33(5):721-37. doi: 10.1002/sim.5991.
-
(2014)
Stat Med
, vol.33
, Issue.5
, pp. 721-737
-
-
Williamson, E.J.1
Forbes, A.2
White, I.R.3
-
18
-
-
84960131003
-
A re-randomisation design for clinical trials
-
Kahan BC, Forbes AB, Doré CJ, Morris TP. A re-randomisation design for clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015; 15(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0082-2.
-
(2015)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.15
, Issue.1
, pp. 96
-
-
Kahan, B.C.1
Forbes, A.B.2
Doré, C.J.3
Morris, T.P.4
-
20
-
-
84966477902
-
EURAMOS-1, an international randomised study for osteosarcoma: results from pre-randomisation treatment
-
Whelan JS, Bielack SS, Marina N, Smeland S, Jovic G, Hook JM, et al.EURAMOS-1, an international randomised study for osteosarcoma: results from pre-randomisation treatment. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26(2):407-14. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu526.
-
(2015)
Ann Oncol
, vol.26
, Issue.2
, pp. 407-414
-
-
Whelan, J.S.1
Bielack, S.S.2
Marina, N.3
Smeland, S.4
Jovic, G.5
Hook, J.M.6
-
21
-
-
84941276779
-
Methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MAP) plus maintenance pegylated interferon alfa-2b versus MAP alone in patients with resectable high-grade osteosarcoma and good histologic response to preoperative MAP: first results of the Euramos-1 good response randomized controlled trial
-
Bielack SS, Smeland S, Whelan JS, Marina N, Jovic G, Hook JM, et al.Methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MAP) plus maintenance pegylated interferon alfa-2b versus MAP alone in patients with resectable high-grade osteosarcoma and good histologic response to preoperative MAP: first results of the Euramos-1 good response randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(20):2279-87. doi: 10.1200/jco.2014.60.0734.
-
(2015)
J Clin Oncol.
, vol.33
, Issue.20
, pp. 2279-2287
-
-
Bielack, S.S.1
Smeland, S.2
Whelan, J.S.3
Marina, N.4
Jovic, G.5
Hook, J.M.6
-
22
-
-
84908042854
-
Bayesian methods for the design and interpretation of clinical trials in very rare diseases
-
Hampson LV, Whitehead J, Eleftheriou D, Brogan P. Bayesian methods for the design and interpretation of clinical trials in very rare diseases. Stat Med. 2014; 33(24):4186-201. doi: 10.1002/sim.6225.
-
(2014)
Stat Med
, vol.33
, Issue.24
, pp. 4186-4201
-
-
Hampson, L.V.1
Whitehead, J.2
Eleftheriou, D.3
Brogan, P.4
-
23
-
-
84959262585
-
Research methods to change clinical practice for patients with rare cancers
-
Billingham L, Malottki K, Steven N. Research methods to change clinical practice for patients with rare cancers. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(2):70-80. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00396-4.
-
(2016)
Lancet Oncol
, vol.17
, Issue.2
, pp. 70-80
-
-
Billingham, L.1
Malottki, K.2
Steven, N.3
|