What is the impact of the August 24, 2016 Amatrice earthquake on the seismic hazard assessment in central Italy?

Annals of Geophysics

Volumn 59, Issue FastTrack5, 2016, Pages

  Murru, Maura ^a   Taroni, Matteo ^a   Akinci, Aybige ^a   Falcone, Giuseppe ^a  

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI GEOFISICA E VULCANOLOGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUILA;

EID: 84997018062     PISSN: 15935213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4401/ag-7209     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Akinci A, Mueller C, Malagnini L, Lombardi AM (2004) A probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the Alps and Apennines (Italy) using historical seismicity and new predictive ground-motion relationships. Boll Geofis Teor Appl 45(4):285-304
2. Akinci A, Galadini F, Pantosti D, Petersen M, Malagnini L, Perkins D.(2009). Effect of time dependence on probabilistic seismic-hazard maps and deaggregation for the Central Apennines, Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am;99(2A):585-610.
3. Akinci A, Perkins D, Lombardi AM, Basili R. (2010). Uncertainties in probability of occurrence of strong earthquakes for fault sources in the Central Apennines, Italy. J Seismol, doi:10.1007/s10950-008-9142-y.
4. Akinci A., Vannoli P., Falcone G., Taroni M., Tiberti M. M., Murru M., Burrato P., and Mariucci M. T., 2016. When Time and Faults Matter: Towards a Time-Dependent Probabilistic SHA in Calabria, Italy, (Submitted to Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering).
5. Akkar, S. and Bommer, J.J. (2010). Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean, and the Middle East. Seismol Res Lett 81(2):195-206. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.81.2.195.
6. Bindi D, Pacor F, Luzi L, Puglia R, Massa M, Ameri G and, Paolucci R (2011). Ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian strong motion database. B Earthq Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10518-011-9313-z
7. Bird, P., and Y. Y. Kagan (2004). Plate-tectonic analysis of shallow seismicity: Apparent boundary width, beta, corner magnitude, coupled lithosphere thickness, and coupling in seven tectonic settings, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94(6), 2380-2399, plus electronic supplement, 2004.
8. Cornell C. A. (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bull Seism Soc Am, 58: 1583-1606.
9. Delavaud E, Cotton F, Akkar S et al (2012) Towards a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe. J Seismol 16:451-473. doi:10.1007/s10950-012-9281-z
10. Frankel A. (1995). Mapping seismic hazard in the central and eastern United States, Seismol. Res. Lett., 66, 8-21.
11. Gardner, J. K. and Knopoff, L. (1974). Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?, Seismol. Soc. Am., 64, 1363-1367, 1974.
12. Gasperini P., Lolli B. and Vannucci G. (2013). Empirical calibration of local magnitude data sets versus moment magnitude in Italy, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 103, 2227-2246, 2013.
13. Gutenberg, B. and Richter C.F. (1944). Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bull Seism Soc Am, 34, 185-188.
14. Kagan, Y. Y., and D. D. Jackson (2000). Probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes, Geophys. J. Int., 143, 438-453.
15. Kanamori, H. (1977). The Energy release in Great Earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 2981-2987.
16. Marzocchi W. and M. Taroni, (2014). Some Thoughts on Declustering in Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analysis, Bull Seism Soc Am., 104, 1838-1845, doi:10.1785/0120130300.
17. Pace B, Peruzza L, Lavecchia G, Boncio P (2006) Layered seismogenic source model and probabilistic seismic hazard analyses in Central Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:107-132. doi:10.1785/0120040231.
18. Rovida A., Locati M., Camassi R., Lolli B., Gasperini P. (eds) (2016). CPTI15, the 2015 version of the Parametric Catalogue of Italian Earthquakes. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, doi:http://doi.org/10.6092/INGV.IT‐CPTI15
19. Zöller, G., and M. Holschneider (2015). The earthquake history in a fault zone tells us almost nothing about mmax, Seismol Res Lett, doi:10.1785/0220150176.