Medical publishing and the threat of predatory journals

International Journal of Women's Dermatology

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 115-116

  Beall, Jeffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

E-MAIL; EDITORIAL; ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENTIST; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

EID: 84996938077     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23526475     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2016.08.002     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Anticancer Fund, GcMAF [Internet]., 2015 [cited 2016 August 12]. Available from: http://www.anticancerfund.org/therapies/gcmaf.
2. Beall, J, Predatory open-access scholarly publishers. Charlest Advis 11:4 (2010), 10–17.
3. Beall, J, Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98:2 (2016), 77–79.
4. Beninger, PG, Beall, J, Shumway, SE, Debasing the currency of science: The growing menace of predatory open access journals. J Shellfish Res 35:1 (2016), 1–5.
5. Glick M. Publish and perish! J Am Dent Assoc 2016;147(6):385-7.
6. Nicoll, LH, Chinn, PL, Caught in the trap: The allure of deceptive publishers. Nurse Author Ed, 25(4), 2015, 4.
7. Solomon, D, Björk, BC, Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada. Peer J, 4, 2016, e2264.
8. Tzarnas, S, Tzarnas, CD, Publish or perish, and pay—The new paradigm of open-access journals. J Surg Educ 72:2 (2015), 283–285.