The impact of didactic read-aloud action cards on the performance of cannula cricothyroidotomy in a simulated ‘can't intubate can't oxygenate’ scenario

Anaesthesia

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 343-349

  Harvey, R ^a   Foulds, L ^b   Housden, T ^c   Bennett, K A ^d   Falzon, D ^e   McNarry, A F ^f   Graham, C ^g  

^a BORDERS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NINEWELLS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c ST JOHN'S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d WISHAW GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^f WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

difficult airway algorithm; failed intubation: treatment; front of neck access; human factors: cognitive aids

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL AID; CANNULA; CANNULA CRICOTHYROIDOTOMY; CHECKLIST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIDACTIC ACTION CARD; HIGH FIDELITY SIMULATION TRAINING; HUMAN; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL STUDENT; OXYGENATION; PRELIMINARY COMMUNICATION; RESPIRATION CONTROL; SIMULATOR; SURGICAL TRAINING; TRACHEOTOMY; VIDEORECORDING; AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CRICOID CARTILAGE; EMERGENCY; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCOTLAND; STANDARDS; THYROID CARTILAGE;

AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION; CANNULA; CHECKLIST; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CRICOID CARTILAGE; EMERGENCIES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; SCOTLAND; THYROID CARTILAGE; TRACHEOTOMY;

EID: 84996910413     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.13643     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Marshall S. The use of cognitive aids during emergencies in anesthesia: a review of the literature. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2013; 117: 1162–71.
2. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New England Journal of Medicine 2009; 360: 491–9.
3. Ziewacz JE, Arriaga AF, Bader AM, et al. Crisis checklists for the operating room: development and pilot testing. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2011; 213: 212–7, e10.
4. Marshall SD, Mehra R. The effects of a displayed cognitive aid on non-technical skills in a simulated ‘can't intubate, can't oxygenate’ crisis. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 669–77.
5. Burden AR, Carr ZJ, Staman GW, Littman JJ, Torjman MC. Does every code need a “reader?” improvement of rare event management with a cognitive aid “reader” during a simulated emergency: a pilot study. Simulation in Healthcare 2012; 7: 1–9.
6. Neily J, DeRosier JM, Mills PD, Bishop MJ, Weeks WB, Bagian JP. Awareness and use of a cognitive aid for anesthesiology. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2007; 33: 502–11.
7. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C, eds. Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society: Major Complications of Airway Management in the UK Report and Findings. London: Royal College of Anaesthetists, 2011.
8. Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, et al. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2015; 115: 827–48.
9. Stiegler MP, Neelankavil JP, Canales C, Dhillon A. Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2012; 108: 229–35.
10. O'Sullivan E, Laffey J, Pandit JJ. A rude awakening after our fourth ‘NAP’: lessons for airway management. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 331–4.
11. Kuhlmann S, Piel M, Wolf OT. Impaired memory retrieval after psychosocial stress in healthy young men. Journal of Neuroscience 2005; 25: 2977–82.
12. Wong DT, Prabhu AJ, Coloma M, Imasogie N, Chung FF. What is the minimum training required for successful cricothyroidotomy? A study in mannequins. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 349–53.
13. Marshall SD, Sanderson P, McIntosh CA, Kolawode H. The effect of two cognitive aid designs on team functioning during intra-operative anaphylaxis emergencies: a multi-centre simulation study. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 389–404.
14. Merry AF, Mitchell SJ. Advancing patient safety through the use of cognitive aids. BMJ Quality and Safety 2016; 25: 733–5.
15. Nanji KC, Cooper JB. It is time to use checklists for anesthesia emergencies: simulation is the vehicle for testing and learning. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2012; 37: 1–2.
16. Jenkins B. Cognitive aids: time for a change? Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 660–4.
17. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991.
18. McFetrich J. A structured literature review on the use of high fidelity patient simulators for teaching in emergency medicine. Emergency Medicine Journal 2006; 23: 509–11.
19. Ko HC, Turner TJ, Finnigan MA. Systematic review of safety checklists for use by medical care teams in acute hospital settings-limited evidence of effectiveness. BMC Health Services Research 2011; 11: 211.
20. Boet S, Borges BC, Naik VN, et al. Complex procedural skills are retained for a minimum of 1 yr after a single high-fidelity simulation training session. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2011; 107: 533–9.