Effectiveness of interventions for adult peripheral intravenous catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

International Emergency Nursing

Volumn 31, Issue , 2017, Pages 15-21

  Parker, Shannon I A ^a   Benzies, Karen M ^a   Hayden, K Alix ^a   Lang, Eddy S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adult; Cannulation; Nursing; Peripheral intravenous catheterization; Success; Systematic review; Ultrasound; Vascular access; Venous

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CATHETERIZATION; DEVICES; HOSPITAL EMERGENCY SERVICE; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

ADULT; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; HUMANS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;

EID: 84996671160     PISSN: 1755599X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2016.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aponte, H., Acosta, S., Rigamonti, D., Sylvia, B., Austin, P., Samolitis, T., The use of ultrasound for placement of intravenous catheters. Am. Assoc. Nurse Anesthet. J. 75:3 (2007), 212–216.
2. Asai, T., Matsumoto, S., Matsumoto, K., Yamamoto, K., Shingu, K., Prevention of needle-stick injury: efficacy of a safeguarded intravenous cannula. Anaesthesia 54 (1999), 258–261.
3. Asai, T., Hidaka, I., Kawashima, A., Miki, T., Inada, K., Kawachi, S., Efficacy of catheter needles with safeguard mechanisms. Anaesthesia 57:6 (2002), 572–577.
4. Aulagnier, J., Hoc, C., Mathieu, E., Dreyfus, J.F., Fischler, M., Le Guen, M., Efficacy of AccuVein to facilitate peripheral intravenous placement in adults presenting to an emergency department: a randomized clinical trial. Acad. Emerg. Med. 21:8 (2014), 858–863.
5. Burgher, S.W., Mcguirk, T.D., Subcutaneous buffered lidocaine for intravenous cannulation: is there a role in emergency medicine?. Acad. Emerg. Med. 5:11 (1998), 1057–1063.
6. Crowley, M., Brim, C., Proehl, J., Barnason, S., Leviner, S., Lindauer, C., Naccarato, M., Storer, A., Williams, J., Papa, A., Emergency nursing resource: difficult intravenous access. J. Emerg. Nurs. 38:4 (2012), 335–343.
7. Dychter, S.S., Gold, D.A., Carson, D., Haller, M., Intravenous therapy: a review of complications and economic consideration of peripheral access. J. Infus. Nurs. 35:2 (2012), 84–91.
8. Egan, G., Healy, D., O'Neill, H., Clarke-Moloney, M., Grace, P.A., Walsh, S.R., Ultrasound guidance for difficult venous access: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Emerg. Med. 30:7 (2013), 521–526.
9. Harrison, N., Langham, B.T., Bogod, D.G., Appropriate use of local anaesthetic for venous cannulation. Anaesthesia 47 (1992), 210–212.
10. Heinrichs, J., Fritze, Z., Vandermeer, B., Klassen, T., Curtis, S., Ultrasonographically guided peripheral intravenous cannulation of children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Emerg. Med., 61(4), 2013 444–454.e1.
11. Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S., Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. 2011 www.cochrane-handbook.org Accessed 10/11/2014.
12. Idemoto, B.K., Rowbottom, J.R., Reynolds, J.D., Hickman, R.L. Jr., The accucath intravenous catheter system with retractable coiled tip guidewire and conventional peripheral intravenous catheters: a prospective, randomized, controlled comparison. J. Assoc. Vasc. Access 19:2 (2014), 94–102.
13. Jacobson, A.F., Winslow, E.H., Variables influencing intravenous catheter insertion difficulty and failure: an analysis of 339 intravenous catheter insertions. Heart Lung 34:5 (2005), 345–359.
14. Lamperti, M., Bodenham, A.R., Pittiruti, M., Blaivas, M., Augoustides, J.G., Elbarbary, M., Pirotte, T., Karakitsos, D., Ledonne, J., Doniger, S., Scoppettuolo, G., Feller-Kopman, D., Schummer, W., Biffi, R., Desruennes, E., Melniker, L.A., Verghese, S.T., International evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound-guided vascular access. Intensive Care Med. 28:7 (2012), 1105–1117.
15. Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P.J., Kleijnen, J., Moher, D., The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Br. Med. J., 6(7), 2009, 339 b2700.
16. Liu, Y.T., Alsaawi, A., Bjornsson, H.M., Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials. Eur. J. Emerg. Med. 21:1 (2014), 18–23.
17. Mahler, S.A., Wang, H., Lester, C., Skinner, J., Arnold, T.C., Conrad, S.A., Short- vs. long-axis approach to ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access: a prospective randomized study. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 29:9 (2011), 1194–1197.
18. McGowan, J., Sampson, M., Lefebvre, C., An evidence based checklist for the peer review of electronic search strategies (PRESS EBC). Evid. Based Libr. Inform. Pract. 5:1 (2010), 149–154.
19. Moppett, I.K., Szypula, K., Yeoman, P.M., Comparison of EMLA and lidocaine iontophoresis for cannulation analgesia. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 21:3 (2004), 210–213.
20. Ober, S., Craven, G., Making the case for infusion therapy standards and intravenous teams in the era of national health care reform. J. Infus. Nurs. 34:2 (2011), 86–87.
21. Page, D.E., Taylor, D.M., Vapocoolant spray vs. subcutaneous lidocaine injection for reducing the pain of intravenous cannulation: a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Br. J. Anaesth. 105:4 (2010), 519–525.
22. Petticrew, M., Roberts, H., Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. 2006, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom.
23. Prunet, B., Meaudre, E., Montcriol, A., Asencio, Y., Bordes, J., Lacroix, G., Kaiser, E., A prospective randomized trial of two safety peripheral intravenous catheters. Anesth. Analg. 107:1 (2008), 155–158.
24. Rader, T., Mann, M., Stansfield, C., Cooper, C., Sampson, M., Methods for documenting systematic review searches: a discussion of common issues. Res. Synth. Method 5 (2014), 98–115.
25. Riker, M.W., Kennedy, C., Winfrey, B.S., Yen, K., Dowd, M.D., Validation and refinement of the difficult intravenous access score: a clinical prediction rule for identifying children with difficult intravenous access. Acad. Emerg. Med. 18:11 (2011), 1129–1134.
26. Russell, W.J., Micik, S., Gourd, S., Mackay, H., Wright, S., A prospective clinical comparison of two intravenous polyurethane cannulae. Anaesth. Intensive Care 24:6 (1996), 705–709.
27. Sabri, A., Szalas, J., Holmes, K.S., Labib, L., Mussivand, T., Failed attempts and improvement strategies in peripheral intravenous catheterization. Bio-Med. Mater. Eng. 23:1–2 (2013), 93–108.
28. Sebbane, M., Claret, P.G., Lefebvre, S., Mercier, G., Rubenovitch, J., Jreige, R., Eledjam, J.J., De La Coussaye, J.E., Predicting peripheral venous access difficulty in the emergency department using body mass index and a clinical evaluation of venous accessibility. J. Emerg. Med. 44 (2013), 299–305.
29. Selby, I.R., Bowles, B.J., Analgesia for venous cannulation: a comparison of EMLA (5 min application), lignocaine, ethyl chloride, and nothing. J. R. Soc. Med. 88:5 (1995), 264–267.
30. Singer, A.J., Shallat, J., Valentine, S.M., Doyle, L., Sayage, V., Thode, H.C., Cutaneous tape stripping to accelerate the anesthetic effects of EMLA cream: a randomized, controlled trial. Acad. Emerg. Med. 5:11 (1998), 1051–1056.